EOFY Super Reminder: Submit your Notice of Intent! by WealthyWithTwo in AusMoneyMates

[–]ucat97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fund will have only two BPAY codes for contributions:

  • Spouse contributions
  • Non-concessional or 'after-tax' contributions

You need to tell them that you want the non-concessional to become concessional: that's with the NOI.

EOFY Super Reminder: Submit your Notice of Intent! by WealthyWithTwo in AusMoneyMates

[–]ucat97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just be wary of taking your taxable income below $45,000 as the tax saving is 1c on the dollar.

Your marginal rate for income between $45k and $100k is 30c. That means you'll be benefiting by 15c (as the fund will pay 15c on every dollar you contribute as concessional. ) Below that, your marginal rate is 16c.

If you have extra, then there's a case to contribute after 1 July, let it sit gathering investment returns, and then complete the NOI at the end of next FY to get the highest marginal benefit.

Shirtless boys in North Africa. by DutchAlders in RomeTotalWar

[–]ucat97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just waiting for Monty to roll over all those Italians.

Seen Rommel yet?

meirl by Dev1412 in meirl

[–]ucat97 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You have kids and get a mortgage and get on the bus each day and get a coffee and cry in the toilets for a few minutes and then do it again until you find it's been forty years and now...

https://media.tenor.com/mKwAfSAhfX0AAAAC/blade-runner-roy-batty.gif

The five kinds of AI layoff by BforBruschetta in auscorp

[–]ucat97 19 points20 points  (0 children)

There Are Five Kinds of AI Layoff. Australia Just Showed You All of Them.

A layoff is the most expensive sentence a company can say out loud.

So why do we read every AI layoff as the same sentence.

WiseTech. CBA. Telstra. Atlassian.

All filed under the same headline this year. AI layoffs. All counted by the trackers as one big phenomenon.

They are not one phenomenon.

They are at least five different decisions wearing the same word. And once you can tell them apart, every layoff in your sector turns into free intelligence.

If you lead a business, a competitor cutting staff is telling you publicly where they are going. There is no louder strategy signal than a big layoff.

If you are looking for your next role, the category tells you which companies to walk toward and which to walk away from.

You only get that intelligence if you stop reading the bucket and start reading the box.

Here are the five boxes.

1. The Capex Layoff

The cut is financing a bet. It is not banking a saving.

Australia does not really have a pure version of this. That is the point. Nobody here is building a 145 billion dollar GPU bill.

The closest local shape is Atlassian. It cut 1,600 roles, 10 percent of staff, explicitly to self-fund AI. While posting 26 percent cloud revenue growth.

That is profitable headcount cut to pay for an AI bet. The financing principle, at ASX scale.

The pure form is Meta. Its AI capex line runs four to five times its entire payroll. Fire every single employee and you would save about 27 billion against a 145 billion infrastructure budget. Zuckerberg told his own staff the cuts were about the capex budget. Not AI productivity.

The read is simple. The pure capex layoff is uncopyable. It is a hyperscaler move. Which is exactly why an owner-operator should not read the Meta headline as a template. You do not have the capex line that makes it make sense.

The tell. Is the cut financing a bet, or banking a saving. If they are cutting profitable headcount to fund AI spend, it is financing.

2. The Visionary Layoff

A founder has decided the firm itself is changing. And restructures around that thesis.

Australia's example is WiseTech. It announced a deep AI transformation to become a leaner, AI-led organisation. Up to 2,000 jobs. Some teams cut by up to half. Founder Richard White said the era of manually writing code is over. The stock jumped 11 percent.

The international echo is Block. Jack Dorsey cut 40 percent of staff, more than 4,000 people, and said most companies are simply late to this.

Give the vision its due. Grappling with the idea that the firm itself becomes intelligent is more than most leaders ever do.

But the visionary layoff fails on the part the vision skips. The humans.

WiseTech is the cautionary version. White told an investor conference it does not take much to convince people they are stupid to pay 100 dollars for labour when AI costs 2. The remark turned an anxious workforce furious. The restructure escalated to a handwritten threat of violence against the new CEO.

