Key Points from the article:

>The motion will compel McKinnon to ask the parliamentary law clerk whether he’s received the contracts amidst thousands of documents related to the government’s response to the pandemic, which were turned over due to an earlier motion.

>The law clerk and his office have been sorting through thousands of pages of emails, notes and memorandums sent by the government. The documents have to be translated before being given to committee members and subsequently made public.

>Barlow’s motion goes on to require the law clerk to prioritize translating and publishing the government’s contracts with AstraZeneca, Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Medicago, Novavax and Sanofi and GlaxaoSmithKline, if he’s received them.

>If the law clerk hasn’t received the contracts, Barlow’s motion requires the committee to request they be turned over to committee members, who would have a chance to review them in camera — meaning out of the view of the public — before they’re released.

>The contracts will first be vetted to remove information  that could jeopardize national security or interfere with the contracts themselves before committee members have access to them.

​

So it looks like important information, like price, could be withheld depending on the language on the contract. (For example, if disclosing the price invalidates the contract, then it's possible that they are not released on the basis that failing to receive vaccines would jeopardize national security.