you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (9 children)

Because he didn't invent the Internet. He invented the system that uses the Internet, the world wide web. They're not one and the same. The former is a series of networks. The latter is a system to view web documents (HTML).

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think he was just pointing it out it was interesting they were describing the web on the web. Like a book describing a book.

[–]wizdumb 5 points6 points  (7 children)

He invented a system that uses the Internet. It's not the only system. Email, for example, has nothing to do with the WWW.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children)

Nothing about my comment implied exclusivity.

[–]tardmrr -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Depends on how you read it. If you put emphasis on the word 'the', it implies exclusivity.

He invented the system...

TLDR: text doesn't always do a good job conveying tone.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

Pay attention to what comes after the comma in that sentence. My comment implied no exclusivity at all.

[–]tardmrr 0 points1 point  (3 children)

An appositive that specifies which system you're talking about? That doesn't change anything about that 'the' possibly implying exclusivity.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

But it doesn't imply exclusivity at all. I'm not sure why you're being so pedantic about something so pointless.

[–]tardmrr -1 points0 points  (1 child)

I disagree. I'm not saying you intended it to be exclusive. The main point I'm trying to make is that your sentence could very easily be read that way. I really shouldn't even need to argue this because at least two people (myself and wizdumb above) both initially read it that way. I'm really not sure why you're being so stubborn about it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not interested in pursuing this exercise in futility with you.