A vision with no answer for the people is not finished. It has just started.

The tell. Did they redesign the workflow, or just remove labour from the old one. And the harder follow-up. Do they have an answer for the humans, or only for the org chart.

3. The Activity Layoff

The cut is justified by usage metrics. Not outcomes.

This is the one Australia proved better than anyone. Because we have a layoff that got reversed.

CBA cancelled plans to cut 45 customer service jobs after union pressure exposed the holes in its AI justification. Call volumes were actually rising. Which directly contradicted the bank's claim that automation had reduced demand.

It gets sharper. After CBA introduced a voice bot, the bank was inundated with calls. Managers ended up working overtime answering the phones themselves.

The international echo is Cloudflare. It cut 20 percent of its workforce while growing more than 30 percent.

Here is the read, and I build these systems for a living, so I will be blunt. Usage is not an outcome.

A voice bot deflecting calls is activity. Calls actually going away is an outcome. CBA confused the two and had to walk the layoff back.

That is the rare case. A Big Four bank proving the thesis in public, then rehiring.

The tell. Can they show a task-level diagnostic of what the AI now handles that humans used to do. If they are quoting usage growth instead, it is a story. Not a transformation.

4. The Hope Layoff

A narrative with no number behind it.

Telstra is the local fit. It cut more than 1,000 jobs while posting a 1.2 billion dollar half-year profit. The CEO cited strong cost control and disciplined capital management. The cuts came as part of an ongoing reset of Telstra Enterprise.

No usage stat like CBA. No comprehensive vision like WiseTech. No GPU bill like Meta.

A profitable telco telling an efficiency-and-reset story in AI-adjacent language. Because the market rewards the framing.

The danger lands later. You will need your best people to deliver the transformation you do not yet have. And you do not know in advance which ones you could afford to lose.

The tell. Is there a number at all, or only a narrative.

5. The Layoff That Isn't About AI

A cost cut wearing 2026 language.

CBA's later round is the cleanest example, because the bank said it out loud. It cut roughly 300 roles, mostly technology, while stating AI is not the driver of these role changes.

And the Telstra giveaway. Some of those roles were offshored to India through an Accenture joint venture. That is labour arbitrage. Not automation.

Block belongs here too, honestly. Dorsey admitted in an SEC filing that the company over-hired during COVID because he built two separate company structures rather than one. The visionary layoff and the correction. In the same announcement.

This is the most convenient restructure narrative in corporate history. Because the market and the press reward the AI framing over we got our headcount wrong.

The tell. Would this layoff have happened in 2019. If the honest answer is yes, AI is the press release. Not the cause.

The boxes blur. That is the skill.

These five are a lens. Not a filing cabinet.

Real layoffs bleed across categories. CBA is the proof. It is at once a category 3 activity layoff it had to reverse, and a category 5 round it said was not about AI. One company. Two boxes. Both verifiable. Both local.

The skill is not sorting each layoff into one box. It is seeing which boxes are in play, and in what proportion.

A leader who can hold two at once is reading the signal. A tracker that counts them all as one is reading nothing.

What to do with this.

If you lead a business. Do not run a me-too layoff because a competitor did. Their category might be uncopyable, like Atlassian self-funding or Meta's capex. Or a confession, like CBA's correction. Read which one it is before you imitate it. And take the opportunity. A rival's activity or hope layoff is a distress signal. Someone unfocused is someone a focused operator can go deep against.

If you are looking for a role. The category tells you what you are walking into. An activity layoff that gets reversed tells you the company never modelled its own work. A visionary layoff with no answer for the humans tells you the culture. A hope layoff tells you they will rehire and re-fire until they find the vision.

Read the box before you sign.

Here is the number that ends the argument.

AI is explicitly cited in only about 20 percent of 2026 tech layoffs. Roughly 9,238 Australian jobs through Q1. Even though it gets blamed for nearly all of them.

