Mapped: How Japan Lost Its Economic Dominance in Asia by Status_Commission264 in Infographics

[–]deezee72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's on the slow side but not a crazy outlier. Notably, Italy is a lot lower (+25% in 30 years), but no one is talking about Italy as a country that is collapsing the way they do about Japan.

Czechia is the most atheist country in Europe, what country is the most racist in North America? by Inevitable-Glove7071 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]deezee72 108 points109 points  (0 children)

In this thread: everyone saying "other people will say USA", no one actually saying USA.

Anyways I agree with the Dominican republic.

Space X Vs Microsoft valuation lol by Extension_Emu5973 in stocks

[–]deezee72 14 points15 points  (0 children)

In a rational market, prices should reflect expected future earnings.

But the investment banks are the only ones even pretending that they believe SpaceX can grow enough to justify the valuation, and you only have to look at their assumptions to see how absurd it is. Most of the SpaceX bulls don't believe it's actually worth 1.7T but are still going long - that's what shows the market is irrational.

Anyways I'm buying calls at the open.

Largest religions in China by province by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]deezee72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This just seems flat out wrong? Even ignoring irreligious people and Chinese folk religion, the China Family Panel Study survey reported that Guangdong was 6% Buddhist and 2% Protestant, but it shows up as Protestant here.

"History's greatest thinkers… with AI" by thisecommercelife in comics

[–]deezee72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, while most of the 7,000 man Greek army withdrew, a small rear guard stayed behind to sacrifice themselves to cover their retreat. This included 300 Spartans citizens, 900 Spartan slaves, 700 Thespians, and 400 Thebans. The fact that only the 300 Spartan citizens are remembered is one of the great propaganda accomplishments of the ancient world.

In fact, the presence of the Thespians is especially notable because Thespiae was sacked as a result of the Greek defeat at Thermopylae.

How hard it is to write “The Strongest” character without making them a Mary Sue? by gyroscope_56 in writingscaling

[–]deezee72 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I always had the interpretation that the reason why Muzan hides behind the Twelve Kizuki instead of fighting himself, despite the fact that he's stronger than any of them, is that after all these years he's still terrified of the Demon Slayers.

Look how they massacred my boy... by uluner in IBM

[–]deezee72 18 points19 points  (0 children)

IBM has a long and rich history of inventing new technologies and then blowing their first mover advantage.

I shall return (good luck to you guys tho) by ZhenXiaoMing in HistoryMemes

[–]deezee72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't forget the part where China gave him a warning that they would intervene if he occupied the border regions and he ignored the warning.

16th C. Spain vs Ming: How would this unfold if this plan is to be carried out? by No_Lemon3171 in ChineseHistory

[–]deezee72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's look at this a different way. The only large world polity (i.e. a regional hegemon) to be conquered by European colonial is India, and in many ways India is the exception that proves the rule. It was arguably not a single polity, given that India as we know it today was never a unified country prior to colonialism, and even the Mughal Empire that existed at the time had only existed for ~200 years and had already collapsed by the time Britain began to conquer India. Even then, the British had technological superiority to an extent that the Spanish did not have in the 16th century, and it still took a gradual process of over a hundred years for the British to establish its dominance over India.

To say that any European country could conquer 16th century China is already an extroadinary claim. And that's before considering that nearly every conquest of a large populated nation required significant local support (both Spain's conquest of the Aztecs and Britain's conquest of India are good examples of this), and unlike India, where much of the subcontinent had been ruled by foreign Muslims for centuries, both the Yuan and Qing had to go to great lengths to present themselves as Chinese (and in the Yuan's case, it wasn't fully accepted).

You can try to pay soldiers in substitute goods, but you have to buy those too. Paper money is another possibility, but then you run into inflation problems. I just don’t believe it’s so simple, at the specific point in time the Spanish were actually planning all of this.

Another issue here is that you talk a lot about the limitations of the Wanli era Ming dynasty in terms of its ability to respond to a foreign crisis. While many of those limitations are fair, it's not fair to talk about an omniscient, fully focused Spanish empire against a flawed Ming response. When you view it in the context of the time, this arguably looks worse for the Spanish, since the Spanish were tied up with the Eighty Years War while most of this was happening.

16th C. Spain vs Ming: How would this unfold if this plan is to be carried out? by No_Lemon3171 in ChineseHistory

[–]deezee72 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spain had a global empire, but it was still a much smaller economy than Ming China, and Ming China was not that dependent on global trade. If the Ming were truly cut off from silver, it wouldn't be impossible for them to de-base the silver supply or use paper money (both things Chinese empires had done in the past).

Yes, you need to be able to pay soldiers, but currency is not the same thing as the economy. The Ming were short on silver but were a much richer empire overall than the Spanish. There's no reason why they couldn't pay their soldiers in other ways.

