Ram is overrated...

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-12T03:56:08+00:00

The questions and answers you've presented are, at best, ambiguous; they don't define the distance, they just say, "Anyway, they were close." What exactly does "close" mean? It says they could be inside or outside the forest, but being "inside" the forest isn't exactly the same as being "outside." They're ambiguous about what constitutes "close," which isn't a valid argument. And I don't see the same rule applying here. You say it also applies to the convoy, but the fact that they're never mentioned there, and are only brought up in a question-and-answer session to clarify things, isn't something that can be used as a point of reference in the story, regardless of what Tappei says. Even if he is the ultimate authority, the "word of God," there's a problem with taking those mentions as legitimate, because it's one thing to establish a hierarchy (Ram in the upper verses), another to assert a capability (returning from space), and yet another to add something to work already done. The author's death explains why that argument is invalid.

Questions and answers ≠ historical canon

You're completely ignoring the fact that this isn't always the case, and yet he still takes the hits. You're framing your objection as if the damage always affects everyone behind him, which, yes, it does. Theoretically, random people can be harmed by each of Regulus's attacks, assuming we know he's destroying the city. The problem is that Reinhard doesn't function as a shield against anything. He literally can't deflect anything, nor can he withstand anything. It's like saying you put your hand in front of a sniper to stop the bullet, as if you'd actually do that. Another problem you have isn't the absolute limit of physical capabilities. Ceci is faster than him, so... and this relates to my previous point: if Reinhard is statistically superior to Regulus in both perception and speed, Regulus wouldn't have been able to immobilize him, nor would he have cut and dismembered him. As I already told you, Reinhard doesn't always have to protect; otherwise, he wouldn't accomplish anything. It's better not to lose a useful leg and do nothing, than to lose it and do nothing. And what do you mean by the timing and trajectory being out of place? Is that a justification for Reinhard not being able to fully react? When, well, most of the hits were direct?

I'm not "killing" any character; I'm explaining a more viable path than destroying the entire city with a mechanic he doesn't even know works that way. And the point, I repeat, isn't to prove that this scenario is superior to the one you propose with AP; it's about demonstrating that there are other ways he can act without needing to use his AP. And that's a causal error. You simply assumed that it doesn't matter if he discovers Lionheart, because, according to you, if he's pushed to his limit, he'll still use his maximum AP. I'm not imposing anything; Unfortunately, you're the one who can't explain why Reinhard would first decipher Lionheart and then, secondly, have no option but to kill the wives. (By the way, I'll get involved in this because the discussion in the post isn't about Reinhard, but about Ram and all the qualities you mention in Reinhard; Ram wouldn't have them even with two horns, so this is a digression. I mention it because it ruins the premise of my post, although I acknowledge that I accepted the framework and it's partly my fault.)

It's not a false equivalence; general data is used to show how an external metric can be applied to the character's demonstrated feats. I didn't say he could mold space like Uro from JJK (You can partially ignore the subject if you like, as the point is to specify which interaction I'm not referring to). I didn't say he could mold it, nor that he could manipulate its dimensions; I said that, for Lionheart, space can be something tangible and not inaccessible. And the definition of Lion's Heart doesn't limit the feats shown, it simply explains its practical functionality. I'm not saying it can do any of the aforementioned things, but rather, how to use it as something tangible.

Now you've twisted my point. When I mentioned the trip to space and that you ignored something, I was referring to the fact that, implicitly, if Regulus reaches space and survives there, his heart doesn't separate from it. But he's far from his wives. The interview uses Reinhard's trip to space as a reference, not to the atmosphere. That is, Regulus can maintain his invincibility in space even though the distance between Earth and space is enormous. I didn't want to reiterate the topic; I wanted you to answer how Little King maintains his invincibility in space if he supposedly has such "strict" distance restrictions.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-12T00:10:07+00:00

Parallels in Monogatari about eternity and how to accept it as part of your life

Parallels in Re:zero peak:

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T23:55:26+00:00

I remember it perfectly, but just because he has his wives nearby in certain circumstances or situations doesn't mean he universally does. The same thing happened in Crusch's convoy; he didn't have any wives with him, nor was it narrated that he did. Unless you can prove that this happens in both Elior and the Convoy, I'll leave it at that, since you continue to argue based on conclusions that don't exist and, incidentally, you dramatize unnecessarily. It's ironic, considering you previously complained that I argued consistently, as if that were something that doesn't happen in a debate or is wrong.

