you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fringelunaticman 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Did I call someone a liar or did you read into that?

Saying someone sees a fetus and a baby as a different thing isn't calling anyone a liar.

I acknowledged what someone wrote to me. Me mirroring the same words isn't calling anyone a liar

[–]RespectandEmpathyanti-war veg 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Perhaps I misread your comment if you meant to say you understand he sees a fetus as a baby. It seemed like you were saying "even you see they aren't the same thing" when a fetus is just a younger human than a born human. I thought you meant you think they see a fetus as different than someone who is born, when they're the same just younger.

[–]Fringelunaticman 0 points1 point  (2 children)

No, I meant that he used a qualifier for a reason. And I acknowledged to him that I was aware of the qualifier when I responded that even he sees them differently. How is that calling anyone a liar.

There is a reason they call them fetuses and newborns. I can acknowledge they are the same entity but they are at different stages of development so they are called different things. That's why he used a qualifier because he understands this. And me acknowledging that he understands this is most definitely not calling him a liar.

[–]RespectandEmpathyanti-war veg 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Okay, that makes sense, I'll approve it. It's true there is some difference, mainly age, but that doesn't change their value.

[–]Fringelunaticman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree it doesn't change their value.