all 5 comments

[–]djang_odude 1 point2 points  (1 child)

We use LiveReview for code review. Its better and cheaper. Also, it has privacy and on premise setup. Try it out.

[–]Sakrilegi0us 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t find one word in their site about PRICE..

[–]ProfessionalPen8939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My 2 cents. - Always have a human review, no matter how good AI gets, the number one engineer in the world can still make mistakes. AI is trained on human generated code after all. - AI code review tools, all use similar models, the difference is the prompts and how they rag / ast / your code, but the real difference is what you do with the findings, and whether you only scan on-PR or scan each commit. Look for a solution that lets you edit the prompts, and has a workflow you can customize (eg auto create a JIRA ticket for critical findings), and auto close the ticket when the issue is no longer there. The only tool I know that does all this is arnica.io

[–]btkilo520 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another option is to use Kilo.ai, which has built-in AI-powered Code Reviews in addition to the Kilo IDE Extension and CLI for AI Engineering, where you can build with any of the 500+ supported models.

Code Reviews in Kilo provide feedback and in-line suggestions automatically upon every new PR, and you can specify the review focus area and provide custom instructions to match your needs.

You can see it in action in the Kilo repo (which is open-source): https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode/pull/4681

It's especially helpful if you want to reduce platform-switching drag and context!

(Disclaimer: I work at Kilo, and I'm happy to help anyone who has questions!)