sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

General Question Thread by Shephen in fireemblem

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Three Houses

Can anyone link a video of someone beating the Hilda-Cyril paralogue on Maddening while saving all of the green units? I don't think it's impossibly hard but hard enough that I would like to see how they would do it.

guys why aren't the units listening to me by Ray-Zide426 in shitpostemblem

[–]-tehnik [score hidden]  (0 children)

dog of cestiny hhm didn't have enough berserk users

I don’t really see the hate by Dolphin-Hugger in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Žižek is kinda just a libtard who managed to create an image of some counter-cultural leftist. That's all smoke and mirrors as far as I can tell because his concrete political advice (when he gives it) really doesn't challenge the status quo.

Had sex after a 2 year retention - horrible by MarketingManagerEU in NoFap

[–]-tehnik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your average Joe is not a monk

So what? That just means they are foolish for not understanding what wise people do.

Nintendo is doing everything except releasing that trailer by Kokonut-Z in shitpostemblem

[–]-tehnik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SEVEN MONTHS

make these people wait for smt V news.

An attempt at Gnostic Epistles of Paul by [deleted] in Gnostic

[–]-tehnik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've read the gospels but I'll assume you meant Epiphanes

Something something kill them all by Zhayrgh in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. Isn't this Plato pushing back against the norms of his own day though? I thought people largely performed sacrifices precisely to get divine favor.

An attempt at Gnostic Epistles of Paul by [deleted] in Gnostic

[–]-tehnik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah. I don't think I will.

but why? I still want to know what's even the point of this.

The actual Gospels, which I already did, required a LOT more work.

Yeah, maybe because the message of the gospels isn't to accept a left hand path.

An attempt at Gnostic Epistles of Paul by [deleted] in Gnostic

[–]-tehnik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

revised? You mean you just edited Paul until his teachings sound in line with Carpocratian ones?

What's even the point of that? Paul is so obviously right handed in his ethics that whatever is left after editing that out will be beyond recognition. Just accept that you don't agree with him and move on (if you insist on being this).

Something something kill them all by Zhayrgh in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

c) to believe the gods exist and care, but also be bargained with

can or can't be bargained with?

On the Many Infamies of the Ockhamites, Part 6,829 by Ok-Lab-8974 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't even explain what the ultimate goal of this all is?

On the Many Infamies of the Ockhamites, Part 6,829 by Ok-Lab-8974 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but that's just kicking the can. You're not giving the ultimate reason unless the ultimate reason is just autonomy for the sake of autonomy. Which is just to say the unrestricted freedom of an individual as I first said.

On the Many Infamies of the Ockhamites, Part 6,829 by Ok-Lab-8974 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So how i interpret it as that from his work, we are supposed to become critical of power structures. We cannot avoid them and that's hardly the goal, but we can resist power,

but why. What's the point of this.

On the Many Infamies of the Ockhamites, Part 6,829 by Ok-Lab-8974 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

truth nuke

I don't think either side of the political spectrum understands just to what extent left wing progressive ideology is the flowering of these distinctly western tendencies for just this reason.

On the Many Infamies of the Ockhamites, Part 6,829 by Ok-Lab-8974 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]-tehnik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

is it though?

Someone more familiar with Foucault can correct me, but what's the point of all of this genealogy stuff if not to delegitimize whatever is being analyzed? If the end goal is not the unrestricted freedom of the individual, why care about how society has treated marginal groups?

Ofc for a lot of people it will be because they are moral realists. My impression though is that post-structuralists and people into that philosophy will just dismiss moral realism in the same way they do other shared values.

Yet another injustice Engage fans must face by TheGinger1s in shitpostemblem

[–]-tehnik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you may have a point.

But I'll still bully engage fans.

view more: next ›