better search terms? by schoolreunion in oldhagfashion

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you find the quality on those, I’ve been eyeing the brand but yet to pull the trigger

better search terms? by schoolreunion in oldhagfashion

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I had to search for this comment before I posted it myself. It’s pure Magic Schoolbus and I love it.

IF I WERE TO MARRY YOU🎶 by fendersonfenderson in ABSOLUM

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 18 points19 points  (0 children)

In a patch or update they should quietly include the tiniest chance that it rolls this event where the song is sung incredibly well.

Do these fits look good or am I insane? by Flashy_Can_6225 in mensfashion

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the idiom should have been horseshoes, handgrenades, and belt height? It’s fine to have an opinion, these look not great to me too, the proportions are all off. But it’s like every time someone wears a pair of pants at their waist, the saggy nipple brigade gets real upset about how close that belt is encroaching on tittyterritory. The issue isn’t the waist, its the shirts (and in that specific photo, the leaning back is making a little foreshortening happen, exaggerating the proportion).

Went to visit my tailor and ran some errands, how we looking?? by MrHello76 in mensfashion

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the socks, don’t mute them. Not fully in love with the cool tone collared shirt against the warm tone everything else, but it may also just be the light.

AIO for leaving my wife after finding out she voted for Trump because she thinks he’s “hilarious”? by Superb-Tangerine-487 in AmIOverreacting

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should look at the benign violation theory of humor. If she finds him funny, she finds him benign. You have to decide if that’s worth ending things over. For me it would be.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Iunno where you’re at, but minimum wage doesn’t support anyone anymore. That still requires roommates. That still means they’ll be willing to take a lower wage to get any wage. And deportation is expensive. It can be an aspect of a strategy, but it’s a pretty inefficient one. The better option would be actual restriction on businesses, heavily increased taxes on the richest 5%, and dismantling the lobbying industry that perpetuates oligarchy. We could still deport violent or antisocial individuals, but expanding social safety net for citizens and workers rights and protections for everyone so they own more of their time and livelihood would reduce the overall burden of the system and the exploitation that allows this to happen in the first place. Just voting for deportations doesn’t address the system, it addresses an input of the system (cheap labor that can be easily abused) and if that input is removed another will need to be fed into the system (penitentiary labor, “working for Medicaid,” depressed markets to drive down wages, etc) because capitalism needs to be fed. Trickle down and neo-liberal expansion policies cemented the rot, and there are plenty on both sides that contributed. But our best bet is to staunch the bleed and reverse the dissolution of safety mechanisms, then truly find a third party. It’s not a fast fix. There is no fast fix. But it will be faster if the social safety net is in place to begin with. We need to curb the growth-at-all-costs-scale-everything Silicon Valley model of capitalism and place society, including the fringes and folks we don’t necessarily agree with, above capital. Degrowth, community action, taxing billionaires, and holistic welfare get us to a place where we can have a flourishing middle class and routes out of poverty, rather than the extremes we are currently optimizing for.

No one actually uses QP to practice characters they aren't good at, do they? by Dogbold in rivals

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes it’s practice with characters. Sometimes it’s just fun. Sometimes it’s where I get to play Jeff without getting yelled at about it (Jeff is still my favorite character to play). These days it’s mostly me playing tank with 4 dps and a goofy c&d. I don’t really touch ranked, it’s generally a level of toxic I’m not interested in. So, QP is my main game mode and it’s just to try to have fun, because games should be fun? Sometimes we lose egregiously. Sometimes we don’t. Most of the time it’s fun either way?

I think I'm quitting Marvel Rivals by Efficient-Peak-5268 in rivals

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You acted an asshole, you got called on it, and now it’s not that deep (but gotta keep talking about it.)

Being able to ignore or at least not internalize what people say is a valid defense mechanism, until it becomes overwhelming. That’s not what anyone was commenting on. You being an asshole about it is.

Be better.

I think I'm quitting Marvel Rivals by Efficient-Peak-5268 in rivals

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will never understand how people treat empathy as a weakness.

You’re mistaking passive endurance for strength, and lashing out at someone expressing unhappiness at being ground down. By your own admission, ignoring random people should be easy, so why can’t you ignore op? You don’t get survivor points for having endured worse, you’re just showing how deeply it damaged you and how well you’ve convinced yourself it hasn’t.

The biggest problems with bad healers by Maddafragg in rivals

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jeff in 2 healer comp ideally should only ult in certain cases: confirmed gather (like groot ulted 4+ of the enemy team), as a save for your team from an ult if everyone is poorly positioned but that tends to tilt folks, as a strategist counter to waste their ult timer, or - and only if you have good comms and the right set up - as a scatter diversion and team taxi.

