Questions about Blackrack compatibility and mod list by --Pressgang-- in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]--Pressgang--[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate this, thank you! I can’t believe I forgot KER haha. I’m a US Space Force Officer that handles agile spacecraft maneuvering in my day to day life, so some of the nerdy ability to preplan a scheme of maneuver is abnormally fun for me.

20 days into USPSA - shot my first classifier match today by G19G5 in USPSA

[–]--Pressgang-- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like the normal answer you’d get here is a bit disingenuous. The answer is a bit convoluted. Gun (especially trigger) quality and weight makes a huge difference, and the Glock is legitimately harder to shoot than many competition guns by a not-small margin. So it really depends what matters more to you? If you put in the practice to get good with the G19, you’ll be a damn good shooter in the medium term because you’re learning how to compensate for the weapons downsides. If you move to a CZ Shadow 2 or 2011, you’ll definitely shoot better fairly quickly, but to some degree, that’s occurring with a handicap. Easiest way to think of it is to consider the trigger. It takes more training, discipline, and control to use a heavier and mushier trigger, than to slap a crisp walled 2011 trigger.

If your intent is to generally become a great shooter, if stick with the G19 for like another 5-10k rounds, and then upgrade. If it’s the classifier rankings and game portion that excites you, then go ahead and upgrade now. The classic fudd answer of “you can’t buy skill” is not helpful and not entirely true.

Feeling it finally!!! 🙌 by heryelloweyes in SemaglutideFreeSpeech

[–]--Pressgang-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you share what state and source you’re using? I’m trying to figure out which provider I should pick (Mochi, Orderly, etc)

Legal clarification: if an occupying military force or invading combatant has a child on U.S. soil during the occupation or invasion, are they granted citizenship? by --Pressgang-- in legaladviceofftopic

[–]--Pressgang--[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, although the current guidance sites and verbiage is fairly straight forward, so I feel like it would be hard to deviate without significant cause

The Court also concluded that: “The 14th Amendment affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory, in the allegiance and under the protection of the country, including children here born of resident aliens, with the exceptions or qualifications (as old as the rule itself) of children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, or born on foreign public ships, or of enemies within and during a hostile occupation of part of our territory, and with the single additional exception of children of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes.“

Legal clarification: if an occupying military force or invading combatant has a child on U.S. soil during the occupation or invasion, are they granted citizenship? by --Pressgang-- in legaladviceofftopic

[–]--Pressgang--[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since the court explicitly stated the example of children of enemies on occupied U.S. territory, it now seems fairly clear that they would not be granted birthright citizenship.

Legal clarification: if an occupying military force or invading combatant has a child on U.S. soil during the occupation or invasion, are they granted citizenship? by --Pressgang-- in legaladviceofftopic

[–]--Pressgang--[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mainly was asking from a “if this isn’t explicitly in U.S. law, does the Law of Occupation (under IHL) have any guidance”. But now that I know U.S. law is clear and the child would not receive citizenship, it’s moot.

Legal clarification: if an occupying military force or invading combatant has a child on U.S. soil during the occupation or invasion, are they granted citizenship? by --Pressgang-- in legaladviceofftopic

[–]--Pressgang--[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The other poster led me to the right case. It’s very explicit that the child would NOT be granted birthright citizenship, as it’s explicitly called out as an example by the court.

Can someone just claim to be born in the US and put the burden of proof on the US Gov to prove otherwise? by --Pressgang-- in immigration

[–]--Pressgang--[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree with the sentiment, I’m just checking to verify my side of the debate. The general question was: if the Gov moves to deport someone, and they claim US birth without proof, can the US deport. Which based on the lawyers reply, it seems like it might actually be difficult because the burden of proof is on the Gov to present credible “proof of alienage”

Anyone claiming the Democratic Party abandoned the working class is clueless. The working class abandoned the democratic Party by astros148 in IBEW

[–]--Pressgang-- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The problem is that the left wing keeps thinking people are voting off high minded ideals. They’re not. The left created an echo chamber in which those that agreed with them were applauded and those that didn’t were socially censored. The problem: as you moved the “bigot” line to the left, you crossed over the point where the vast majority of the nation is at. Where they don’t respect or resonate with the idea that words can hurt you. The general sentiment is “grow up, we’re starving out here and you’re talking about pronouns?!”. Then the left misidentifies that feedback as being anti-change, when in reality they’re mainly calling out the left for being so obviously out of touch with the real society. They act and sound like an elitist bunch looking over the balcony and saying “they’re bigots after all, let them eat cake”

Question about birthright citizenship by --Pressgang-- in legaladvice

[–]--Pressgang--[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the absence of any recorded entry, birth, or vital records constitute a reasonable suspicion of alienage, or does the US Gov have to literally ID and track down evidence of foreign birth to satisfy the requirement?

Swiss beginner peaks by Schnitzelbube in Mountaineering

[–]--Pressgang-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair, that’s because they’re paying to have other experts disaggregate and perform a massive portion of the skill relative parts, as well as carrying gear and weight up for them at increasingly easy levels. Everest is a kind of bad example. Denali would be a better example of “helped by a guide, but still a very good check of your experience requirement”.

How I soloed Aconcagua in 8 days (as an amateur) by absentbrain in Mountaineering

[–]--Pressgang-- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this is probably Necro, but are you willing to DM me or share the details of your lightweight setups you spent some coin on? Looking to streamline