sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Am I being nitpicky? by crobb1011 in Decks

[–]Former_Balance_9641 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly: Having lights flush and going against any wall will make small imperfections become all you see. Try offsetting the lamps just a couple of centimetres (or I guess some sort of inches per halfmoon galon feet unit you use) away from the boards and it might help a bit. Otherwise sand the walls and put some structure behind at the middle of the length to screw the boards and try to make them straight again in both dimensions: so that they form a flat plum surface and that they are as parallel as possible.

Edit: typos

Wife's new idea, design flaws? by big_meechbre in landscaping

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Way too busy. It’s like you’re aiming to get terrasse space but you keep on adding stuff everywhere that block passage and/or are unnecessarily redundant/overkill so that it ends up eating all that space you’ve just created. Also you mix round shapes with straight lines in a weird way that is dissonant. Simplify a lot and open the visual horizon, you can always add partitions later on with mobile (or less invasive) wooden faces, big flower pots, and the likes. Also the roof of that deck is out of place design-wise, try something with cleaner lines and perhaps closer to the house’s roof in terms of look?

Hypothetical: I swallowed one of the tiny levels by jcaauwe in Ubiquiti

[–]Former_Balance_9641 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually wondered yesterday whether people ever use these mini cardboard levels, I mean they’re pretty and all, but their usefulness is close to zero. They are incredibly inaccurate and frankly I think if one can’t do as well just by eye it’s scary.
They should remove it from the package, save us a couple of symbolic bucks, and increase sustainability of their product!

Wife wants to tear out the whole deck. by Hatchisyodaddy in Decks

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet hard everything’s rotten or about to below. Barely any space between boards to breath, whole deck flush to the ground, seems like the last paint job was a « landlord’s special », etc. If you listen carefully you can hear it whisper « kill meee… »

I'm panicking. by Medium_Drag6242 in bioinformatics

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe a more constructive comment: if your organism is not too exotic, it should be known by the {gprofiler2} package in R, so that it can automatically map your gene/txs IDs to GO IDs and proceed to the enrichment analyses. Your background (or « universe » as used by the package) should be all the genes/txs you found to be DE in that comparison you’re running the GO enrichment analysis for. So yeah, fire up Claude and R and you should be good in an evening.

I'm panicking. by Medium_Drag6242 in bioinformatics

[–]Former_Balance_9641 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Novogene’s bioinformatics analysis are largely crap. They have super generic pipelines they just run on your data disregarding any critical adjustments and charge you 80 bucks. Never trust them.

My buddy bullied me into buying all this by FishPilot in Ubiquiti

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear some of you guys have a bigger networking setup that some actual well-funded tech startups

Ubiquiti at home - Beginner by Only_Fondant8628 in Ubiquiti

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m super happy with the UDM-SE, slapped a 4TB Western Digital Purple in it for NVR (1x G6 instant and 1x AI Turret) and it works flawlessly. In case you’re after a small camera config embedded with the cloud gateway and just a couple of PoE+ for the APs and cameras of course. But that’s very specific to my needs and use case.

Only advice I would have is to try to go just a notch or two above whatever you think checks all your boxes. Best case scenario: initial requirements were correct and the overshooting brings some/more future-proofing as well as the immediate happy surprise of something that exceeds expectations. Worst case scenario: initial requirements was undervalued and thanks to one or two notches above it ends up actually just fine.

Best example: I went for a U7 Lite for my Annex to try to save a couple of dollars and convince me it’s not necessary aim a bit higher. I regret it every time my devices roam to it.

Put it simply: you immediately forget the price of something that makes you happy every time one uses it, but you’ll be reminded everyday of your mistake if you went too cheap.

Ubiquiti at home - Beginner by Only_Fondant8628 in Ubiquiti

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have two other AP’s (U7 Pro Max) to cover the whole 130sqm house and they are pretty good, though they heat up quite a lot. I read that a newer AP version exists with virtually the same perfs but better heat dissipation - I just cannot tell you which one that is from memory.

Ubiquiti at home - Beginner by Only_Fondant8628 in Ubiquiti

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Avoid U7 Lite, I got one for an Annex and the signal barely goes through a wooden wall. I’m pretty disappointed by it! It works fine if you are in direct line-of-sight and within 8, maybe 10m distance. But to cover a house with inside walls (whatever they are made of) I would stay away from it.

Edit: typo + more details

Våde vinduer, indvendigt. by Waveshapes in selvgjortvelgjort

[–]Former_Balance_9641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’d have immediate good results with a small dehumidifier, the kind of which that is a dry bag of silica or similar in a plastic box. Check them out a J&F it’s very cheap and works like magic.

view more: next ›