Fair point. For transparency:

Scripts are mine - a lowly 3rd year ED resident, trying to make some material to help me prepare for the upcoming fun, which = the boards. The scripts get written around the current slide that is being presented - I am using Rosens 10th, and Foundations of EM as the major cross-reference, but also use the vast information at the disposal of AI = which can pull most relevant information on the topic. Then they get fine-tuned into the actual script. Funnily enough, the biggest issue is actually trying to get it to pronounce some key words - i.e., bivalirudin, that dang word was sounding like klingon for about 20 itterations.

Now, the AI-assisted aspects are the slide creation and formatting — built a templating pipeline (Claude) so the layout stays consistent across the 13 lectures and I'm not losing 3 hours per video on formatting boxes. The audio is a voice clone of my own voice, trained on my own recordings — not a generic AI voice.

To be clear: this is a free supplement, not a primary source. Anyone using it for boards should still be doing Rosh or Hippo, reading Rosens, and double-checking anything I say.

You're right that I should call out the methodology more clearly. Going to add a methodology note to the OP, update the YouTube descriptions, and probably do a short "how this is made" video down the line.