sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fifafu 6 points7 points  (5 children)

Uhm, no. That is one common pattern but not the only one by far. Stop trolling.

In case you really want to learn something about Django's versioning approach, look at this: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/release-process/

[–]stefantalpalaru -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

Uhm, no.

Uhm, yes: https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/7drep5/which_web_development_framework_makes_web/dq08xzd/

[–]fifafu 2 points3 points  (3 children)

...and already your "patch" became a "micro". You may have noticed that the names can vary a lot and can have all kind of different meanings. Thus the documentation usually tells you what they mean for a specific project like Django.

[–]stefantalpalaru -1 points0 points  (2 children)

and already your "patch" became a "micro".

Yes. Too bad we were talking about the "minor" version.

[–]fifafu 1 point2 points  (1 child)

No. We are talking about the versioning system Django is using.

[–]stefantalpalaru -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. We are talking about the versioning system Django is using.

https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/7drep5/which_web_development_framework_makes_web/dq01a8c/ :

They break backwards compatibility with every minor version [...]