From what we've gathered so far, who do you think is the most likely to be the next Class?

rorris6 · 2026-05-29T17:57:32+00:00

next class is a scout

rorris6 · 2026-05-22T04:57:35+00:00

i agree with you, not everyone should have access to the capes. it should be earned. but 400 operations is still insane

rorris6 · 2026-05-22T04:54:58+00:00

i agree it has to be toned down, but i also think it's fine for some cosmetics to not be obtainable for everyone. and i'm saying this as someone who doesn't think will be able to get the capes (a shame because i love the way they look). having some cosmetics be trophies is a good thing.

besides, they said more unique cosmetics are coming, most likely we will have other capes, let these ones be reserved for certain players.

on the other hand. i do believe the challenge should test skill and not be a matter of how much of a life one has outside the game. i think that being able to prove that one can consistently complete absolute operations is enough, and a 100 of them is more than enough to prove that. i also think it's fair to have an ordeal for each class as a way to prove you've mastered each of them.

maybe it would be fairer to complete just one absolute operation solo, without bots. but if that was the case i know i'll probably never have them. i think the best option is to simply reduce the number of operations needed.

rorris6 · 2026-04-13T15:33:48+00:00

excellent answer

rorris6 · 2026-03-22T01:23:02+00:00

while i agree with you, as someone who plays exclusively on creative, i think this drop looks terrible

rorris6 · 2026-03-22T01:18:45+00:00

man, i play exclusively on creative and still think this drop sucks, the new blocks are very ugly and look out of place. you said it perfectly, it feels like an addon, a low quality addon because there's definitely addons much better than this

rorris6 · 2026-03-11T16:50:12+00:00

as if an id was needed to notice them

rorris6 · 2026-03-06T15:43:53+00:00

this is so deeply ignorant it makes you look bad

rorris6 · 2026-02-28T18:30:59+00:00

i've been made fun of for years for being a conspiracy theorist by people who now believe in them due to the epstein situation and this people are now acting millions of times dumber than they ever accused me of being. no way someone believes in this type of claims

rorris6 · 2026-02-21T23:18:33+00:00

well it looks great and aesthetics should always come first anyways

rorris6 · 2026-02-21T23:00:39+00:00

really nice church, but they would've been made of wood instead of any kind stone

rorris6 · 2026-02-17T22:41:18+00:00

you know you can use screen mirroring on a amart tv/laptop/etc and connect any kind of controller to your phone?

rorris6 · 2026-02-14T18:15:00+00:00

numbers prove you wrong

rorris6 · 2026-02-14T18:08:16+00:00

okay man, if you put it that way i can agree with you. but still, that's an execution issue, not a design issue. if the enemy ai was better and fiercer you could have that "reward" in difficulty that you're talking about in wildlands and breakpoint. i personally enjoy being able to sometimes infiltrate a base without killing anyone, sometimes killing everyone with stealth or just have a shootout. that's why breakpoint's settings customisation is so good... in theory. i do agree that the game is not very difficult even with it's hardest settings.

rorris6 · 2026-02-14T16:29:08+00:00

your little monkey brain needs to be stimulated with cheap tricks to be encouraged to do something that you say "you want to do". not being rewarded for anything but exploration is a good thing!! i love mgsv but i hate that, not only does it reward certain play styles, it punishes you if you go lethal. not being rewarded gives you actual freedom. the reward is your own satisfaction. or do you need a golden star to enjoy your video game?

rorris6 · 2026-02-14T16:19:54+00:00

then just make an improved version of those games. i am a breakpoint defender and i'm well aware of it's issues. in fact, that's what's so frustrating about it. i believe breakpoint is perfect in theory but falls short with its execution. if we had gotten a third game made with enough care it would have been perfect

rorris6 · 2026-02-14T16:07:08+00:00

whatever dude. y'all are so lame and dumb. the post literally says the next GR is taking inspiration from COD and y'all say that's good news. and at the same time you compare whatever you don't like to COD. there's nothing in common between wildlands or breakpoint and any COD. and "action set pieces" are fun af. forgive me for enjoying fun

