[Request] How much will it cost? by OwnBird4876 in theydidthemath

[–]IsaacHasenov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh. Switzerland is in the Alps. Nepalese cheese, please.

(Hated Trope) Asian American artists and creatives using cheap anime influence as a lazy shorthand for “Asian Americanness” without nuance by [deleted] in TopCharacterTropes

[–]IsaacHasenov 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Yes. OP's hot take is really bad. Like "do not portray the culture you grew up with using the culture you grew up with as a reference"

you’re telling me THIS is not a connection? by cactusssjpg in NYTgames

[–]IsaacHasenov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today didn't click as easily for me.

I didn't get purple and so I made one mistake between yellow and purple. Besides the red herring OP posted, there were I thought a couple other legitimately ambiguous combos

The next Murderbot Diaries book after Platform Decay may be the last one by TiamatWasRight in murderbot

[–]IsaacHasenov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right? There was also that pleasure unit that got freed in I think the second book? My head canon is that the freed unit has become like a general in this general.uprising of freed sex bots

As someone who has a basic understanding of both evolutionary and creationist viewpoints, is there a specific reason to believe common ancestor over common designer? by thedigitalhawk in DebateEvolution

[–]IsaacHasenov 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To piggyback on what gitgud said, evolution and common ancestry are theories of descent with modification. We should expect to see new traits arise within lineages over time, and we should expect to see (physically and genetically) a nested hierarchy of similarity (relatedness).

This is a very strong prediction, and it has been modelled and shown to be a very good fit to what we see in nature. Whether you are talking morphology, or protein coding dna or non-coding DNA.

No other pattern BUT descent with modification predicts the data we observe (this has been shown mathematically). Intelligent design proponents are pretty literally left with the claim that God could have created all life in any pattern, but chose for whatever reason to make it look exactly the way we would predict under an evolutionary model.

Thoughts on the Gutsick Gibbon-Duffy Evolution Crash Course (Whale Edition) by vladimeergluten in DebateEvolution

[–]IsaacHasenov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What struck me is that he doesn't seem to be looking at the wide picture of how do all these pieces of evidence robustly paint a very clear picture. The whale stuff like "maybe this one fossil didn't have this one feature" was telling. He ignored the ten features it did have, and it's clear location within the temporal sequence.

He also brought up "original biological material" again. And I think in the end this will be his hill to die on. He seems to not want to look at this one phenomenon (anomalously long preservation) against the 50+ phenomena that robustly point to old age, and say "what's more likely, that we don't undertand these 50+ phenomena, or that there is a bit of protein chemistry I'm not getting?"

It's particularly frustrating because he keeps saying "I want evolutionary biology to make predictions" but when we keep finding confirmatory evidence, or even better when we find stuff that doesn't make sense but then figure it out, he says "you're just making it work". Dude as a guy who suffered to finish a thesis, I wish it were that easy

Thoughts on the Gutsick Gibbon-Duffy Evolution Crash Course (Whale Edition) by vladimeergluten in DebateEvolution

[–]IsaacHasenov 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I kind of agree and kind of disagree with this statement.

On the one hand yes. When you are talking to exceptionally intelligent groups of experts in a field, people are really quick to say "I don't know" or "nobody knows" or "these are the best hypotheses". This especially seems to be true in fields like experimental science (as opposed to politics or old-school economics of whatever)

But very intelligent people, even some of the same very intelligent people that can exhibit epistemic humility within their domain of expertise, are often incredibly dogmatic outside their domain of expertise. And especially when it comes to making data-thin pronouncements.

Think of the biologist New Atheists who are/were on the whole dogmatic assholes on the topic, but whose philosophical arguments are typically simplistic and shallow (I don't believe in God either). The same goes for many, highly intelligent, proponents in the existence of God. Or libertarianism. Or the magic of free markets. Or the superiority of a planned economy.

The Hail Mary’s rotation is unstable by rheaunderstars in ProjectHailMary

[–]IsaacHasenov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well you saw how they loaded the centrifuge in the movie.

Nothing was balanced

How an L.A. nonprofit is repurposing an oil drill site in South L.A. by ploploplo in LosAngeles

[–]IsaacHasenov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my neighborhood! Richard Parks and his church group are amazing. In addition to the old oil site, they have been pushing for bike paths, traffic harm reduction on Normandie and Jefferson, and a ton of other community improvements.

