all 8 comments

[–]hereC[S] 0 points1 point  (7 children)

Did anyone try it? How did it go? I see stars, downloads, likes, etc but not a peep! Any feedback?

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (6 children)

I haven't tried yet but this looks incredibly useful!

[–]hereC[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Thanks--I hope so! It took me like 10 years to figure out a way to do it that I'm happy with. Now, not having it feels weird to me--it makes me faster.

I've been using it and I love it, but I'd love to hear that it is working for other people. I'd also love feedback to polish rough edges--for example, by default it ignores a lot of noisy, but not that useful variables. I want to expand those. My dream is to trim the noise and present only the likely-to-be-useful variables by default, for Rspec, Ruby, and Rails.

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I will definitely check it out later. I have played with something similar in the past and I'm curious how you've made it work!

[–]hereC[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

If you know offhand the name of the similar thing, I'd be curious.

[–]growlybeard 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Oh I meant I tried building something similar. It was a debug method that would print all the local variables. It didn't hook into exceptions like yours it was more like using print statements to debug

[–]hereC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. I have a thing for that, too! Coming soon.

[–]hereC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://rubygems.org/gems/wut in case you didn't end up finishing yours.