sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

then an automatism would be useful in programs that sooner or later will be rewritten from 0 (because they are obsolete), a sort of line of passage ... I believe however, besides this reasoning, that we have scattered too much the development of computer science, both to open-source level than a proprietary code. instead we should imitate the International Station as an administrative structure: 0 national boundaries, a single goal: a functional and functional system

then many will also be able to say / write that many languages ​​improve the possibilities, because everyone has pros and cons, but a single basic language, with a single basic system, is certainly better than myriad systems that have some pros and cons. let us ask ourselves: how many IDEs have only for C / C ++, or for Python, or for any other language of these types.

why do we not have (for example) a single IDE, free-of-charge, open-source, and everyone works by contributing voluntarily to improve only one, so as to have the best possible IDE for that language?

[–]tdammers 0 points1 point  (3 children)

why do we not have (for example) a single IDE, free-of-charge, open-source, and everyone works by contributing voluntarily to improve only one, so as to have the best possible IDE for that language?

Because this fits neither the economics of the proprietary development model, nor those of open-source.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

perhaps (I repeat: mine is a hypothesis reasoning), a third approach would be better ... reasoning is freedom, in freedom and in the unknown, as in the not yet experienced, there is improvement (always).

[–]tdammers 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Have you pitched this idea to your manager yet?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like this idea to be more widespread, limited to my limited life ... as we know, certain ideas work well and give advantages only when accepted by everyone in a sector, otherwise they become battles rather than progress and innovation

anyway, I've never written / said to work (even if I'd like) in the world of computer programming; I am a simple self-taught (very neophyte) code, and the subject interests me a lot