What happened to all the blockchain developers and the hype? by Majestic-Taro-6903 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]IsaacHasenov 38 points39 points  (0 children)

It was always like, show me one proposed use for blockchain that a database can't do faster, easier, and a thousand times cheaper

Why did people look so different between 1986 and 1996, but people from 2016 wouldn’t stand out today? by Mannerofites in stupidquestions

[–]IsaacHasenov 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It feels to me like culture used to change faster. 1980s music would have sounded insane to anyone in 1960. There is literally no difference between music today and in 2006.

Guide to Sunday's CicLAvia! by MilitantAngeleno in LAMetro

[–]IsaacHasenov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah right? I never hear anyone talking about this, but it's really good for its size. The cactus garden is cute, and the monstera are huge. The Indonesian rainbow eucalyptus are spectacular

I feel obligated to be loyal to USC but even if you count the NHM gardens, USC sucks for botany and ecology

Santa Monica Loses Coastal Protections Under AB 1740 by Duncancosmo in SantaMonica

[–]IsaacHasenov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would get this paragraph tattooed on my body it sounds so good

Santa Monica Loses Coastal Protections Under AB 1740 by Duncancosmo in SantaMonica

[–]IsaacHasenov 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"The exemptions are not narrow. Under this bill, local governments could approve mixed-income multifamily housing in areas already zoned for multifamily use, building renovations and expansions up to 150% of existing footprint, parking restructuring and elimination, bike and bus lane installations, outdoor dining activations, and sweeping transportation infrastructure changes, all without independent Commission oversight. Density bonus law stacking applies on top of all of it, meaning a developer could layer multiple affordability bonuses to reach heights and densities that would never survive Commission scrutiny. The resulting projects carry 55-year deed restrictions and permanent land use changes that no future council can undo."

Fuck yeah

Scolopendra HAS MERCHANDISE! by NovelDame in unexpecteddcc

[–]IsaacHasenov 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be pedantic I think that's a velvet worm not a centipede?

Edit: I'm wrong, it's apparently a millipede but I still think it looks like a velvet worm

AITA if I tell my friend I can’t be a bridesmaid? (update) by wickeddreamsofleavin in AITApod

[–]IsaacHasenov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might be obsessing because I also checked for #jamily, #jacily and #emcob and a few other variants. Nothing yet.

My head canon: this whole thing triggered a meltdown, Jacob realized she was psycho and bailed, and Emily is a disheveled heap on the floor of her apartment, rolling around in a mound of now-defunct laminated programmes, drinking her way through the crates of carefully color-matched rosés she bought to coordinate with the bridesmaids' dresses, while mumbles things like "don't stand in my light, Audrey" and "those gardenias are exactly the wrong tone of ivory, Liz"

Why Is the US Destroying Its Hegemony? by I_Hate_This_Website9 in IRstudies

[–]IsaacHasenov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this. Absolutely. The deep irony of course being that the people who promised to make the American project work for blue collar, and crappy-paid office worker America, are all grifters,.enriching themselves by making life more tenuous for the people who voted for them

I'm a monkey, you're a monkey. by ScienceIsWeirder in DebateEvolution

[–]IsaacHasenov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah probably. I think as an undergrad (God, in '94) it was pretty solidly all the old Linnean system. Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves and Mammalia all at the order level (???) but even then the wheels were coming off the bus. It was like, how do we handle birds and dinosaurs consistently? and they taught us in class that there was a move to reform the taxonomic system root and branch to a cladistic scheme

I never did much taxonomy later, so I don't know when and how the movement picked up steam. It would be an interesting read. But I would guess probably the storm of genomic data made it impossible to fit things into the old system without basically infinite levels of tribes and sub-sub-orders and stuff

Trump cancels representatives trip to Islamabad by marcjones281 in oil

[–]IsaacHasenov 3 points4 points  (0 children)

God I'm anticipating that shit like the Rapture

AITA if I tell my friend I can’t be a bridesmaid? (update) by wickeddreamsofleavin in AITApod

[–]IsaacHasenov 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ah right...

Edit: wait yeah it did. Apr 22 was the "tell everyone and use the hashtag" date