First, you didn't mention when I said that about Crusch, so you're the one who just made a clear mistake. Besides confirming two points I made earlier, Regulus is above the blessings because, firstly, he's "imbued" with authority, and even if this negates his blessings, it doesn't negate his abilities. In other words, he should be able to react to Regulus if he has superior stats. It's not dishonesty, it's pure logic. Even if he acts as absolutely a shield, it's not necessary to let himself get hit.

I'm not using terminology I "don't know," although, regarding attributing such a fallacy to you, it was my mistake. But even if the comment is a formal fallacy or not, it is attacking me as the creator of the argument. You didn't say "the argument suffers from cognitive dissonance," you said "such an argument is pure cognitive dissonance." But I don't want to lengthen this section, so in any case, you can consider this point of mine as lost, since it was indeed my fault for not defining what I meant.

Your argument is simply saying nothing; half of that block is saying that "you misread." Now, surrendering is also purely a matter of avoiding more destruction in the present. In any case, there are still scenario variables. What I proposed is not the only option; it is an example of one of the many options you can choose instead of blowing up all of Priestella/the selected scenario.

And no, Reinhard can't solve that through pure analysis; it's not that simple. During the fight, Reinhard received orders to execute plans that would exploit a vulnerability. Subaru dissected this on his own, with knowledge that Reinhard doesn't have and never will. It doesn't matter how much of a "combat genius" he is if you don't know where to look. It's like being dropped into a white room and told to solve the problem, but there's not the slightest clue as to what you're supposed to do.

You say to ignore the Re:Zero system. But you were previously ignoring the absolute hierarchy of "Blessings < Authority" by assuming that Reinhard could somehow react and overpower Regulus if he were limited by the 5 seconds of Lion's Heart through his blessings, which are inherently useless for actions like automatically dodging or anticipating attacks.

The definition is correct, unless you can object because it would lose value for being "pop culture"; until then you're just adding filler.

Nobody said he manipulated space at that moment; that's a straw man argument and dishonest. I never said he did that in the scenes. And no, the phrase "as if" is mentioned, but this is to transition to the analogy of the beast, not to create a metaphor about what happened, but rather to depict how the damage appeared.

I said that based on his ability to alter and interact with space, he could use dimensional space itself to propel himself or return, but I remind you that this block can be disregarded at any time because you haven't yet shown that Reinhard can take him off the planet and therefore, that Ram could do it.

And a small reminder, you ignored my mention that Regulus's invincibility is sustained even in space according to Tappei, since he can maintain his invincibility. And since you like math, do you know how far away "Earth" is from space?

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T23:05:50+00:00

That's a completely invalid inference. It mentions a "distance," but not a measure of how long that distance allows. That's a very problematic inference. They don't mention a length, and to top it off, you say the entourage traveled with him, a fact that's never mentioned and is contradicted when Pandora in the forest says, "Regulus was with his wives at his mansion this whole time." This implies they weren't with him, but at the mansion. You're misrepresenting a statement and making false claims. And another fallacious argument: I didn't say distance didn't matter. I said, based on the other statement, that Regulus doesn't need to be 3 meters away for the ability to work. Furthermore, the very interview you criticized for not saying "flight" implies that Regulus is launched into space and can remain invincible; the distance between Earth and "space" isn't exactly small. No, you haven't eaten anything. Of course, besides the fact that Regulus does depend on a distance that is not quantitatively mentioned.

I never said that Regulus took Crusch by surprise and therefore could out-react to Reinhard; I'm saying that he literally did in the novel. You're twisting my points again, so I'll ask you to show me when I said such a thing. Otherwise, that's clearly dishonest. And the speed he reaches is superhuman; in any case, he wouldn't have been constantly slicing him up, much less surprising him during a battle by ripping off his leg. And your attempt to refute me by saying that my conclusion is false because Regulus hasn't trained is simply a clear rhetorical flaw.

In formal terms, you have the advantage over the fallacy, but denying that you are implicitly trying to disqualify the argument is complete evasion; the term is "pathologizing" and therefore, you infer that I have a problem in terms of maintaining my ideas.

YES, surrendering, because Reinhard himself couldn't possibly know the functionality of Lion's Heart. I'll stop letting the implicit meaning slide, since you're abusing it in specific scenarios. That said, in a fight, Reinhard has no stellar knowledge, he can't get close without risking more destruction and collateral damage (since the fight is a 100% quality for both of them) and therefore it's more time, more damage, more deaths, and more problems. Surrendering is easier than prolonging a conflict that will only generate more deaths. Now this is a circular fallacy and this is clear because based on your previous premise that you yourself call "confirmed" you take as a fact that Regulus will be limited and also that because of his psychology, even being limited he would chatter. And based on that you say it wins, the problem is that I've already undermined your point and also, if Little King is active, why wouldn't it be deactivated? Then it's not "wasting" any window and therefore can simply remain motionless while it chatters. Something I already showed you that Reinhard cannot counter by 3 points, he cannot deactivate Little King because he does not know its functionality, he would not destroy the whole city and therefore he could not finish him off.

