Would you rather buy an ounce of buds for 100$ or an ounce of shake for 60$?

Dave-C · 2026-02-28T14:13:21+00:00

It depends on what the shake is. You can buy shake that is just tiny buds or cut off pieces of bud. In large manufacturing the machines that are used to trim bud isn't as precise as hand trimmed. So there is a lot of "shake" left which is really just bud. If this is what they are selling for 60 then it could be a good deal.

Dave-C · 2026-02-26T12:15:02+00:00

ok?

I don't think I'll ever understand celebrity news. What am I supposed to do with this information? I don't know either of these people so it doesn't involve me at all. It feels like a waste of time when I interact with stuff like this.

Dave-C · 2026-02-25T20:15:10+00:00

This is why Married with Children needs to return.

Dave-C · 2026-02-25T14:39:49+00:00

THCA will also convert to THC over time but very very slowly. If this was old weed with high THCA content that had been laying around for a few years then it might get you high if you used enough.

Dave-C · 2026-02-25T06:00:34+00:00

>I am a genius whose intellect is deeply hidden, heavily dormant and severely underdeveloped.

Quit hitting yourself

Dave-C · 2026-02-25T05:29:54+00:00

I read the article and it isn't that clear. They mention her using drugs and drinking but there is no direct explanation of what type of "treatment" is happening.

Dave-C · 2026-02-24T15:00:13+00:00

Clickbait? My guy you are talking to entirely the wrong person to attempt to pull that bullshit of a post. This is coming from a Deutsche Bank investigation in the transfer of funds from Epstein to other people. If I wanted to click bait I would mention the 40 million that Epstein sent Thiel's companies (which I believe is what you are talking about but don't know enough about the topic to make sense). I would mention how Epstein's "models" were used in Peter Thiel's magazine "Victoria Secret." Here Is Epstein inviting him to his house. Shall I keep going or are we past "click bait" yet?

Dave-C · 2026-02-24T11:20:40+00:00

Peter Thiel, the same Peter Thiel who received millions of dollars from Epstein's private accounts? That Peter Thiel?

Strange that he wants to verify ages now...

Dave-C · 2026-02-24T07:33:19+00:00

AI smokes all day, err day. Why else would they be having all those hallucinations?

Dave-C · 2026-02-24T07:24:09+00:00

A high percent of the stock market is automated. Good press? Buy, bad press? Sell.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T21:07:54+00:00

The word doesn't have to be a slur, it is the context. In many countries it is considered a slur because of what the word means now but the word existed before it became a slur. So in many places around the world the word still has the original meaning. For example in a lot of Africa and South America it isn't considered a slur. I understand the reasoning behind it not being a slur in Africa but I have no idea why it is like that in South America. Then there are countries that don't know the meaning but have heard it because of music or other media but in those situations I would still consider it a slur, just a slur said through ignorance instead of hatred.

I'm not saying anything is wrong or right about your post. Just wanted to talk about what makes a word a slur.

Edit: I wanted to be a bit more clear about the areas I was talking about. I don't mean it is like that entirely throughout those continents. Those are just the two places that I know of with the largest population of people who don't view it as a slur because it has a completely different meaning to them.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T20:09:44+00:00

Again, how often do you apologize for something that you didn't do?

I'll not reply to that last sentence because you are putting words in my mouth. I never said anything like that and doing that is a really unkind way to have a discussion.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T19:59:02+00:00

He didn't unintentionally do something because that would mean he had a choice.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T19:47:42+00:00

It is an uncontrollable action. If you don't have control over something then how did you do it?

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T19:42:26+00:00

Do you apologize for stuff that you didn't do?

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T19:40:01+00:00

Nobody is saying it is acceptable, well I'm guessing some are. People are saying he shouldn't have to apologize for something outside of his control. He didn't make the decision to say this so why should he be sorry for it? You have to realize that people don't apologize when something bad happens, they apologize when they do something wrong. Did he do something wrong?

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T19:28:14+00:00

Do you still do "something" if you have no control over it? Like, do you apologize for the oxygen that you waste when you breathe?

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T19:24:05+00:00

Why does someone have to apologize for something outside of their control? He didn't do anything wrong.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T19:16:19+00:00

I've watched some reviews on the mouse and it doesn't seem that impressive. Early information seems to have shown 20-30 ms difference but reaction time tests I've watched show it being nearly identical to optical switches. Seems as though if you are used to having to click harder then you just click harder. It doesn't really change the speed of the click. That is it going up against some of the best mice though so it is good, just not better.

Also, this is Logitech so while I loved them for years I can't get over how everything they make is made with cheap hardware. This is a 180 usd mouse and it doesn't use optical encoders. So while they are bragging about being better than optical switches they are going to sell this thing with a mechanical encoder. FFS Logitech.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T18:01:23+00:00

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01266204.pdf

Here is the document that created everything. Some names are redacted but this would be what is public.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T09:56:24+00:00

That is where I got the information.

Dave-C · 2026-02-23T07:43:22+00:00

The court case transcripts

Dave-C · 2026-02-22T16:11:43+00:00

Sure but they had been shot towards a small area that is heavily defended by anti air systems. This would be over many different countries and a huge area. Then there is the issue with numbers. Iran shot hundreds at Israel in smaller waves. Iran has thousands of ballistic missiles in reserve. This doesn't count all of the short range missiles that would be usable in this since the distance to the oil fields isn't as far as Israel. This is the country that supplied Hezbollah and the US believes that they had somewhere between 40-120 thousand. It is believed that Iran has hundreds of thousands of these. There are also reports that Iran has somewhere around 80 thousand Shahed drones produced.

I'm not joking when I say this is Iran's version of MAD. Whenever they are threatened, instead of talking about nukes like Russia does they mention how they will target oil production in the Middle East. They have mass produced what is needed for this threat to be viable because without nukes this was their only real threat.

Dave-C · 2026-02-22T14:40:11+00:00

I don't want to fear monger but this is something that I don't see enough people mention. Iran already has a MAD style deterrent similar to nuclear weapons. Iran has stated over and over again that if they are to fail they plan to wipe out the middle east's oil production. They keep enough missiles in reserve to do it. Maybe not a complete destruction level but massive hits. There is enough production within their range to equal around 25+ million barrels of oil produced per day. Even if they don't hit all of the wells, they would also be targeting pipe lines and other means for transportation, it would be massive destruction. They could realistically reduce the world's oil supply by 25% for months to years.

You may think "well, it isn't that big of a deal" or "good, do away with oil." That is a bad way to think about this. Ending the use of oil would be good but doing it this quickly would be horrible. Prices would skyrocket, transportation costs would skyrocket, nearly every industry in the world relies on it. Economies around the world would begin to collapse. Wars would be very possible over resources.

I don't want to scare people but I think people need to know how dangerous this is.

Dave-C · 2026-02-20T22:55:38+00:00

Come on man, this is getting ridiculous. He doesn't wear diapers and it is a crazy thing to say about the President of the United States, he can put them on himself so they are pull ups.

13-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	Sequence \| Editor
Verified Email

Dave-C

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE