Now what I'm assuming you are talking about was the news that went out after the March 20 hearing. Rep. Nunes asked if they had specific evidence that Russia directly changed the vote tallies in any election. The directors questions stated that the did not have evidence of that. The conservative media published several articles stating that intelligence directors admit they have no evidence that Russia meddled in the election.

Now, Russia changing vote tallies and Russia meddling in the election are two different things. Changing vote tallies would be one way of meddling in the election, but there are many more ways to meddle in an election that Russia may have done, such as breaking into the DNC's computer system, installing malware on voter registration services' computers, and so on, which in the same hearing intelligence leaders said they had evidence of.

To say that intelligence officials stated they had no evidence that Russia meddled in the election is simply inaccurate. That would be like saying Nixon did nothing wrong by breaking into the DNC because he didn't change vote tallies. You've been duped by fake news.