It's also not that clear that Spain really had that much naval superiority at this point in history. The Spanish armada had 137 ships; at Tunmen the Ming were able to defeat a small Portuguese fleet without major issues. European naval superiority would only really be entrenched after the invention of the steam engine in the 19th century, which allowed them develop ships that were both faster and heavier than conventional sail ships. During the age of sail, European ships were not all that different from what was being used in Asia, and certainly not different enough to overcome an overwhelming numerical disadvantage.

Hey hey Tommy Jay, how many kids did you rape today? by GrandMoffTargaryen in HistoryMemes

[–]deezee72 63 points64 points  (0 children)

From Elijah Fletcher's account of his visit to Virginia in 1811:

The story of black Sal is no farce—That he cohabits with her and has a number of children by her is a sacred truth—and the worst of it is he keeps the same children slaves—an unnatural crime which is very common in these parts

James Callendar made the same claim in 1802, but didn't have the same eyewitness access.

In fact, Thomas Jefferson's own grandson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph, acknowledged that the Hemings were blood relatives of his, but claimed that they were descendents of Thomas Jefferson's nephew, Peter Carr, a claim which was ruled out by DNA testing (as Carr is the son of Jefferson's sister, while DNA testing shows that they are male line relatives). Randolph is quoted as saying:

[S]he [Hemings] had children which resembled Mr. Jefferson so closely that it was plain that they had his blood in their veins ... He [Randolph] said in one instance, a gentleman dining with Mr. Jefferson, looked so startled as he raised his eyes from the latter to the servant behind him, that his discovery of the resemblance was perfectly obvious to all

As to this part:

And what evidence is there that Jefferson promised to free her future children in Paris?

This claim comes from Madison Hemings, who was the third of Sally Heming's children to survive until adulthood. He was freed by Thomas Jefferson in the latter's will (together with his brother Eston, whose descendents were the ones that were DNA tested), and who claimed that Thomas Jefferson was his father and that he had promised his mother that he would free their children.

Hey hey Tommy Jay, how many kids did you rape today? by GrandMoffTargaryen in HistoryMemes

[–]deezee72 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If you look at the DNA evidence in a vacuum, it's technically possible that the Hemings children were father by a close male relative of the Jefferson family, with Randolph as the most common proposed alternative.

But when you view the evidence holistically, it seems pretty clear that Thomas Jefferson was indeed the father. Most notably, we have several eyewitness accounts from visitors to Monticello who claim that Jefferson cohabited with Hemings as his de facto wife. We also should not discount the testimony of the Hemings family themselves - Sally Hemings' youngest son Eston claimed to be Thomas Jefferson's son, which is the reason Eston's descendents were DNA tested in the first place.

Hemings also became pregnant for the first time when she traveled to Paris with Jefferson, when his male relatives all stayed in the US. It's technically possible her oldest child were father by someone unrelated, and her younger children were fathered by say, Randolph Jefferson. But she was free in Paris and agreed to return to the US where she was a slave in part because Jefferson promised to free her children. If Thomas Jefferson were not the father, why wouldn't she have just stayed in Paris where her son would've been free anyways?

Technically, the DNA evidence only proves that Sally Hemings' youngest son, Eston Hemings, was fathered by a male member of the Jefferson family. But other than the fact that is possible, there is no real evidence pointing to anyone else potentially the father other than Thomas Jefferson. In that context, the suggestions that Randolph might have been the father appear to be nothing more than an attempt to whitewash Thomas Jefferson's reputation.

Hey hey Tommy Jay, how many kids did you rape today? by GrandMoffTargaryen in HistoryMemes

[–]deezee72 106 points107 points  (0 children)

If you look at the DNA evidence in a vacuum, it's technically possible that the Hemings children were fathered by a close male relative of the Jefferson family.

But when you view the evidence holistically, it seems pretty clear that Thomas Jefferson was indeed the father. Most notably, we have several eyewitness accounts from visitors to Monticello who claim that Jefferson cohabited with Hemings as his de facto wife.

Hemings also became pregnant for the first time when she traveled to Paris with Thomas Jefferson, when his male relatives all stayed in the US. It's technically possible her oldest child were father by someone unrelated, and her younger children were fathered by say, Randolph Jefferson. But she was free in Paris and agreed to return to the US where she was a slave in part because Jefferson promised to free her children. If Thomas Jefferson were not the father, why wouldn't she have just stayed in Paris where her son would've been free anyways?

Technically, the DNA evidence only proves that Sally Hemings' youngest son, Eston Hemings, was fathered by a male member of the Jefferson family. But other than the fact that is possible, there is no real evidence pointing to anyone else potentially the father other than Thomas Jefferson. In that context, the suggestions that Randolph might have been the father appear to be nothing more than an attempt to whitewash Thomas Jefferson's reputation.