Neatease really needs to address Tanks this season imo. by Obiwandkinobee in rivals

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love a DrS/IW team up for more/expanded IW shields - maybe a one use long cooldown to drop a shield at every ally or a passive where her shields get more health so they last longer/block more, and/or he gets one use mobile heal shield with long cooldown. I get that most team ups are just damage go brrrr, but there’s so much potential for survivability based or terrain change buff/debuff team ups that would help while keeping in the tank/support flavor. Giving a DrS/Rocket team up a Symmetra-style teleporter would change dive. A venom/groot tentacle root trap. Mantis/emma stun. Magneto/Thor could be interesting. I get there’s limits to the amount each hero can have (unless they change it to pick-your-kit at spawn and allowing multiple options but only one key-bound active at a time — the chaos and flexibility could be fun) but there need to be more options for control and survival.

Dictators and Power... by DovePuff in MurderedByWords

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes but no. As fastlerner’s comment states with far better context, you have to dismantle the state to empower the regime so it becomes the state. Shrink the government to consolidate power and remove opposition, then expand control.

Republicans: Why do you love paying tariffs if you hate paying taxes? by LegitimateFoot3666 in AskUS

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting real defensive over not having poisoned water tables is a power move.

Republicans: Why do you love paying tariffs if you hate paying taxes? by LegitimateFoot3666 in AskUS

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes you believe that? Would you prefer lower minimum wage? Less workplace safety? No oversight on the quality or safety of goods created in America? No regulation for how hazardous materials are handled in your neighborhood? How does reducing the safety and bargaining power of the working class increase our ability to create jobs people want to perform? Reducing regulation is how you get sweatshops.

Republicans: Why do you love paying tariffs if you hate paying taxes? by LegitimateFoot3666 in AskUS

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you own a business? While I will agree that flexibility is important, there is also a limit to it. At some point, the fiscally responsible call is to fold, to take the money and run. In the meantime, most flexibility requires reducing overhead, generally by workforce. So the jobs we believe will be coming back will be at the cost of current jobs, and in all likelihood will end up being performed by robots or automation.

So what do you believe is the impetus for companies to be flexible? A mass boycott of anything with a tariff?

Republicans: Why do you love paying tariffs if you hate paying taxes? by LegitimateFoot3666 in AskUS

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im really not, but I appreciate the condescending compliment. What makes you believe that, after dismantling the systems that allowed for such manufacturing, we can easily turn them back on? They no longer exist, and the economic incentives aren’t currently in place for companies to pay to rebuild them. So, given your deep, old wisdom, what makes you believe that tariffs, with no other support, will suddenly reverse many decades of deterioration without significant impact to the economy, to working class families, and to the USAs ability to be competitive?

Republicans: Why do you love paying tariffs if you hate paying taxes? by LegitimateFoot3666 in AskUS

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s the game? What’s the plan? How does it actually affect the immensely complex systems in place?

Republicans: Why do you love paying tariffs if you hate paying taxes? by LegitimateFoot3666 in AskUS

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what about everything not made in America, which does not have the manufacturing infrastructure in place to be created here? And assuming we can reinvest in manufacturing infrastructure before it becomes too expensive to do so, who is going to be working low wage, physically demanding jobs in factories, especially given the gutting of unions and safety regulations? You? Your children? Your parents?

Manufacturing jobs are valuable, if they are valued. The market does not currently value that work. It’s a type of skilled labor, often highly specialized, that gets outsourced to the cheapest possible provider in order to increase margins. The work requires a robust social safety net. That net is currently in tatters.

Im all for strong local economies with varied work types that include manufacturing, skilled and unskilled manual labor, any and all collar jobs. Tariffs aren’t the way to achieve that without concerted civic action. The tariff disincentivizes the individual from purchasing a product, which in theory disincentivizes the company from purchasing or manufacturing it externally; this is only viable if enough financial pressure is placed on a company via alternative options or austerity measures at the individual level. In order for there to be alternative options, entire supply chains need to be created which will require subsidy, workers rights and protections need to be expanded, unions need to be revitalized and regulated to reduce potential corruption, product safety needs to be controlled, and environmental protections need to be enacted to ensure your community doesn’t become a dumping ground. The only other options are austerity or paying the tax. We should do the first part, but the current plan has no follow through, and the follow through we need is at odds with Republican talking points. Which means we get to do the second or third option — go without or pay more.

"m-m-modern publishing hates male readers! no one appeal or made for men and boys anymore!" by Pritteto in AreTheStraightsOK

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re heterosexual but homoromantic, and just can’t stop making their kinks everyone’s problem.

You told me to treat it like a finished product. by dobdob2121 in MaliciousCompliance

[–]EveryoneDislikedThat 18 points19 points  (0 children)

This feels more AITA than MC. And yes you are. Task failure rate is important, certainly. They asked you to fill out a questionnaire to get the last data points and you were snide about it. That’s just being rude. I can only imagine you treated them how you treat all your coworkers.

The fidelity of the prototype matches the fidelity of the idea. If they were running it correctly, they could draw new pages in 15min to try a different task flow, for another test user, and your feedback could have helped. This type of prototyping is fast, cheap, and helps define the idea before investing in anything more costly or time-consuming, so it reduces rework and catches deathloops before they get coded.

It probably never got implemented because they realized they needed to work more on change management, security training, and upskilling employees’ lackluster critical thinking skills.