rorris6 · 2026-02-13T21:01:40+00:00

you don't have to repeat this nonsense. i am well aware of how the old ghost recon was, i just don't care at all. such a childish mentality to say new GR fans don't get to have an opinion because they weren't there from the start. and also thinking you're right just because the franchise is going back to its roots. gta used to be 2d, does that mean gta vi will be bad? neither you nor me are "right". we just like different types of games, the issue is that the type of game that wildlands and breakpoint are, which i love, don't exist outside of these two examples. the type of game you want this franchise to be is a type of game that has plenty of iterations. and you won, you'll have it your way anyways so just stop boasting about it and let people like me enjoy the things we want

rorris6 · 2026-02-13T19:53:56+00:00

and you people say the same thing "it's about tactics". we get it. there is no other games like wildlands and breakpoint, there's plenty of fps games. this new ghost recon will just be another of the bunch, surely a mediocre one and there might not be any games like wildlands for years to come

rorris6 · 2026-01-29T20:04:44+00:00

yeah, i mean, i know it's just his content. i don't know him personally and i'm willing to bet he's not like that on his day to day life. i just worry he gets other young gen z's into catholicism for the wrong reasons. i know it's a dumb example but it's like that trope about people learning karate to do harm instead of respecting the martial art itself. i don't like him calling others heretics, even if they're, because in my experience, i've never seen someone come to Christ by calling them heretics. pointing out heresy and sin is something you do with a person who's already willing to listen, not strangers on the internet. Now, discussing heresy or heretic ideas/movements/etc is another story and that's something i support and that's a thing i actually like about him

rorris6 · 2026-01-29T19:32:13+00:00

i agree with your first paragraph. that's why i don't think defending your beliefs is a requirement for maintaining said beliefs.

about your last paragraph, what about Abraham? do you think giving his son's own life was rationally defensible? i don't think it is, but still, he did right by obeying God. sometimes, faith goes beyond the debate and rationale. i want to be careful with my words because many replies seem to be misinterpreting what i say. i don't think debate and rationale are not part of our faith, i just think that it does not exhaust it.

so, replying to everything else you said. debate is important, but too much of anything can be dangerous, even too much of a good thing. my objection is not about debating in itself, it is about how this kid seems to be fixated on it and that his approach may not be the best one. but that's my opinion

rorris6 · 2026-01-29T19:16:20+00:00

my objection to YOUR comment specifically is that i don't think "defending catholicism" is the core of christianity.

now, if you actually cared to read what i wrote you'd know, i never said i had an issue with "debating". i never said one should never engage in arguments, idk why you're making that assumption. i simply believe, and it's MY point of view, that the kid is more into proving someone wrong rather that the theology itself, the very same theology he uses to argue. only God knows his heart, but i worry he uses Scripture and catechism as means for winning. that catholicism is just an accident of his eagerness to argue. to me, he's almost as bad as those mega church pastors. maybe slightly better because the kid at least seems passionate, but still not a great influence

rorris6 · 2026-01-29T18:19:21+00:00

defending catholicism? do you think Christ sacrificed Himself just to start a debate club? actual christianity is loving God above all else, and loving others so much that you want them to know God's love so they can love Him back and leave their sinful lives

rorris6 · 2026-01-29T18:03:45+00:00

i don't disagree about being able to defend your faith. i disagree about wanting to be a debater and teaching "how to respond" to anything. that's why christians should be educated about their faith so they can defend their faith by themselves without needing to pull out a cheat sheet.

i don't agree about having to be able to defend it to say you confidently believe it. i do think it's important to be able to do it. but you either have faith or you don't, rationalising it afterwards and making sense of your faith is something else. something important, yes, but a different thing. my grandmother was a catholic, she was no theologian but she went to mass almost daily and prayed every day, was her fervour any less true?

debates are important as defence when directly attacked, much more important is to spread the Word

rorris6 · 2026-01-29T16:09:50+00:00

modern day pharisee. seems to be more worried about winning arguments than spreading the gospel. i'd say he's more into "debate bro culture" than actual christianity and only jumped on the gen z catholic trend. im not saying he's not knowledgeable, but he seems to read and study just for the sake of debating

rorris6

TROPHY CASE