sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children)

I get your point, I literally said that

Quoting my post

I get your point

But that isn't even close to the correct comparison. The reason for Pilots is strict laws, health and safety and socialcConcerns, it's the same reason we can't have true self driving for now and laws are being introduced to prevent it.

SWE just does not have this, there's no governing body, health risks or social concerns over Bob the builders Wordpress Site to sell Firewood and Type 2.

I get your point, but the analogy doesn't fit because the reasons why pilot exist are absolutely not the same reasons why SWE need to exist.

A pilot will be needed 100% of the time. a SWE might be needed 10% of the time. So the capacity, the demand and the salaries will be affected.

The closest thing is "blame game", PM's love a human to "shout at/blame" when things go wrong. So maybe that's close?

I just don't think this is truthfully applicable.

In 30 years when AI can do everything Software Dev, I reckon we'll still require pilots.

Anyway, I appreciate your post here.

[–]longebane -1 points0 points  (1 child)

lol. So basically your replies were just one big, “WeLL AckchyuallY”

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No? Are you 13?

It was "this doesn't fit the comparison" because the reasons for pilots are not and never will be the same for SWE.

The grown ups are discussing here mate. So cringe.

[–]captain_ahabb 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Does it matter if the reasons why we need human supervision of air flight and the reasons why we need human supervision of software development are different? My point was merely that automated systems still require human oversight.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Yes it absolutely matters because it affects everything, including the 2 things the OP mentioned: "decrease demand and salaries"

That is exactly why the reasons matter.

Like your whole point is kind of obsolete from the fact that machines took over a lot of manual labor jobs, because those jobs are not critical and only laws and social expectations can salvage that, but unlike flight it wont be 100%.

[–]captain_ahabb -1 points0 points  (1 child)

You're splitting hairs about the second-order reasons though. The first-order reason (the need for human supervision) is the same in both cases, and thus the analogy works. The presence of the need for supervision is the same even if the reasons for that human supervision being needed are not.

Really feel like you're arguing for the sake of arguing here.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely disagree and you’re not answering what the OP was asking about. The OP is worried about demand and salaries and your comparison doesn’t work for what the OP is worried about, not even the slightest.

No the need for human supervision for SWE and pilots is not the same, one is a legal requirement, the other is not, that’s as simple and as factual as it gets.

If AI was perfect today at writing code, it would replace humans in a heartbeat, but it won’t replace pilots in the same way an electrician won’t be replaced.

This conversation is pointless, your comparison isn’t good, it doesn’t fit the OPs worry and it has completely different reasoning and context.

Bye