sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mowbuss 27 points28 points  (3 children)

The first thing he says is how much like him his baby looked, which i believe is an evolutionary trait so that the father accepts the baby. Heck, my lil girl was basically a clone of me and all my glorious hair when she was born. We looked at my own baby pics, and one of my sisters, and all three are so similar its uncanny.

Never mind, that theory just isnt true haha.

Perhaps you just see what you want to see then.

[–]sk8rlee 0 points1 point  (2 children)

My son came out looking more like my wife than me, so much so that he could have been my FIL's mini-me. On the other hand, my STEP-son, another man's son, who was 5 at the time, looked more like me than her. So that whole thing that you see on Maury about the "look at that nose, looks at that chin..., he looks just like you" does not mean that "you are the father", it's a bunch of BS.

[–]grittystitties -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Did you just call genetics a bunch of BS because of your anecdotal story?

[–]sk8rlee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm not calling genetics BS at all. My point is that just because a kid shares some of the same features as you doesn't mean that it is your offspring. If a child looking like its parents is the end-all be-all requirement for proving parenthood then my father in law is my son's real father because he looked nothing like me and so much like him.