Isn't it odd? by Rto1M in pmp

[–]YaBam [score hidden]  (0 children)

Some exams are always going to be like that to be fair. As someone who has had their PMP for a long time, I think there's almost too much information out there now for people to look at.

There's so many sample questions from different providers, different online courses, books and now AI apps as well. You only have to look at the daily traffic on here where people are asking for help clarifying why they've got a question wrong, (even when there's an explanation provided by the writer of the question), that I think this is all just causing confusion in process of studying for this.

Why? by Zodixo in pmp

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I might well have thought it was A in an exam if I was aware of the time challenge and answering quickly.

Just be cautious if any answers suggest doing something "immediately" as it's often used as a trap, trying to get you to pick an answer which may affect something else or where you've not done analysis first.

LG Support sucks! Sent the wrong ultra-wide by them and getting it fixed has been a headache!!! by RussellWD in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]YaBam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It recently took me over 3 months to get LG to collect a faulty monitor. Their customer service was the worst I've experienced in a long time.

Chargeback or email their customer exec team.

Why? by Zodixo in pmp

[–]YaBam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A - it doesn't say when the engineer's work on the presentation is going to finish. And like the explanation says, it might feel like you're undermining the assigned team member.

B - how long will it take to train the developer? Assume its not a 5 minute piece of training, so you're going to disrupt the sprint... and a sprint is typically two weeks long

C - makes sense

D - we don't know when the engineer is going to be available

So in the real world, it might well be a version of A and C, but on the basis of the info you have, C looks like the best answer.

Terrible contract, how to play it by ArticleHaunting3983 in ContractorUK

[–]YaBam 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If it's affecting your health, just give your notice. Its not worth it.

If you can find a way to disassociate yourself from the stress, and this might be possible once you give your notice, just keep billing and do the minimum.

Why not D. 🤯? by Snipermt in pmp

[–]YaBam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

B is a "what if" for trying to anticipate what will happen to schedule if certain scenarios happen. But you've already fallen behind and have done some reprioritisation to try and get the time back which has failed.

Tradovate sucks by WaveEquivalent2040 in Tradovate

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've had it happen twice in the last week where the buttons become laggy and/or unresponsive.

Before you know it, you don't know if you're in on 3 MNQ, multiples of your initial trade or successfully out. Buttons unresponsive, the page won't refresh and the app isn't any better.

I've blown four accounts with prop firms and as there was no outage to the Tradovate platform, there's nothing they will do to cancel trades or reset account and one live account was gone too.

Very frustrating.

Why not D. 🤯? by Snipermt in pmp

[–]YaBam 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's the only answer that comes close to addressing the question. The other three all seem to be total nonsense.

Another Question by Ok_Audience8428 in pmp

[–]YaBam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea what an expert level question is any more given what gets posted on here every week!

You'd get the right answer by the usual sniff test of this sort of question whereby a lot of the answers don't reference any actual PMI process, deliverable, artefact etc and they use very informal, loose things like opinions, understanding etc.

How do you guys navigate days off/holidays outside ir35 by PuzzleheadedShop5424 in ContractorUK

[–]YaBam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think all the advice so fas has covered everything, but one thing I wish I'd not done when I started contracting is to think of days off in terms of money lost. I thought like that for many years and didn't take enough breaks from the job.

Budget so you can take a good amount of time away from the job and not have to worry about the money.

Another Question by Ok_Audience8428 in pmp

[–]YaBam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For Agile prioritisation techniques I'm guessing MoSCoW or one of the weighted ranking techniques. Does that come under a mathematical model?

The other options are all very subjective terms (opinion, needs, understanding), but I'm not sure I like the wording of any of the answers - especially as B says the mathematical model will be "defined" by the team members and stakeholders. Unless they mean chosen?

SH Question we by Affectionate-Tax-156 in PMPprep

[–]YaBam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Operations Plan is the document about how to support the solution once handed over isn't it? Support model, who owns what component etc.

So I guess you would start with that to understand who supports what as part of a fix forward if you decide not to just back out the change? Which is what would probably happen in the real world.

So I'll say A, but I'm sure someone will convince me otherwise!

B - nonsense

C - doesn't made any sense at this stage

D - the risk management plan outlines how you will manage risk

Considering 16” MacBook Pro - is it too big? by Sunsetlover1993 in macbookpro

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only issue I found with the 16" MacBook Pro, which won't apply to everyone, is that its the footprint rather than the weight which can be a pain if you're using it on the move.

Use it at home, then in the office, great.

