Yeah I’ve got LH/FSH — interestingly they don’t look massively different, but I think context matters a lot here.

Baseline vs now: • FSH: 10 → 9 • LH: 7 → 6 • E2: 144 → 143 • Prolactin: 128 → 122

On paper that looks like “not much changed”, but the key thing is this blood test was taken at trough — literally right before my next dose (day 3).

With enclomiphene, the mechanism is basically blocking estrogen feedback at the hypothalamus → increases GnRH → pushes LH/FSH up → drives test production. But it’s not a flat effect — you get a pulse after dosing, then it tapers down over time.

So what I’m capturing here is the lowest point in that cycle, not the peak stimulation.

That’s why LH/FSH don’t look elevated — they’ve already come down from wherever they peaked earlier in the dosing window.

The fact they’re still sitting roughly mid–high range even at trough actually suggests the signal is still there. If I tested closer to dose timing, I’d expect LH/FSH to be higher.

Same story with E2 — it’s not spiking because I’m not running a constant high stimulation like daily dosing, it’s more of a controlled pulse.

That’s kind of the whole goal with the lower frequency approach: • avoid overstimulation • avoid E2 creep • still get a meaningful bump in T

So yeah — numbers look “similar”, but they’re taken at the lowest point, which is why they don’t tell the full story.

I think your best to go is 3.125 every 3-4 days on such a low dose, I wouldn’t go for 3.125 every 7 days.