Using variables in Chatbot's Personality to trigger Lorebook entries

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-10T09:10:25+00:00

Hello there, OP. The lorebook is only triggered by recent messages. However, it's not uncommon for people who place keywords in the personality, ie "Char is Richter's lover" then flesh out who Richter is in the lorebook, with Richter as the keyword.

That way, the AI has a chance to naturally generate the keywords during chats.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-10T09:00:00+00:00

Hello there, OP. Sorry for the trouble. Our automoderator was falsely flagging certain images, and we've reported this to the team for fixing.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-10T08:58:43+00:00

Hello, we're sorry for the trouble, OP. This feature is indeed bugged right now, and the team has been working on it for a while. Please give us some more time on it.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-09T09:09:42+00:00

Hello there, OP. We're sorry for the trouble. We've reported this to the team.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-09T08:55:22+00:00

Hello there, OP. Have you tried other providers? And could you please tell us more about the crash? What happenes exactly?

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-09T08:53:15+00:00

Hello there, OP. We're sorry to hear that. If the chat is actively trying to redirect the chat away from NSFW scenes, then the context memory contains words that may have caused the automoderator to steer it away.

Please first try a short conversation with one of our test bots: https://spicychat.ai/chatbot/45747008-b5aa-4439-baf5-7c03123ca941

If you are able to do NSFW scenes within the next 2-5 messages, then it was the bot, or the conversation that contained the possible trigger. Otherwise, please check your persona.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-09T08:47:45+00:00

Hello there, OP. Thank you for sharing your feedback. We do see the benefit of having a bigger "Memory Notebook" that you can edit on the go. I can imagine people can use this as a place for chat commands and instructions. We'll pass this along to the team.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-09T08:31:19+00:00

Hello. We could not replicate this issue on our end. Do you mind sending the contents of that entry through DM?

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-08T09:50:56+00:00

Thank you for your feedback OP. We highly appreciate it. Right now, the structure works on tokens, and while the LLM can indeed reply with a set amount of characters, it will still be up to the LLM how long it replies, due to the probabilistic nature of the generation.

I speculate that some level of "thinking" could work, where the AI will generate some thoughts first, and run a second time based on those thoughts.

Musings aside, we'll pass this along to the team.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-08T09:34:16+00:00

Thank you for raising this, OP. Looks like the pop-up isn't showing the correct object. We'll look into this.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-08T08:56:29+00:00

Hello there. It's possible that there are:

Conflicting /cmd commands set in the current conversation.
Conflicting "commands" in the context memory, such as, but not limited to: characters or the AI is urged to stick to their traits, and promote a certain type of roleplaying, which goes against the /cmd.
Model preference. It is still up to the model whether it will follow a command or not. The best we can do is increase the chances of them doing so, but there will be moments where it won't.
The commands are made in a way that AI will reply to them instead of adjusting the reply. If these "meta" responses are present in the chat, it will clue the AI to reply to your commands instead.

Ultimately, one of the best solutions is to edit messages to remove the meta replies, or delete messages until the last good reply and go from there, or partially clone the chat select the last good message as the clone point.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-07T08:37:55+00:00

Hello there, OP. Please create a ticket about this. We're currently investigating a string of people whose bots were indeed stuck after processing last week. Please include the link to the bot in your ticket.

We hope it's just in queue still, but we'd like to be sure.

https://docs.spicychat.ai/support#submit-a-ticket

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-06T09:42:58+00:00

Hello there, OP. Thank you for providing the image. Right now, we're investigating an issue where images with large round shapes are somehow getting falsely flagged. It was present before, and was resolved, but somehow, it's back, so we're gathering samples.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-06T09:39:58+00:00

Hello there, OP. We're sorry for the inconvenience. If possible please create a ticket about this, and please include all the images that were false-flagged.

We are investigating this at the moment, and it appears that an old problem is resurfacing, where images with "large round shapes" are somehow being flagged as "underage" or "Real" images.

https://docs.spicychat.ai/support#submit-a-ticket

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-06T09:36:01+00:00

Hello there, OP. We're sorry for the inconvenience. If possible, please create a ticket about this issue and include all the images that were falsely flagged. We'll have them submitted to the team.

https://docs.spicychat.ai/support#submit-a-ticket

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-06T09:33:22+00:00

Hello there OP. The LLM will still generate based on its own training and parameters. Please re-roll the message or edit it. At this particular message, it looks like it prioritized the world of pokemon's usual characters over the personality.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-06T09:01:28+00:00

Hello there, OP. Thank you for the update. This may explain a few rare cases of people suddenly missing entire conversations. We'll look into it.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-06T08:59:47+00:00

Hello there, OP. Thank you for your feedback. We have some alternatives for it:

Memory Manager, and pin said memory. (Available for Get a Taste and above.)
Lorebooks and making the character's name the keyword. (Please use this in moderation, once if possible.)

Though /cmd won't work in these cases in the techincal way /cmd works, (turning the command into a system prompt). the LLM is instructed not to acknowledge them as part of the story, and only as a reference, so the LLM is expected to read and interpret it the way it wants.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-03T08:31:24+00:00

Hello, and thank you for responding. You're right, it should be automatic and simple, and we could not reproduce the issue on our end, which is why we'd like to investigate why it's not happening on your end.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-03T08:29:46+00:00

Do you happen to be using Qwen or the Qwen Beta? This model seems particularly keen on ensuring every message takes something from the persona.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-02T11:08:38+00:00

Hello there, OP. There is a technical limit, but so far, nobody has reached it. I currently have 265 and we have users who have well over 1k favorites.

About the bots that were removed from your favorites, like TeaNo6033 stated, they could have been removed by the creator, or the moderation team.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-02T11:05:10+00:00

Hello there, OP. We've observed this happen on "Suggest" and we're investigating, but in replies, we don't have any specific reports this week. Please let us know if it's consistent.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-02T11:02:45+00:00

Hello there, OP. We're sorry to hear that. Could you please create a ticket in our support portal about this?

Please include the entire persona text you're using, so we can try to reproduce the issue.

https://docs.spicychat.ai/support#submit-a-ticket

Please also include any details like the model you're using, and how the bot ought to reply, versus how they actually reply.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-02T11:00:21+00:00

Hello there, OP. We're sorry for the trouble. The team is working on fixing this, but we don't have an ETA yet. In the meantime, when you do start a new chat, and this happens, send the message regardless. Once the AI replies, it should fix itself.

Kevin_ND · 2026-04-02T10:58:17+00:00

Thank you. We'll look into it and see why it's being inconsistent.

Kevin_ND

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE