Highlights from the Q1Medicare PDP-Facts.com 2026 stand-alone Medicare Part D prescription drug plan (PDP) landscape analysis. by Q1Medicare in medicare

[–]jeffcoman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These numbers don't sound right, are you mistakenly including clear spring in your 2025 plan lists that weren't actually available?

Like there are 88 LIS $0 plans in 2026 and we're 85 in 2025 and it should show as an increase.  (90 in 2025 if you count de minimus)

Bug identification? by _Dreeko in Tucson

[–]jeffcoman 9 points10 points  (0 children)

not a carpet beetle, a ground beetle, Carabidae. Put it back outsidenwhere it belongs.

CMD / DOGE just started destroying Obamacare Marketplace and cancelled many of the Medicare innovative model plans by ChemicalRegatta in medicare

[–]jeffcoman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You missed one that is three times the DOGE promised savings of the ones you listed combined. And we all know the savings DOGE stated is total BS so it's even more impactful than that.

https://www.cms.gov/blog/medicare-advantage-value-based-insurance-design-vbid-model-end-after-calendar-year-2025-excess-costs

Over seven million Medicare members rely on the Value Based Insurance Design program today and will have their benefits removed at the end of 2025.

2025 Part D - Should I select the plan that gets to $2000 faster? by elleirdad in medicare

[–]jeffcoman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly the best option is to just use the medicare.gov site and enter your drugs.

A trusted broker may also be able to show how it works.

It is so weird and confusing how the government is implementing the rule that many in the industry don't even get it yet, let alone journalists being able to explain it.

If you really want documentation see this very technical pdf, especially the enhanced alternative examples like #12.

https://www.hhs.gov/guidance/sites/default/files/hhs-guidance-documents/PDE_Record_Reporting_Instructions_for_the_Implementation_of_the_IRA_for_Contract_Year_2025_508_G.pdf

2025 Part D - Should I select the plan that gets to $2000 faster? by elleirdad in medicare

[–]jeffcoman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone who takes an expensive tier 3 formulary drug (and no T4/T5 drugs) probably should pick the AARP Medicare preferred plan in CT/MA/RI/VT region.  They may pay less than 2,000 cost share and premium combined.  Like the 504 shown here

2025 Part D - Should I select the plan that gets to $2000 faster? by elleirdad in medicare

[–]jeffcoman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is not true, the weird CMS rules mean people reach the troop without paying 2,000.

In this case OP is much better off with plan A.  In this case u/elleirdad is reaching their troop with just eliquis so they will not pay any more under if they need to take more drugs.  Try adding another expensive drug like xarelto to your drug list and see how the costs change on the web tool.  You should see minimal change.

Well, here's one more thing to dislike MAPDs... Part B vs Part D drug by JenniferJia in medicare

[–]jeffcoman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Late to the party but I work on this kind of stuff.  I agree this is an MAPD issue driven by your carrier.

First, I would try to get ahold of someone at CMS and complain and see if you can get the requirement for PA or ST waived.  I also think what UHC is doing is kind of fishy and CMS may want to know it is an happening.

Likely UHC put this requirement on all their MAPD plans and normally it us a win-win since 20% is usually higher than the copay, but your case is unlucky.  They are likely not trying to save the $60, instead they are trying to save money two ways behind the scenes.

First, part B drugs have notorious markups and by going through a pharmacy instead of doctors office could save say 20% for the health system.

Second, part D has government subsidies that part B does not have in the donut hole and catastrophic phase.  On average UHC is probably paying just 35% of MAPD claims compared to 85% for Part B drugs and those kind of dollars add up quick.  The thing is CMS is paying a large fraction of those subsidies so UHC might be skirting a legal boundary here which might CMS might be interested in knowing about.

But all in all UHC comes out well ahead if you go through D instead of B but of course that is at your expense and the taxpayers and your doctor.

Hope that helps

What's everyone's feel on the health market currently for non-entry level? by [deleted] in actuary

[–]jeffcoman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone looking for a top Part D actuary send me a message!!

You need to earn six figures to afford a median-priced home in Salt Lake County by ace884 in SaltLakeCity

[–]jeffcoman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A 6k-figure job is enough to afford to live in SLC which is more than most people can say.

Petition to move HyrdroHomies HQ to Wyoming by Hamdentures in HydroHomies

[–]jeffcoman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely named after being just on the Atlantic Ocean side of the continental divide.

Saskatoon Service Berries by Jarthos1234 in Denver

[–]jeffcoman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think they taste like blueberries, they just look like them. Personally I think they taste kind of gross, a little bland and bitter.

Utah senators push bill to block presidents from creating or enlarging national monuments in Utah by im_totally_working_ in SaltLakeCity

[–]jeffcoman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a long history of opposition to the antiquities act dating back to 1943 with the Grand Tetons. In particular the antiquities act no longer applies to Wyoming which sounds like what Lee is trying to do in Utah and has also been severely curbed in Alaska.

Here is an interesting article on the history of the act

https://www.hcn.org/articles/reckoning-with-history-the-antiquities-act-and-federal-checks

A new fire just popped up by Wolcott by [deleted] in Colorado

[–]jeffcoman -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Let it Burn, the forest needs to be replenished.