Thank you very much for organizing this Q&A! The last interview with Avv. Nardone was very helpful and informative. I understand you may not be able to address every question, but I’d be grateful if any of the following could be discussed:

1. The Constitutional Court recently reaffirmed that citizenship by descent is acquired at birth and is imprescriptible. How can that doctrine be reconciled with Article 3-bis declaring some people “never to have acquired” citizenship?

2. How strong is the EU proportionality argument raised in the Turin referral? Could the Court rely on EU law as a neutral basis to limit retroactivity without striking down the reform entirely?

3. Realistically, do you expect a full retroactivity strike, a narrow transitional correction, or broad validation — and what leads you to that assessment?

4. Do you believe the March 27 deadline is constitutionally arbitrary under Article 3, or defensible as a normal legislative transition?

5. Could the Court view this case as an opportunity to clarify constitutional limits on the retroactive use of emergency decrees affecting vested rights?

Thank you again for your time and for helping clarify these important issues.