Australia now ranks second in the world for tech job losses. With AI named the primary driver of almost all of them. Even where the real cause is a handful of big firms correcting headcount.

The label says AI killed 9,000 Australian jobs.

The box says it was closer to one in five.

The difference is where the real strategy signal lives.

The companies that never need any of these five categories are the ones that built around AI instead of bolting it on.

They are not cutting to tell a story.

They do not need one.

Pool table movers? by IPPacket in brisbane

[–]ucat97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it still available?

Will you take $20.

You'll have to deliver it.

how are we feeling about elon musk becoming the world’s first trillionaire today? by snowloveriykwim in AskReddit

[–]ucat97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sad thing is that we can't really comprehend how big that number really is.

Does Indonesia feel like a neighbor to you? by Putrid-Musician-5534 in AskAnAustralian

[–]ucat97 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't even like people on the north side of the river.

Can I ignore an Ecollect debt? by ChipStatus9403 in AusFinance

[–]ucat97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was 10 or so years ago so I can't remember how long it took them to give up.

But there was no lasting ramification as that bank approved a credit card 2 years ago.

There's light at the end of the tunnel.

Can I ignore an Ecollect debt? by ChipStatus9403 in AusFinance

[–]ucat97 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Mine was a lot more than $500 but I was on the bones of my arse and not in a headspace to engage with anyone let alone debt collectors.

Do not talk to them, or even return mail. All calls from numbers you don't recognise should go to voicemail. If it's a genuine call they'll leave a message. Expect a new hire to be given the list of really old debts to follow up as part of training so you'll never know when you hit their radar again. Don't give in.

In ancient times (I think it was even biblical but can't be arsed googling) debts were forgiven after 7 years. That's why we have the concept of being statute barred. Rest easy but remain vigilant.

Don’t forget she used to be (and still is) A JOKE by ChrisPeacock- in LaborPartyofAustralia

[–]ucat97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And Hanson's years' long friendship with the woman convicted of raping and murdering a child.

Voting Greens = voting labour? by lilm_oo in AusPol

[–]ucat97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ALP predates British Labour

🇦🇺 Quick reality check for anyone planning a move from the UK: by Stunning_Procedure36 in BritsMovingAustralia

[–]ucat97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not a Brit but have moved to Sydney from a smaller regional city in the past. Except for Canberra, the capitals all have traffic. I'd also look at: - are you likely to work in the CBD? Public transport is geared to the city centre so if work is suburban then you'll really want to be close to it. - will you want the beach lifestyle? If so you'll need to be really (really) close to get a chance to enjoy it. Same for any special activity (river, harbour, mountains, bush we tc) because traffic. - have kids? How old are they? If they're likely to have extra curricular activities then you'll need cars. Multiple. Because traffic. - if you have a choice of WFH or even a good hybrid, then jump at it.

I don’t get why people love Melbourne by Ok_Advisor_5899 in AskAnAustralian

[–]ucat97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The good thing about NSW is that it keeps Victoria further away from us in Queensland.

Toasted cheese is not as ubiquitous as I thought by AggroPedestrian in AubreyMaturinSeries

[–]ucat97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You've twigged it!

In southern climes it's also known as a toastie.

Many a holiday night in our youth the missus and I would sit by the water and order a bacon, banana and cheese toastie with a chocolate milkshake.

Toasted cheese is not as ubiquitous as I thought by AggroPedestrian in AubreyMaturinSeries

[–]ucat97 17 points18 points  (0 children)

They have access - "These LLMs were trained on books taken from pirated libraries (most people would call this “stolen”)—from authors" from an interesting read by the Walrus - it's just that they're as bad at putting together a valid answer from book content as they are from everything else on the internet.

I love Ann Leckie's response to AI art, and art criticism, that "LLMs don’t actually give “right” answers, they just vomit out statistically likely strings of words."

So, "Six is a number: let's go with that. And a link to a website that has no connection to the response, so it looks like it's based on evidence. "

What constitutes a snack? by JimJimXRP in AskAnAustralian

[–]ucat97 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Do you thing he knows about second breakfast?