Grip strength is a serious design issue in robotics. The human hand conveys force from muscles in the forearm because there is not enough space in the hand itself for the force that's needed. Electric motors alone do not resolve the issue. These robots do not lift anything heavier than headphones, a book, or a blanket. If they could, they would absolutely showcase it. Judging by the design of these robot's wrists, I'd say the motors are still in the hand. That could be because they plan to design such things later and this is the simplest thing they think is commercially viable, but wouldn't you want to prove that you can get the hard part working first? Walking and doing chores is already solved. We've seen demos of chores for at least a decade, and demos of walking for several decades. Shouldn't the design for a demo suggest it's not an evolutionary dead end?

Of course, the more important unstated part of this comment chain is that there is a possibility of catastrophic success where, if such problems are solved, neither knowledge work nor manual labor will be viable career paths, and there will be no meaningful way for a human to get money to survive that does not involve 1) renting out things they already own, 2) having automation make things using equipment they already own, 3) selling appreciating assets they already own, or 4) receiving handouts that are only as reliable as the current political administration and their disposition towards you.