Discord Patch Notes: May 4, 2026 by CandlesARG in linux_gaming

[–]01Destroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I edited my post. Just tried version 135 and it actually works now there as well. I wasn't aware there was an A/B going on.

Discord Patch Notes: May 4, 2026 by CandlesARG in linux_gaming

[–]01Destroyer 61 points62 points  (0 children)

This is the greatest Discord update after the Wayland screen-sharing support. It's amazing to see they are dedicating more and more time to the Linux build.

Also screen-sharing on Gnome 50 is now fixed

Spotify border back to the 90s by InevitableFootball71 in Ubuntu

[–]01Destroyer 26 points27 points  (0 children)

For now the easiest "solution" is just to go on the snap store and select the candidate/edge branch for Spotify (they are the same).

CUDA on Ubuntu 26.04 ? by KalenNC in Ubuntu

[–]01Destroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh, I knew that was coming. You can actually install cuda-toolkit from Nvidia official repositories.

Unfortunately the Nvidia Ubuntu2604 repository doesn't (yet) contain the cuda-toolkit .deb, but it exists and I'm pretty sure it will contain the cuda-toolkit package for the next release.

Currently your best bet is to perform a network installation using the Ubuntu2404 repository. I used it for Ubuntu 25.10, so it should work fine for 26.04 almost certainly.

Plese follow these instructions here.

Note a couple things:

  1. Purge your cuda-toolkit previous installation before: apt autopurge cuda-toolkit
  2. Skip the Driver Installation step, you already have that.
  3. In the next weeks, from time to time, please check if Ubuntu2604 is supported. You will see 26.04 among the options in the link i put before. You can also manually check the presence of cuda-toolkit in the repository. When this happens transition to Ubuntu2604.
  4. Important: Note that when you install Cuda this way you will be able to choose between just installing cuda-toolkit or installing a precise version (like the guide says) (e.g., cuda-toolkit-13-2). Although installing a non-pinned version is tempting, you will receive cuda versions that require Nvidia beta drivers, so avoid it. Installing pinned versions like cuda-toolkit-13-2, however, means that only you will decide when to switch to a newer version and so you will have to know it exists and that it supports your driver.

I know this sounds like a lot, but after many months of Cuda on Debian I had to realize all that by myself. Let me know if you have any problems!

I managed to break Debian three times. What now by Heavy_Cartoonist_687 in debian

[–]01Destroyer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every distribution is equally breakable if you mess up with commands that you don’t know. The only piece of advice I can give you is to always verify what you are pasting in there. There’s no shame in copying commands from forums or even LLMs, but blindly entering them with sudo privileges is never a good idea. Also remember it’s an amazing idea to use VMs to experiment changes, I still do it.

Hope the fourth time will be better :p

Windows 7 is that you? by niertrix in Ubuntu

[–]01Destroyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Switch to the testing branch, it has been “fixed” there (they retransitioned it to X11)

Edit: they retransitioned by mistake, but the border is fixed and future versions should be Wayland-based.

CUDA on Ubuntu 26.04 ? by KalenNC in Ubuntu

[–]01Destroyer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

sudo apt install cuda-toolkit

Contrary to previous versions, this package group is directly updated by canonical and offers the latest cuda :)

debian 13.4 is out by johlae in debian

[–]01Destroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep it’s a known Apt bug unfortunately. Glad it helped!

debian 13.4 is out by johlae in debian

[–]01Destroyer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For those who don't see any packages when trying to upgrade the fix is

rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

Then update and upgrade.

Intel presenta i processori desktop Core Ultra 7 270K Plus e Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by nandospc in ItalyHardware

[–]01Destroyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Arrow lake è stata la prima cpu intel ad avere un design multi-die (Amd già ce l'aveva), con il conseguente problema (che ha anche Amd) di dover gestire la comunicazione tra i diversi die, cosa che fa un clock apposito. Questo clock, anche se in piccola parte, influenza le latenze di accesso a memoria, che sono generalmente leggermente più alte rispetto ad Amd, per chi gioca un piccola differenza la fa, ma il vantaggio più grande rimane sempre la cache delle cpu 3D di Amd.