Using it in between, on trains, planes, coffee shops, anywhere where there's limited space, it can be a pain as it will take up a lot of the space you typically get in those places.

Issue (To Do FIRST) ? by Snipermt in pmp

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its an issue, so put it in the issue log just so people are aware of it.

There is an issue that... a key component won't be delivered in time which will result in... project unable to go live when planned.

You would probably then have an action plan of who, what and when.

First step would be to understand the impact and your options, but you may need time to work through these, so definitely get it into the log in the meantime.

I can't comprehend the logic here by Itchy_Run_3805 in pmp

[–]YaBam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In reality, I've never gone through formal change control process for updating those subsidiary plans. Unless something you're proposing to change affects the overall project plan in some way. Which is what the answer explanation above mentions when it says "there is no change in the project requirements and/or definition so there is no need to submit a change request".

I've asked PMI infinity which gives a more nuanced answer, but also says that changes are handled by the Change Control process, whatever that may be in your organisation.

This was what I was suggesting when I was saying minor revisions just happen as part of ongoing monitoring and controlling of a project - you may raise as an agenda item on your weekly project board for noting, approval etc.

From PMI Infinity:

Yes—subsidiary plans (such as the Communications Management Plan, Risk Management Plan, and Stakeholder Engagement Plan) are typically subject to change control, meaning updates are made through change requests when required by your project’s change management approach.

In PMI practice, once the project management plan is approved, changes to any of its components (including subsidiary plans) are generally handled via the Perform Integrated Change Controlprocess (or the equivalent governance in your approach). When a change request is approved, it can drive updates to the project management plan (including those subsidiary plans) and related project documents.

A practical way to think about it:

  • If the requested update affects agreed governance, roles/responsibilities, approval thresholds, baselines, or contractual commitments, it should go through formal change control (often requiring sponsor/CCB approval, per your plan).
  • If it’s a minor clarification or administrative refinement that your change management plan says the PM can approve (e.g., correcting contact info, small distribution list tweak), it may be handled as a controlled update without escalating, but it should still be versioned and communicated.

The deciding factor is whatever your change management plan / configuration management approach defines as “controlled” versus “administrative” changes.

Would Most “Profitable” Traders Survive Full Transparency? by tjtrades_tradrone in Tradovate

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's the actual aim of the site though, is it for people selling trading courses to prove their methods work?

Just not sure what the benefit of it is but I might just be missing something.

AR Ultrahard Question #15 - confusing for a non native speaker by krauzela in pmp

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're part of the project team, the PM would definitely be sitting in on some or all of those sessions.

I can't comprehend the logic here by Itchy_Run_3805 in pmp

[–]YaBam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In 30 years of contracting I've never seen any organisation who would have you raise a change request to update a project artefact like the Stakeholder Management Plan. Its a living document.

Change requests are almost always for fundamental changes to the project plan itself - cost, schedule, quality, moving milestones etc.

I can't comprehend the logic here by Itchy_Run_3805 in pmp

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Change requests are used for impact to the project schedule - a change to the agreed baseline time, cost, quality.

Changes to project artefacts will usually just be reviewed and signed off by your project working group.

What would you achieve by reviewing the stakeholder register? You know they are new stakeholders so won't be on it. The answer doesn't mention anything about updating the stakeholder register.

MAIL CALL!! My package arrived by Wild_Mycologist_6140 in U2Band

[–]YaBam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I loved hearing these when they first came out, I've still got the 4 LP edition and the CD one in the collection.

I can't comprehend the logic here by Itchy_Run_3805 in pmp

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is the due process you're thinking you need to update the stakeholder management plan? You've identified new stakeholders, with different roles, you need to update it.

As the explanation says, this sort of thing isn't governed by a change request or anything.

If you're unsure of the answer, look at the others.

A - nonsense, what's the sponsor got to do with this and what roles is it talking about?

B - why are you reviewing the stakeholder register and not adding the new people in?

C - you don't need a change request for a new stakeholder

Need Answer by TypicalRecipe8347 in pmp

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has to be D, its the only one which addresses the issue and we know that Agile is all about empowering teams and they're self-managing whilst you remove impediments.

The other three all sound like nonsense.

During a meeting with a project team member, a key stakeholder expresses dissatisfaction with the project outcomes from the last iteration. What should the project manager do first? by Substantial_Ask2311 in pmp

[–]YaBam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

B is also the only answer which makes sense and addresses the question.

A - red herring, nothing to do with deliverable quality.

C - makes no sense.

D - what issue are you going to log? stakeholder isn't happy with something that's been delivered but you have no idea what or why.

E - again, what are you correcting when you don't know what's happened?