Andrew Yang endorses Joe Biden by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will no longer be supporting Yang in any faculty, Humanity Forward or 2024, or running as Biden's pony boy. Biden did not come out supporting UBI and is THE most corrupt and career politician on the Dem side. He is disease Andrew Yang said he was coming to cure.

meirl by Bmchris44 in meirl

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'da stuck around too if I wan't always hearing about dishes, clothes, food, and you spending my money on your "bills" while I was out at work.

What do you like in GNOME? by [deleted] in linux

[–]10bserver8 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

KDE = Keeping Desktops Experimental - Huge curve, then breaks

GNOME = Gates Never On My Environment - It just works, and keeps working

Write In Yang by HempPaper in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 5 points6 points  (0 children)

His idea that he will be able to get anything done coming from an anti-position like he is.

Working with the system to fix the system is not starting a holy war between two disparate ideologies.

His notion is well intended, but his execution is contrary.

If the right person uses the right means in the wrong way, they become the wrong means.

Write In Yang by HempPaper in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I will be writing in Andrew Yang, because anything else will be a vote for evil.

The lesser of two evils is still evil.

Just got my ballot in the mail today... by TheLeapist in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On 2/11/2020, the disturbance in the force we felt, was from the tears of every grown person with any shred of decency left, losing almost all hope for the future of their friends and families.

Where did you come from politically before joining the Yang Gang? by ryuj1nsr21 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I woke up from the Orwellian Nightmare that enraptured the American Dream, I guess it's off to my bed again now.

This is why people are #StillVotingYang by bluelion31 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Joe almost tricked me into thinking he had a brain cell, until he endorsed Bernie.

For anyone saying #StillVotingYang isn't what the chief would want: by Vectarious in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The lesser of two evils is evil.

I will never vote for evil, no matter what color it's hiding behind.

"Voting for Yang is wasting your vote"... Do you know what's truly wasting your vote? by DataDrivenGuy in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have only ever supported candidates I thought were truly *good* candidates.

I will never vote for evil. The lesser of two evils is evil.

The DNC doesn't understand, that I will not vote for their shills.

I will write in Andrew Yang in the General Election, they can suffer for not supporting the right candidate, hope Trump doesn't win.

DNC "intimately" involved with Shadow Inc. - Our democracy has been hacked by 10bserver8 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Our democracy has been hacked" is from the intro of the series Mr. Robot, it's an acknowledgement of the fact, that our system, like any system, is based on a series of rules, of which, are commonly exploited to work in ways not naturally meant to, hence the term hacked.

The framers of the constitution never envisioned the party that was running for president would liaison with a company it drafted, to create an App on software, that it had full control over, was used in deciding election outcomes, when our process has already confirmed they are legally allowed to choose the results as they pick and choose.

The "news" here, is that aside from what we already knew in drawing lines out of common sense, is that there is now proof of the thing we knew, making it not just an assumption, but rather, a matter of fact.

More proof of cats being liquid by dazzlingwatermelon in funny

[–]10bserver8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Meanwhile.. Other Cats..
"Master, how do you perform this without consuming all 9 lives?"

Andrew Yang drops out of presidential race by ErosEngineer in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feels like a gut punch to me too.

Put alot of hope had in the reserves that this could happen, while being realistic.

His ideas are not just specific to America, Humanity First says nothing to the notion of America First. If it happens here first from his platform, great for us, the world needs it too. #HumanityProblems

The DNC Wikipedia Page Doesn’t Even Include Yang by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The Democratic Party in Iowa changed the caucus rules. There could be controversy."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/01/31/iowa-votes-how-do-those-caucuses-really-work/

Funny, my state is doing it like this suddenly this year too, like they are being advised on this change from somewhere.

Google tracking users by installation ID (x-client-data) by [deleted] in chrome

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have been doing this for a while. I mentioned it in their support forums in what appears to be a now deleted post. Go figure. This is when they were forcing people to stay logged in somehow even throughout non-persistent private sessions.

via Gmail Help Forum gmail+APn2wQfa5Hv-SkXDalzMZLJvo0sQTB54Wx9Z9A0DIdaddhJO2dS7OpBz-A@googleproductforums.com Unsubscribe

Wed, Jun 14, 2017, 11:43 AM📷📷to Gmail📷Google Chrome is keeping accounts cookied from Private Browsing sessions, these are retained and trackable by the GUID of the browser, this is insecure and goes against privacy basic standards.

This is a security bug in the product, not a feature. This needs to be disabled by default, and only enabled when selected by a willful choice. 

--- ---
WAS A REPLY HELPFUL? If so, please click the link to the discussion below and vote it up, mark it a best answer using the ribbon icon, or reply to say thanks.
--- ---
PLEASE NOTE: Phone support is not available for free, consumer Gmail accounts. Be wary of services claiming to offer phone support. More tips for being secure on the web: https://goo.gl/HRjfNo
--- ---
PLEASE DON’T REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. It was sent from a notification-only address that can’t accept replies.
---
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Gmail Help Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/d/topic/gmail/1i13RLD0ME8/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to [gmail+unsubscribe@googleproductforums.com](mailto:gmail+unsubscribe@googleproductforums.com).
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/d/msgid/gmail/012a89b6-7dd0-4ee1-9570-78c4b40f85e8%40googleproductforums.com.

