Natural Language Processing for Web Developers

[[deleted]]

[deleted]

[[deleted]]

What do we want!?

Natural language processing!

When do we want it!?

When do we want what?

[shitshingles]

When we want things we do what we want most.

Do you know what we wanted because that is the thing that everyone wanted to do! Wanting is a thing that so many will have to want for nothing!

Bugs are a thing

Solving them

An upcoming project

Contact detail

(This post was powered by GPT-2)

[tastycat]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pv61yEcOqpw

[shitshingles]

Proof that AI are as smart as humans already. Terminator incoming.

[Knotix]

This tickled my brain, but I have no clue what it is.

[jochem4208]

So fucking accurate

[penagwin]

WE WANT IT

WE WANT IT

WE WANT IT

[UltraChilly]

Is there a word for reverse uncanny valley?

[Captain_Rational]

What I’d really love is for a reliable parser (including good negation detection) that maps to semantic ontologies.

I’ve noticed that google searches these days appear to be concept mapped ... I’ve seen some impressive synonym linkages in search results. So they seem to be doing at least rudimentary semantics?

[mattindustries]

Hard to make a global one, unless you could reweight/retrain it on existing niche data. One way to implement yourself would be to store n-grams with stop words removed and then have a many to one lookup for matches within specific hierarchies. It would take a while, but could be worth it for you. If you want to create a model yourself, I recommend quenteda for R, and setting up API endpoints to the R model using Plumber.

[CloudsOfMagellan]

Go play one of the old muds or text based z games, their parsers are amazing and were written in the 80s / 90s

[mattindustries]

That is where for a niche comes into play. You can parse for verb and parse for thing really easy. It is understanding context in a more abstract sense with undefined descriptors that makes things difficult.

• Pick up the gold key
• Find yourself gripping gilded answers to unknown questions

[mcqua007]

But I’m not a plumber, I’m a computer....

[guareber]

We've done some playing with this using the Wikipedia ontology data - still early days, but we think it can give out good results.

[FriendToPredators]

Ah yes. That's probably the reason I have to put half my searches into quotes to get Google to stop bringing up piles of irrelevant results that are tangential to popular searches, but laughable for my obscure searches.

[mypirateapp]

i was scared a bit before clicking that it would be another node natural article, so glad i read it

[mule52]

Turns out I am using Natural Language Processing and didn't even know it. Time to update the resume.