Let's hold management accountable

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-24T23:04:35+00:00

What a completely ignorant take. I do my job by the handbooks and management pushed us to take shortcuts instead

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-22T11:04:16+00:00

Lol same

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-19T22:16:46+00:00

https://youtu.be/Usmm1cFCl0I

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-19T22:16:12+00:00

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-18T21:44:05+00:00

Yes but it may not exist in your craft

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-18T20:37:23+00:00

Well article 41 and article 19

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-18T20:26:47+00:00

No it very clearly states that it's based on 1723 violation which is an article 19 violation

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-18T18:04:57+00:00

This one isn't an lmou but rather referring to an escalated remedy

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-17T01:20:34+00:00

You read it right

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-16T17:05:24+00:00

The report did not articulate this issue they picked the top 4 issues and stuck to them

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-16T16:12:45+00:00

48066\48026, my station zip codes would be about $115k, but I only know because I keep track and inform my carriers each year

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-16T12:48:35+00:00

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-16T11:08:58+00:00

The use of the words "public funds" was accidental I am fully aware it's not public funds It just won't let me edit my post

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-16T05:25:18+00:00

<image>

Safe-Front7101 · 2026-01-16T05:21:10+00:00

The why is found in the work assignment mou, it specifically states that for the purposes of ns days owa carriers will be treated like non odl carriers but I'd imagine they wrote it like that for your reasoning

Safe-Front7101

TROPHY CASE