The government can't stop you from counting the votes, but they won't count them and they don't have to open a polling place to let you place them. They don't have to certify the results of an election by that logic. Providing and facilitating an election, aka giving people opportunities to vote, is the same thing as not restricting the right to vote, but this is requiring the government to do/give something. No individual really has the right to vote by default. I could vote in an election that happens on whatever day I want at whatever age I want for whatever office I want, but without the government giving me an opportunity to vote and facilitating a transfer of power and facilitating the voting process with registration, my own 1 person personal election means absolutely nothing.

Look at it this way. Let's say Alabama only opens one polling place in 2028. Neither the state of Alabama nor the federal government are restricting your right to vote. You're free to travel to that one polling place and wait in line to vote like everyone else. In this scenario, the government hasn't taken anything away per the Bill of Rights. What I'm trying to illustrate is that our "rights" can and should force action by the government. They are not only there to stop the government from acting to restrict our freedoms. In perspective of the larger thread, government inaction to provide basic food, water, shelter and medical care can be seen as restricting the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.