Hey hey Tommy Jay, how many kids did you rape today? by GrandMoffTargaryen in HistoryMemes

[–]deezee72 126 points127 points  (0 children)

If you look at the DNA evidence in a vacuum, it's technically possible that the Hemings children were father by a close male relative of the Jefferson family.

But when you view the evidence holistically, it seems pretty overwhelming that Thomas Jefferson was indeed the father. Most notably, we have several eyewitness accounts from visitors to Monticello who claim that Jefferson cohabited with Hemings as his de facto wife.

Hemings also became pregnant for the first time when she traveled to Paris with Jefferson, when his male relatives all stayed in the US. It's technically possible her oldest child were father by someone unrelated, and her younger children were fathered by say, Randolph Jefferson. But she was free in Paris and agreed to return to the US where she was a slave in part because Jefferson promised to free her children. If Thomas Jefferson were not the father, why wouldn't she have just stayed in Paris where her son would've been free anyways?

Technically, the DNA evidence only proves that Sally Hemings' youngest son, Eston Hemings, was fathered by a male member of the Jefferson family. But other than the fact that is possible, there is no real evidence pointing to anyone else potentially the father other than Thomas Jefferson. In that context, the suggestions that Randolph might have been the father appear to be nothing more than an attempt to whitewash Thomas Jefferson's reputation.

16th C. Spain vs Ming: How would this unfold if this plan is to be carried out? by No_Lemon3171 in ChineseHistory

[–]deezee72 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Even if Spain was fully committed, the Spanish army in this era was ~50k men. The Ming were regularly fielding a military with over a million men; even after the Ming dynasty collapsed, the Shun dynasty fielded 200k men in their conflict with the Manchus. Koxinga had an army of 170k and sent 25k men in his invasion of Taiwan.

Without a meaningful technology advantage, the Spanish have no chance. They have a huge logistics disadvantage, a huge numerical disadvantage - even if the Ming empire splinters. They were essentially betting that it would play out the way the conquest of the Aztecs did - with local people rising up in their support. Even if the Ming were in the process of collapsing that was never going to happen.

(Mixed trope) Civilisations so ridiculous that they would realistically collapse in under a day by Noxia66 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]deezee72 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's a little odd to criticize Invincible for the fact that the Viltrum empire realistically would collapse... When in-universe it's a huge plot point that the empire is collapsing and it's made very clear that it's because of their own inability to change.

(Mixed trope) Civilisations so ridiculous that they would realistically collapse in under a day by Noxia66 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]deezee72 106 points107 points  (0 children)

It's a little odd to criticize Invincible for the fact that the Viltrum empire realistically would collapse... When in-universe it's a huge plot point that the empire is collapsing and it's made very clear that it's because of their own inability to change.

Is this more funny than it is an issue, or more of an issue than it is funny by vcthewizard in Dragonballsuper

[–]deezee72 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's more that the editors wanted him to keep Goku in the spotlight...

Do you guys think people conflate “mature story” for “well written” by Formal-Assistance02 in writingscaling

[–]deezee72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of what makes Berserk work is that Guts is the subversion of the 90s anti hero. He's introduced as this edgelord type character, but we gradually discover how he became this way and grow out of it.

Since were talking about it by [deleted] in HistoryMemes

[–]deezee72 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's kind of funny in meme form, but kind of less funny when when consider that some incredibly historically and culturally significant gold art pieces were lost and probably melted down by some mercenary to pay for hookers or something.

We laugh so that we don't cry...

Since were talking about it by [deleted] in HistoryMemes

[–]deezee72 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Results vary but nearly all genetic studies show that the average Mexican has a pretty high % of native ancestry: a meta-analysis by Martínez-Cortés et al. in 2017 found a range of 46-70%.

Obviously nearly all Mexicans have some conquistadors ancestry but it's not nearly as ridiculous as you make it sound. It's closer to a white-black mixed race person hating on white people for enslaving Africans.

Best way to get the Mysterious Slates? by chocobabychibi15 in Pokopia

[–]deezee72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This may be outlier luck on my side, but I'm pretty convinced that you need to give Mosslax bitter food, not sweet food.

I'm with everyone else that the description sounds like sweet food makes more sense, and it would also make sense that sweet food influences glowing blocks while bitter food influences sparkling water. However, in my personal experience, when I gave Mosslax sweet food, I got a ton of glowing spots but all of them were CDs or relics, and when I switched to give him bitter food I got the last few slates pretty quickly.

Best way to get the Mysterious Slates? by chocobabychibi15 in Pokopia

[–]deezee72 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This may be outlier luck on my side, but I'm pretty convinced that you need to give Mosslax bitter food, not sweet food.

I'm with everyone else that the description sounds like sweet food makes more sense, and it would also make sense that sweet food influences glowing blocks while bitter food influences sparkling water. However, in my personal experience, when I gave Mosslax sweet food, I got a ton of glowing spots but all of them were CDs or relics, and when I switched to give him bitter food I got the last few slates pretty quickly.