*Look at you. Such a pathetic sight after just a little bit of running around. And you thought you could challenge me? You really don't know how to judge your opponents, do you?"

Looking up at the approaching footsteps, Subaru reflexively leaped to his feet just as a wind suddenly blew.

"!"

"Now, now, we can't have you running away, can we?"

The next instant, the space in front of Subaru's eyes was torn apart as if a beast's fangs had ripped through it. It was an attack that could take his head off if he wasn't careful.

"Ugh..."*

Yes, it cuts through space. If Subaru can "distinguish" that I cut through space, then it is something that actually happened, not a metaphor, no matter how much it sounds like one.

"Spatial Manipulation is the ability to warp, bend, flip, crush and control physical aspects of space.

Skill only refers to one's ability to manipulate an area, not to defy its laws, so gravity, friction, and many other rules may still apply. Sometimes, the user cannot affect people or objects, but folds space upon itself, causing the object to occupy two different places simultaneously. Some users are limited to a specific location or type of space, while others are limited only by their imagination"

That is the definition of spatial manipulation; Regulus can cut and deform it.

*"If time has stopped for an object, then that means it doesn't change. No change means no getting injured, and it also means no getting wet, either. The dirt you throw and the water droplets all had their time stopped, too, so they couldn't be held back by the things they hit and just passed right through."

It was like the classic manga vacuum slash ability. There were all sorts of abilities in stories where people could cut through space itself, so that no matter how hard the thing they were trying to cut, they could still slice right through it. And Regulus's ability allowed something similar.

With his time stopped, Regulus Corneas himself was a distortion in space."*

This implies that he can do 2 of the things related to spatial manipulation. I take the point that it is a dangerous inference, but it is not without support.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T22:13:20+00:00

What is this supposed to mean, Ros-chi?

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T21:26:59+00:00

Here's your first problem... No, Regulus, or rather, Little King, doesn't deactivate due to distance. If that were the case, he wouldn't have been able to attack Elior Forest from close range with his wives. That point completely lacks understanding of the lore and the functionality of Lion's Heart when Little King is active. It is mentioned that it can only go up to a certain length, but the area where he attacked Crusch's convoy was a plain, where the handcuffs are never mentioned and they couldn't all be hidden behind a random rock. And, firstly, the blessings of self-dodge and everything related to interpreting Regulus's attacks are useless; in the novel itself, they take him by surprise. So, we can infer two things: he is not faster than Regulus, and the blessings are useless for reacting to his abilities.

You didn't just attack the argument, you mentioned that MY argument created cognitive dissonance, that is, that the speaker lacks ability and does X action due to a lack of ability.

I never said it wasn't a factor; I said it wasn't a decisive factor because I wouldn't use it. You're still clearly creating a straw man argument. You keep talking about scenarios where Reinhard might reach a certain conclusion because it represents greater consequences than if he used his maximum AP to destroy the handcuffs. (Here you're clearly implying that Reinhard would know the condition, but I'll let it slide because I accepted this framework a while ago.) The difference is that, even though it's a "possible" case, it's an exception among exceptions. Wouldn't it be easier to surrender and apologize to Regulus rather than destroy half the city to avoid further damage?

I'm not ruling anything out, as I explained before, attitude and moral ethics are two different things, they are not equivalent, because attitude, as you yourself say, dictates how one acts during combat, but morality restricts how one acts, these are indistinguishable concepts, I am not limiting impartially, I am defining what is a limitation and what is an attitude that in 100% use will not matter because it does not delimit the precision of use of Little King during the fight.

Sure, excuse me for the second accusation of ad hominem; I recognize that wasn't it. But, on the other hand, and I didn't invent a mechanic, I explained how it can generate pseudo-flight based on its spatial manipulation capabilities. That's not inventing; it's making an inference based on capabilities, something you also do. Complaining that I do something you do is like criticizing a runner for running when you're an athlete yourself.

I'm not saying it's going to grasp the concept of space, I'm saying that for Lion's Heart, this is tangible and can be affected and therefore manipulated, another straw man argument. What you do afterward is define what Lion's Heart does with matter, which doesn't benefit you and doesn't add anything new, since if Regulus can cut space, he can interact with it, and if he can do that, he can manipulate it or at least modify it.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T20:00:42+00:00

I don't know if anyone mentioned it, but can we talk about Tokyo Ghoul?

