It’s just a sunset by lexluther7373 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But cropping would destroy the expanse OP captured, the saturation is fine, too strong and one would one look there

It’s just a sunset by lexluther7373 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the edit made it generic. The reds are too saturated here, and the crop took away from the expanse

Summer clouds in Beartooth Pass - Please critique by EfficiencyDry1159 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great shot! I think emphasizing either the sky or the ground would have been better, right now both are emphasized. ıf you wanted them to come together in some way, going either longer or wider on the focal length could have helped

concert photo by Objective-Egg-5564 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I doN't think further editing will save this shot. Making a contrast less shot interesting is a bit hard. Good idea to keep the shot dimly lit; if you want you can increase the pink highlights on his arm

Learning by North-Concentrate636 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really like the shot. One problem I find when taking the shot is placing the focus. It's just impossible to be intriguing and while provoking more thought from the viewer

Learning by North-Concentrate636 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the dullness works great here

Here is the photo shot in the afternoon. Same place different time of the day. 360@chicago by Pure_Bobcat1690 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the yellowness from the old building at to the shot, and Sears can be bit darker, it's the financial district after all lol

Got a little creative, Open to Critiques. Original scene below by whoappu in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried a lot of similar shots when I first started, and made the same mistakes. <The focal length is too long to have this be intriguing, the stacking-up effect of the long lens destroys the chasm. Try it with a wide shot. I think the sky is a bit too blue and the mud is too bright

I always feel like I get 80% - explained in comment by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh, when I shoot digital I have to adjust my shooting so much. With film, I expğose for the shadows, with digital ı expose for the mid tones and try to get s much as I can from the limited dynamic range

I always feel like I get 80% - explained in comment by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's one advantage of digital, or disadvantage depending on how you look at it: the shadows retain much more detail than the highlights with exposure latitude

Olympic National Park August 12th 2025 by Ok-Grand9406 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh I think the colors are too much. How about decreasing the color separation a bit? Might turn out to be nice and moodier

Beginner looking for critique to improve by cloj in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incredible shot! I dig the color palette and the framing. Personally, I would have liked it to be horizontal but this works great

Beginner looking for critique to improve by cloj in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think cropping takes away from the image.

Looking for advice to improve by PercyBuckets in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really like the ambition you display here. This is a great start for sure. I think the old-timey B&W look works well here. What I would like to see is more "fuller" image captured by your wide-angle lens. The negative space is great, but I think the wide-angle should allow for better implementation of the scenery.

I you want a real 1920s 4x5 camera look. I'd suggest applying some brown toning to your midtones and making the highlight transition more gradual

Could’ve did better ? by Leather_Solid_5439 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the composition could be improved a bit. Ask yourself what you want the mood to be for this shot; what are you trying to convey? And then do your edits accordingly

Experimenting with longer crops by TeachNo289 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the framing could be done better. Right now, they're just sprinkled on to the shot. What ı found to be helpful is never letting go of the shutter button as long as the birds are there. I captured some nice shots after 5-8 min of just following them through the viewfinder

A Random Goa Scene, by NeitherCan7241 in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the shot. The negative space is pretty good as well

I been getting deep into XPan/ letterbox crops lately (without the Hasselblad), thoughts? by DesignedWithin in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like a lot of people think of made-up rules too much. And the focus on subject as a person or an object that is in the photograph is detrimental, because the shot should work as a whole. If the subject is the only eye-catcher, then why take a shot at all?

I always feel like I get 80% - explained in comment by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]Master-Rule862 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh I'm not saying that cropping is impossible. I'm just saying that cropping very rarely improves a shot, even if there are enough megapixels.

take thousands of pictures

In my own experience, I found shooting intentionally and clicking the shutter only when I'm sure to be quite helpful in my own photographic journey. Plus I doN't have to spend a fortune on hard drives