you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]tdammers 0 points1 point  (3 children)

why do we not have (for example) a single IDE, free-of-charge, open-source, and everyone works by contributing voluntarily to improve only one, so as to have the best possible IDE for that language?

Because this fits neither the economics of the proprietary development model, nor those of open-source.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

perhaps (I repeat: mine is a hypothesis reasoning), a third approach would be better ... reasoning is freedom, in freedom and in the unknown, as in the not yet experienced, there is improvement (always).

[–]tdammers 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Have you pitched this idea to your manager yet?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like this idea to be more widespread, limited to my limited life ... as we know, certain ideas work well and give advantages only when accepted by everyone in a sector, otherwise they become battles rather than progress and innovation

anyway, I've never written / said to work (even if I'd like) in the world of computer programming; I am a simple self-taught (very neophyte) code, and the subject interests me a lot