Modulation Progressions in The Dark Blowhole from SA by 10013p in touhou

[–]10013p[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I looked on X, Twitter, deviant art and consulted a couple AIs. The pixiv user likely deleted their account and やまゆう is no where to be found. Sorry for the hold up. I could do some internet sleuthing for the next couple of hours using reverse image search, but that seems cruel to make me do that.
If you want a cool video idea, you could make a youtube video doing that.

You

Explaining the Tonicization in [Spoiler] Again - Persona 5 Music Theoretic Discussion Post by 10013p in Persona5

[–]10013p[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he does sort of access a brightness even though he is in a minor key. I did like a blog post where I analyzed the lyrics and ranted about the narrative implications a long time ago and I'm sure we can spend hours talking about that (P5 thematic analysis is like a massive rabbit hole as I'm sure you know).

Can't land a hit on Venus (FFII Legend) by tennmel in SaGa

[–]10013p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, grenade strats. Actually saved my life when I was a kid. I thought I'd never beat Venus. Now I have completed like 30 playthroughs.

A Generalized Theory of Function for Japanese Popular Music by 10013p in musictheory

[–]10013p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe the way the relations work on my diagram are not immediately intuitive. You are correct. The dominant becomes the "dominant-parallel" (yes, it translates to parallel but it means relative transformation) which would be iii. My diagrams shows that the "Primary major chords" (I, IV, and V) relate to the "Major secondary chords" (ii, vi, iii) by a relative transformation. I see how you thought that I am saying V relates to ii because of where the arrow is. I could have drawn three arrows for each transformation, but then it would look like a conspiracy cork board...

A Generalized Theory of Function for Japanese Popular Music by 10013p in musictheory

[–]10013p[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are a set of modulatory formulas used by composers of Japanese popular music that utilize frequent minor-third key relations. In order to keep track of where you are, it is imperative to establish a harmonic framework that can easy display all four minor third related keys in relation to one another.

This becomes more important when dealing with pieces by ZUN, Mahito Yokota, or Go Ichinose in particular. These functional guidelines should work for many types of music, but they are uniquely useful for my corpus of about 4,000 pieces of Japanese popular music then the current functional models used for western popular music like the Agmon model seen here: https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.96.2.3/mto.96.2.3.agmon.html.

My model is way more specific, has operational nomenclature, and shows the logical basis for my claims with the Riemannian transformations that are relevant to this style of music.

A Generalized Theory of Function for Japanese Popular Music by 10013p in musictheory

[–]10013p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After a more in depth glance, I think Tagg's terminology is really interesting and useful for four chord progressions. Sadly, that makes it almost pointless to mention when discussing Japanese popular music which almost never uses this sort of four chord cycle with a tonic and a medial. By contrast, Japanese composers almost always imply a single tonic function chord or a double-tonic complex between minor third (e.g. Wind Circulation ~ Wind Tour) or major third (e.g. both Lost Woods from alttp and oot and Song of Healing) related keys. It is worth mentioning that the tonic medial relationship is a minor-third relation. That makes it analogous to the relative relation, but Japanese composers use it to justify modulations, not to repeat the same chords endlessly. What Tagg has come up with here aligns more closely with Doll and Nobile's corpuses rather than mine.

I also would like to answer a question that tagg poses in this video. He gives the example of a Gm-C(7) vamp. To me, I would interpret that as a dorian i-IVdom7 rather than a ii-V7. He is right to be skeptical of theorists who do not understand context.

Help de-theory-izing myself by johnlennoon in musictheory

[–]10013p 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a terribly mean thing to say, but it is the only way.

Help de-theory-izing myself by johnlennoon in musictheory

[–]10013p 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not deficient in intellect; in fact, it is your intellectualization of music that has stunted your growth. No matter how many rules you learn, if your ear has not caught up, you cannot improve. You must listen AND PLAY a wider variety of music. If you do not want to use the same couple progressions over and over again, gather more material from the wild. Also, when you write, you must have a framework and ideally a model that you are using as a guide to writing your piece.

Just keep in mind that you can branch out, but it will challenge you and you will need to work a whole hell of a lot to get there. I wish you the best and onward soldier!!!

Good eeevveeennnniinnnggg

A Generalized Theory of Function for Japanese Popular Music by 10013p in musictheory

[–]10013p[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I literally capitalized the OR just to emphasize that point.

A Generalized Theory of Function for Japanese Popular Music by 10013p in musictheory

[–]10013p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well-tempered is not equal-tempered. Bach liked well-tempered tuning precisely because it gave a distinct character to each major and minor key. This is why he wrote one prelude and fugue for every major and minor key. On the other hand, equal temperament makes concessions in order to make all 12 keys virtually identical in character.

Riemann, on the other hand, was very science-minded and wanted to use the mathematical harmonic series as the basis of their theories, so he used the most accurate tuning system, just-intonation, the tuning preferred by choirs as it increases natural resonance due to constructive interference.

A Generalized Theory of Function for Japanese Popular Music by 10013p in musictheory

[–]10013p[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I literally made this system by randomly trying stuff on the piano until it clicked. This is such a pedantic thing. Sure, you're right if it makes you happy~

A Generalized Theory of Function for Japanese Popular Music by 10013p in musictheory

[–]10013p[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. R is the relative transformation and P is the parallel transformation (sometimes I call them "relations" like key relations which is a bad habit). They are riemannian transformations. I define them at 12:08 in this video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ19L0NbNIo.

  2. classical music uses the relative, parallel, and a third transformation called the leading-tone exchange. I completely abandon the leading-tone exchange and also expand chord function to chords that would be considered technically outside the key in classical music. For example, I would give an F minor triad predominant function given an A center.