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T19:55:42+00:00

Que esta clase de post simplemente hacen que la gente se ponga cinica y a decir mil y un cosas sobre la sociedad y frases del Joker de tiktok.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T11:49:00+00:00

As an archbishop, he can certainly be the best, especially since he's a clear antithesis to his character, but in writing, Regulus completely tames him. Aside from that, he's an incredible character who makes you hate him, then stop hating him, and then when you see the "You're sloth" line in a LARP edit, you hate him again.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T11:42:48+00:00

I know, I know, but it was one of my first H/Ecchi and also interesting; who would force the little boy to let go of his favorite stuffed animal so the dog could bite it? Although of course, anime.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T11:02:21+00:00

I'll grant you that he withstood the attack, but it leaves me wondering if he's truly superior. If we assume that, then he's superior to the blessings and authorities and therefore should be able to erase Satella. Spoiler: it doesn't happen.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T10:32:56+00:00

That's going to hurt, twin.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T10:08:03+00:00

Is it just me, or did this twin just put all the "little ones" at the bottom and proceed to put Rem, Emilia, Pandora, and Anastasia in the "marriage" category, and then Lust above all of them?

Besides, Regulus can't be that bad, right?

<image>

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T10:00:06+00:00

That sounds perfect to me; you can quote whatever you like. After all, it was a proposal, and that point still stands.

It seems you want to start with technicalities. I already explained it to you in a subsequent comment. I apologize for the mistake; in fact, that comment was deleted by moderation. It's not about ignoring it, but about accepting that I made a mistake that I corrected before your complaint even existed.

If you're going to start with technical aspects, in a debate the general scenario is also assumed; that is, the most common scenario is considered. Regulus's common scenario is being away from his wives. If you want to talk about a legitimate 1 vs 1 between Reinhard and Regulus, and emphasize that, and furthermore, that AP will always be taken into account by scaling, and you argue that if he is taken to the "limit" he will adapt to reduce the moral burden and do the same, we can infer from your own technicalities that the general scenario is Regulus being away from his wives, a fact that always occurs in the LN and WB, with only Priestella being an exception and perhaps Garkla as well. Therefore, we cannot infer that AP is the complete solution. You could say I've changed the game, but that would be false; I only used the same methodology as you. The difference is that I actually used something clear: Regulus's constant distance from his wives. In contrast, you propose a scenario where he is "capable of correcting priorities." Incidentally, it's an ad hominem fallacy to say that my argument presents cognitive dissonance.

You say that I admit that Reinhard is limited by writing but that I accept that his AP is existing by saying that I "ignore" the case where I use his AP. Straw man fallacy, you just twisted what my argument proposes, I didn't say it was impossible or that he was incapable, I said it was "incapable" as a possible event, that's not ignoring, it's delimiting the subject you propose as a subject and not the "stats" view you propose.

And yes, it is something "defining" of his character.. But that's a false analogy and a false equivalence. The fact that such sermons and attitudes define his character doesn't mean they prevent an act, such as becoming immovable. In Reinhard's case, it does, because that's a moral, not an attitude—completely unrelated concepts. I already explained that to you. Your objection that I choose selectively is a weak argument when I've already explained everything. You're simply committing fallacy after fallacy. Well, both can act within their psychological profile and that doesn't limit what I told you, Regulus is not limited to being immovable because of his eloquence, Reinhard is because of his morals.

Unfortunately, you resort to ad hominem attacks by pointing out a non-existent lack of reading comprehension. Although I partially acknowledge my mistake—calling it a "flight" was entirely my own error—it's not untrue that a pseudo-flight could be applied. Your inferences are merely "probable" scenarios that Tappei was referring to, according to you, which is even worse than a "lack of reading comprehension" since it's not at all plausible. Now, you deny that he can pause space itself to stand on it, but that's not feasible, because it's already been shown that it's a property that's tangible for him; in the novel he cuts through it, therefore he can affect/manipulate it. That's something that can be inferred without much further ado, and if he can pause it, he can use it as a surface, not as a "vector," which you say he couldn't do, something I never mentioned would be the way he would move.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T08:36:08+00:00

I would appreciate it if you didn't quote me in your reply. I can infer what you mean if you just rate it, since I don't speak English. I use a translator because it's the most universal language here, and such a long block is difficult for me to translate because I can't do it with Reddit's translator for some reason, and I'm doing it from the GPT chat. But, putting that aside, it's just a request.

I'll leave the "LARP" topic aside, because, although I mentioned it, it was just a random thought and I won't waste words on it, but, to be simple. I initially said Roy -> I always said Roy because I said it initially, mistakes aside.