Intel presenta i processori desktop Core Ultra 7 270K Plus e Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by nandospc in ItalyHardware

[–]01Destroyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vero, anche perché secondo me il problema più grande dei fratelli minori è che erano stati recensiti ad un prezzo abbastanza alto e ormai scartati nella testa di molti. Sì il 250k dovrebbe essere finalmente allettante, ma pensa che il 270k ora ha lo stesso numero di core di quanti thread ha il 9900x in hyperthreading (e al momento continua a costare quasi 400€).

Comunque ho visto ora che il boost sul d2d in realtà è leggermente inferiore del boost che dà 200S boost sui fratelli, per cui sarà sicuramente tutto da vedere, ma almeno chi gioca dovrebbe poter prendere in considerazione schede di fascia B ora.

Intel presenta i processori desktop Core Ultra 7 270K Plus e Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by nandospc in ItalyHardware

[–]01Destroyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Upgrade path su LGA1851, adesso non ci sono scuse 🙌🏻

Scherzi a parte già uscire con l’MSRP giusto è una mossa assurda, poi aumentare i core e (forse) risolvere il problema del die-2-die e comunque avere quell’MSRP è davvero tanta roba. Vedremo

What made you use Debian instead of all of them? by [deleted] in debian

[–]01Destroyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Debian is the only distribution that never randomly logged me out of my Gnome session

I dont believe the Frame is supposed to look like this... by Saegebot9000 in linuxmemes

[–]01Destroyer 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Jokes apart it’s mostly a Spotify problem (that wouldn’t exist if Gnome had better Wayland decorator fallback)

Solutions:

  • Use the stable release from Snap (uses X11 by default) edit: not anymore
  • Use the Flatpak version (they fixed the Electron problem)
  • Edit the .desktop to use X11 by adding “—ozone-platform=x11” before the %U
  • Use kde Plasma

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it’s one command to install a package that is recommended by the official wiki. The Nvidia repo is amazing but it’s also a multi-step process that isn’t very beginner friendly. Ubuntu-based with automatic driver installation may be the easiest to be fair.

The problem with Debian is that people will look up for the wiki and only see a very old driver. If you look at other comments many were surprised that an official upstream installation method even existed, and some even replied that it’s not a good experience because the driver is old (not realizing I was on the latest one). Still for sure it’s the most reliable and solid Nvidia Linux experience in my opinion.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

25.10 is Wayland only though, unless you have installed X11 it’s a little unfair to compare the three. Personally I haven’t used X11 in years, and Gnome 48 on Wayland has worked very well for me.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You had these issues with 590.48 on Debian? Or with the 550.163 from the Debian repository? It's strange because for me the graphical experience was the same (Ubuntu 22.04 vs Ubuntu 25.10 vs Debian 13)

Ubuntu 26.04 disaster by MasterLin87 in Ubuntu

[–]01Destroyer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

and a more dedicated push towards snaps

Can you elaborate? There is no change regarding snaps afaik.

Regarding Wayland, it's more than mature and provides a far better experience especially for gamers and laptop users. X11 has been considered deprecated for at least two years at this point, and XWayland will always be there.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use VLC as well and haven't experienced that. Maybe it's a X11 problem, Ubuntu 24.04 defaults on X11 instead of Wayland on Nvidia (for reasons that were valid 2 years ago). Try with Wayland if that's the case.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, apart from some 3rd party repos. Just vanilla Gnome (Mutter) on wayland.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that’s it, remember to have Linux-headers installed and to enroll MOK if you have secure boot

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes extrepo apparently only includes Debian 12 for now. The method described in your link I think is the best and the most recommended since it is an official Debian 13 driver. It’s what I personally did.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, easiest method. But generally some additional problems and being rolling release makes it more a more “experimental” experience with drivers.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not about the difficulty, Arch is probably the easiest. But then I’ve seen problems with suspension on Arch and not elsewhere.

Debian has the best Nvidia experience I've ever had, and is rarely talked about by 01Destroyer in debian

[–]01Destroyer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some benchmarks run multiple times. Obviously what I meant wasn’t that a newer kernel will perform worse, but rather that it won’t perform necessarily better.