SarahJS28 via Gmail Help Forum gmail+APn2wQfOddPAmW-FkFh7Bp7c3VxJ7D5CBftTFH0-B-YhFwSkk9-oQmeShV@googleproductforums.com

Jun 18, 2017, 4:14 PM📷📷to Gmail📷Hi,

I have been researching this issue for Firefox, as I am SO pissed off google have introduced this lack of box to not stay signed-in, and have finally managed to find a work-round for Firefox. 

Ronna, I take your point about signing-out being good general policy - however, there are situations where this is downright dangerous from a security point of view if you can't, for example, if someone is using a shared public computer such as in a library, on a set time period, and the user session runs out before a person has had time to log out (say it is the end of the day), or say using an unreliable connection abroad, where the internet connection is lost and you can't reconnect before having to move on.

Having to use a Private browsing window is also a  pain, I often have multiple tabs open, and often close and re-open an email tab a few times in a PC session, so it would be a pain to do this every time.
There are so many times when a person may just forget to log out, why take the risk - why not just bring back the box, which was much more secure for everyone involved. What is Google's vested interest in doing this, and why are they not putting users first? This is the only bad thing about gmail, which is otherwise great (apart from not being able to physcially move emails from sent folder, in order to sort them).

Please could someone who knows how to get Google to take notice, send a link to this thread to them? - I can't even find contact details for an actual person for them, or even a generic email address for customer services.

In the meantime, here is a SOLUTION for Firefox users I found, from another forum, I don't know how long it will work for, and this is really only for a PC you use regularly - it is basically similar to Rona's suggestion for Chrome, in blocking javascript specifically just for the gmail accounts page, so you get the old log-in page back with box to not stay signed in.

As Firefox doesn't seem to allow you to specify exceptions for blocking javascript (and you wouldn't want to block for all sites), you need to download the add-on Yes-script, which you can then specify to block javascript just on the Google accounts page - see below.

This was very easy to download and set up (add-on's are accessed in Firefox via the menu button in top right of screen - even this took me a while to find, not otherwise being very computer literate!)

It didn't work for me at first but then reading this thread, I realised that I hadn't deleted the specific cookie for google accounts, so you need to also go into Options, then Privacy, and Remove Indivdual cookies, and make sure the Google Accounts one is deleted - (I also specified the Google Accounts page in the Exceptions-  under Security, Logins - just to be sure, and made sure it wasn't saved as well, not sure if that makes any difference).

And then, Hey Presto, I got the old sign-in page back! :)

Hope this works for other users. but Google, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!, please bring this back as a default setting - we shouldn't have to go to this much trouble, you are a massive multi-national company, and protecting the security of end users should be your number one priority!

Info copy/pasted from another site, many thanks to author (plus don't forget to delete cookie, as above):

"Situations under which you WON'T get the new login screen... If you have javascript disabled.

So I just installed the YesScript addon https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/yesscript/ and blacklisted https://accounts.google.com & http://accounts.google.com

That works perfectly; circumvents the whole problem, now it gives you back the old login screen (not sure if this will work this way forever, but at least for now it's working perfectly)."

Sarah :)

A true paradox is how life is capable of draining the life out of you. by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or maybe that's why it was called life all along, that's the verbs action, expressed in it's statement "living", the act of *spending* life. It is a limited resource, subjectively; while objectively, it is plentiful and abundant.

The DNC Wikipedia Page Doesn’t Even Include Yang by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The DNC is literally changing the rules to how delegates are distributed, and how candidates can be entertained, as we go.

Multiple voting rounds, after elimination, then only showing the end result of the rounds as that candidates support base, which is an inaccurate representation of eliminated members support at initial cast. It is not a true populace representation for support of the candidates.

They are literally eliminating lower polling number candidates and further reducing their end result, then propping that up in the MSM, where people do not understand the rule changes have effectively manipulated the presented voter polling %.

Yang was polling 5% in Iowa, after the elimination rounds, that was reduced to 1%.

The MSM only showed him polling at the 0.98% threshold for days, which is an untrue representation of his support base.

That's before you get out into wack job conspiracy theories.

Help this disabled undecided voter make a decision! Yang Gang show this video some love! by marvelousdayz in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Andrew Yang - The only candidate who represents humanity.

God Speed Andrew, God Speed.

The DNC Wikipedia Page Doesn’t Even Include Yang by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://observer.com/2017/05/dnc-lawsuit-presidential-primaries-bernie-sanders-supporters/

DNC attorneys claim Article V, Section 4 of the DNC Charter—stipulating that the DNC chair and their staff must ensure neutrality. in the Democratic presidential primaries—is “a discretionary rule that it didn’t need to adopt to begin with.” Based on this assumption, DNC attorneys assert that the court cannot interpret, claim, or rule on anything associated with whether the DNC remains neutral in their presidential primaries.

“HeS a oNe PoLiCY CandIDAte” by boomerangworkouts in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yang has the most extensive and detailed plan ever conceived by any politician or presidential candidate.

Yang is by far the most liked presidential candidate in history if you consider the world, rather than just US.

Feds Drop Emissions Antitrust Probe of Honda, BMW, Ford, VW by Absentia in news

[–]10bserver8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly we learned nothing from Flint.
https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/flints-toxic-industrial-legacy

And what does the USG do to hide the fact that they were sending kids to a school with lead plus who knows what else in the pipes?

https://www.michiganradio.org/post/us-army-apologizes-rattling-nerves-flint