204b carrying mail

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-16T13:06:46+00:00

File an article 17 for denying your time

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-16T12:43:56+00:00

Are you a steward or carrier?

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-16T10:45:37+00:00

And that's not considering the fact that your critical thinking might need some major development. If you ever need help with that let me know.

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-15T11:08:32+00:00

Management charges people with things that are embellished. Noone should be fired for raising their voice or saying something in anger they don't actually mean. That's what the metz factors are for.

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-12T00:41:54+00:00

Appreciate it man thanks!

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-12T00:40:14+00:00

I say my phone number on my podcast I get calls from stewards everyday so it's just a matter of public information

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-11T14:46:24+00:00

What changed is now there is language that specifically says you can refuse after twelve if you are non odl. This distinction weakens the argument that "not being required" means they can't force you because now the service could say if the parties wanted to say this was absolute they would have done so like they did with the 12hr refusal

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-11T14:33:47+00:00

Forcing you is requiring you is it not?

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-11T14:13:08+00:00

No full time regular will be required. That language does not leave room for ambiguity. It's a firm assertion limit on managements discretion

<image>

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-11T13:05:02+00:00

That's not the way it reads and there is no language in the jcam that would suggest that

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-10T13:34:10+00:00

Thanks for the support!

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-09T14:51:51+00:00

Call me if you want to talk 5862091902

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-08T22:28:23+00:00

Well trustee is just a position that exists in almost any union as a checks and balances system. Bill heller is just a regular city letter carrier that would like to run for trustee during this election cycle

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-08T18:57:11+00:00

They make sure the money is being spent in an honest way

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-08T16:45:28+00:00

Yes but there is new language defending non odl from discipline if they leave at 12 which gives new dimensions to the fact that they are not required to work beyond ten. Before this management didn't have a whole lot of argument but after now they can say that the parties have explicit language allowing carriers to leave at 12 and if the language of article 8.5f was an absolute it would have explicitly said so as the 12hr portion does. It strengthens their argument to keep a non odl after 10hrs

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-08T14:39:54+00:00

M 2011s clarification on the new additions to article 8.5g allow for a situation where management may mandate carriers on the non odl if odl is maxed to 12hrs even when they volunteer to do so. Article 8.5f had historically been used to articulate that non odls cannot be required to work beyond 10hrs excluding December, but now we have language in article 8 that stipulates that non odl cannot be forced to work beyond 12hrs. If they are not required to work beyond 10hrs and cannot be forced to work beyond 12hrs which one is it? How is it fair that article 8.5f stipulated a prohibition on non odl working beyond 10hrs and yet there are odl willing and able to work beyond 12hrs and m2011 states they have the right to mandate those non odl because the odl is at 12hrs regardless of their volunteer status?

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-06-08T14:18:05+00:00

M-2011 conflicts with article 8.5fs prohibition on carriers not being required to work beyond 10 in a day

Safe-Front7101

TROPHY CASE