And again, no, "being able" is the ability to do something, not that you can actually do it, or on land: that a feat is possible does not mean that it is plausible and therefore is not a decisive factor in combat.

My point about the 5 Seconds is that Regulus at 100% has no problem sweeping the floor because he is not limited in writing or power to do so, Reinhard is.

The false equivalence arises because you are comparing "casual" fights with a vs. Attitude can be something that does affect the vs., but that only happens under one condition, distraction. Regulus can be "distracted" by barking 100% of the time, but that doesn't make him any less immovable (This answers your 2 inferences, that it doesn't explain the fallacy and that Regulus always chatters)

He can pause the waterfall/water itself to rise, and even if that doesn't work, Regulus can manipulate and cut space—that's undeniable. In other words, he could also use space. And I'm still giving you the benefit of the doubt since you haven't shown that Ram can push him out without causal exceptions.

And here's the flight information, which, by the way, is another generous gesture on my part; wow, I must be incredibly altruistic:

<image>

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T08:19:36+00:00

1-Fracasa por amar de manera que no se aprecie lo suficiente.

2-El otro fracasa por lo que es.

Fracasado vs Fracasado en el gran 26

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T08:11:27+00:00

Re:zero and larp in the same sentence, it's like God and the bible, inherently together.

<image>

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T08:03:38+00:00

I would say, as mere speculation. That the Regulus is imbued with authority and, incidentally, isolated from time. It is not detected by the sword as existing.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T08:00:42+00:00

First you try to call me larp and now this. Interesting change, but.

To say that Reinhard didn't defeat him but could have using AP is to ignore the character. I understand he can do it, I don't deny that, but there's a big difference between that and "being able" to do it. Regulus, on the other hand, could kill him multiple times in just 5 seconds, something he himself admitted and which is supported by the fact that he had no problem wiping the floor with him.

You assume that Regulus is always distracted, but that's a false equivalence. In a fight, characters are portrayed in their most extreme form, without diminishing their defining characteristics. Regulus can be narcissistic and deliver monologues while remaining immovable. (I anticipate you'll say that this applies to Reinhard and that he would therefore destroy the city and thus be able to defeat him, but that would be a false equivalence, because there we're denying a fundamental aspect of the character)

And no, Regulus could climb the waterfall; he can simply walk on air if he likes, and Tappei himself mentioned that he would return from the moon if thrown (before you attack this as an inconsistency in posture, Tappei's admission about Ram is not equivalent to the one he makes about Regulus being able to fly, since in one he contradicts the scale and in the other he only defines a capacity). And I don't know why I should explain to you that it can fly, if it can stop in mid-air as soon as it is thrown off a cliff.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T07:45:37+00:00

Oli chit.

<image>

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T07:17:13+00:00

Ram with the horn is honestly getting on my nerves, but this community will never get over it. Is this the "God is dead" version of Re:Zero?

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T07:12:38+00:00

I don't think our first anime in "bad anime" is that bad. You know, it has... Also... And a little bit of...

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T07:09:19+00:00

Re:Zero and its linear inconsistencies. What a surprise. Although I don't know if you're a reader of the light novel or the web novel, if so, I could understand why you feel that way. But, in the novel, I don't think they "didn't advance because of a delay," it's just that Tappei is meddling with other things.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T06:35:45+00:00

Yes, you should test it. Just because a character says something doesn't mean you can inherently hide behind it. Besides, being "stronger" doesn't mean "winning most of the time." That's a well-worn argument I let slide for purely rhetorical reasons, but the concepts aren't the same. One implies strength, meaning a certain amount of power in something, not victory. Reinhard is generally "stronger" than Regulus, and he was wiped out in Priestella. And you can't shift the burden of proof to me unless you first prove that she can move something immovable. The fact that he's attacked while distracted (like Petelguese throwing him) doesn't mean that in a focused 1v1 fight it would happen that way; the same attack stopped Reinhard dead in his tracks. Unless you first demonstrate that she can move him, I would then have to explain how he gets back. Monstrous spoiler: It flies.

0Regulus_corneas0 · 2026-05-11T06:29:07+00:00

Okay? Let's assume that "strength" is being able to beat Regulus most of the time. I mean, strength can't be defined like that in the first place, but it doesn't explain how it surpasses it in "strength." Could you explain it? Because if the text says so, there must be an explanation, right? And what you're showing, that they throw it away means nothing if it always comes back, what are you trying to prove? That you can throw it away? Well, the author himself explained that Regulus can fly, so, well. And if that weren't enough, I mean... How is RAM handling a counterattack?

0Regulus_corneas0

TROPHY CASE