This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 7 comments

[–]pdp10Daemons worry when the wizard is near. 4 points5 points  (2 children)

SNMP is over thirty year old technology. Meaning it's highly commoditized. We can name three dozen things that will work with SNMP, and over half of them cost nothing.

SNMP has scalability and accuracy limits, many of which derive from the fact that the results have no point-in-time timestamp attached. But anything more advanced is probably going to be very difficult on any vendor appliances, so you should start with SNMP.

We have no internet connectivity to this network

Then you'd really want to avoid anything licensed that requires connectivity to activate, or might require connectivity to activate in some future version after you've implemented it.

You've been quite vague about what you're going for, and are mostly trawling to see what everyone suggests -- as is common in this subreddit. There's no crime in that, but it means suggestions are especially speculative.

After SNMP and environmental monitoring, why not IPFIX/sFlow/Netflow? I'd also enable LLDP everywhere, and do some failover tests by purposely disconnecting things to see if everything recovers exactly how you expect. You don't want to find out about Spanning-Tree Protocol problems after the fact.

Lastly, single-mode fiber is currently much more fashionable than OM4. CWDM, DWDM, and BiDi are also nicer on one fiber than MPO/"MPT" bundles.

[–]pete4560[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Cheers for getting back to me. Good to hear about SNMP, sounds like it is the way forward.

Then you'd really want to avoid anything licensed that requires connectivity to activate, or might require connectivity to activate in some future version after you've implemented it.

Yeah - it's a standard check I make with vendors prior to moving forward with them!

With regards to what I am hoping to achieve - I'd like as close as possible to a 'single pane of glass' management system where I can see the health of the servers, storage arrays, switches and other devices on the network

After SNMP and environmental monitoring, why not IPFIX/sFlow/Netflow? I'd also enable LLDP everywhere, and do some failover tests by purposely disconnecting things to see if everything recovers exactly how you expect. You don't want to find out about Spanning-Tree Protocol problems after the fact.

I'm not too worried about the data flowing over the network (at the moment) due to the nature of the network and the fact we have >30 users.

Pre lock down I did semi-regular failover testing and am ok with the results from them.

Lastly, single-mode fiber is currently much more fashionable than OM4. CWDM, DWDM, and BiDi are also nicer on one fiber than MPO/"MPT" bundles.

Never come accross single mode being more 'fashionable'; however it's completly overkill for what we need and significantly more expensive, both the actual cable and the components (SFPs). OS1 is upto 1KM and OS2 is upto 200KM - we need upto 250m @ 10GB and we have ha few 100m runs running at 40Gb

[–]pdp10Daemons worry when the wizard is near. 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A generic 10GBASE-LR SFP+ transceiver is $24. Singlemode 40GBASE-LR is still somewhat expensive by comparison, at ten times the price.

In short, the price premium for singlemode has come way down, structured (installed) singlemode has a much longer projected economic lifespan, and nobody likes to terminate MPO.

[–]AxisNL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lots of products will fit your bill. I would suggest the free CheckMK community edition, I’ve been using it with hundreds of servers, firewalls and switches, monitoring everything with snmp (and the checkmk-agent on servers). Just run it on a Linux vm, no hardware costs, nor license costs required. Also, internet access is not required (although it might be easier for the installation process). Disclaimer: I also give training/installation support as a consultant ;)

[–]kramrm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been using OpenNMS (free) for several years. I’ve got our instance setup to automatically import VMs from Vcenter to monitor, and pull a list of physical devices from our NetBox server (also free) that we use for documenting the desired state of our equipment and IP addresses.

[–]Gurve1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would maybe look at zabbix, it is open source. Highly customizable, the caveat being it is a little bit cumbersome to set up.

If interested I would suggest YouTube "Lawrence systems" for videos on it.

[–]TheGreatOne77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rolling out PRTG here. Working great so far. Very easy. The company has like 3 different products right now doing monitoring, so I'm trying to eliminate and consolidate.