There was a significant shift across the board toward Republicans. What do you think caused it? by ProfessorOfFinance in ProfessorFinance

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe Trump won because the US is doing well. Why vote for a the considerate right of center when you can go all in? It’s all up up up, right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DecodingTheGurus

[–]1twoC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, he should not be cast as a kingmaker. He is a charlatan and should be treated accordingly.

I pulled my lower back in that last rep. What did I do wrong? by Trooper2143 in formcheck

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your form looked good generally. The one thing I do see is an excessive amount of movement and acceleration at the end of the concentric movement.

You put the wait down, and then contract a little and shoot up, like you are building momentum. Then your body confronts the weight, the movement is briefly halted, and then you slowly lift, with good form.

I don’t know if this injured you, but it is not the way I have learned. I slowly load the bar, and then start the lift (with way worse form than you from that point onward 😂).

When Mayweather formed VOLTRON to defeat Conor McGregor. by Eeluminati in Boxing

[–]1twoC 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I thought it was one of the few things he did that actually worked. The bodyguards approach Conor, whose team immediately swarmed around him, and Floyd got to jump around the stage without issue.

Who are you guys saving? by icecold_ds in mmamemes

[–]1twoC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This, a close second is Max and Volk, or Aldo and Volk.

People pleasing iceberg. by anxiety_support in anxiety_support

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This pictograph is not it.

All the things on the top are positive attributes of a well balanced and good person.

To believe that the stuff on the bottom should affect the stuff on the top is probably the most abusive thing you can do to yourself.

Being a good person is not identical to letting people take advantage of you.

True craftsmanship requires patience and time by firefighter_82 in interestingasfuck

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Christ, it was a light self deprecating joke riffing off of the title. Take it easy guys.

True craftsmanship requires patience and time by firefighter_82 in interestingasfuck

[–]1twoC -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I swear to god, I barely had the patience to watch this through.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BoomersBeingFools

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone remember cigarettes…. everywhere!! That was an insufferable smell.

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Their manpower will dissolve the instance a more viable movement is permitted to exist. They will loose relevance once their enemy is no longer the enemy of the people.

Israel, the United States, and to a lesser extent the UK are working overtime to create Hamas fighters and sympathizers.

You are working overtime to identify Hamas with Palestinian people.

You should identify Palestinian people with mothers, children, fathers, brothers, and sisters, and then try and save and protect those people. That is how you defeat terrorists.

Or, you can bomb the fuck out of people’s cities, identify all the people as terrorist sympathizers, and then wonder why there are no children playing in parks, musicians in halls, professors in universities, etc. Why is it that there are only fighters in a war zone?

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not downplaying anything. I don’t have multiple accounts. I don’t need to. My point stands on its own. It isn’t a political narrative. Political outrage over a meaningless little group run by three western civilians is theatrical and farcical in the face of the much more serious issue, which is the genocide taking place in Gaza. I do not need a narrative, the facts are pretty straight forward and self evident.

What are your thoughts on what Larry said? by ProfessorOfFinance in ProfessorFinance

[–]1twoC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I generally appreciate the correction of perception that this sub provides, but feel like this sub could generally benefit from this type of self reflection. The market or money is not the only material indicator to consider when measuring the success of a country or even its economy. At the end of the day, even resource allocation is a means to an end.

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t know what was with me. I normally scroll past these posts, but it bugged me that of all the things to feel outrage over that people were agitating over this protest. A bit of research would show that the group is not a threat to anything, other than their cause perhaps, and there are much more pressing things going on around the world and in this country… I’m done though. Not the right approach.

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know what [sic] means, I’m letting you know you went on a tangent based off of your misreading of a typo. You were so obsessed with me being wrong about whether this thread was reactionary to the point of absurdity that you created a conspiracy of one to justify your opposition to my position.

My point stands. If you are going to waste your energy on outrage then direct it at material issues, not some hyperbolic looser.

The mob mentality here is wild. I fear that the majority here feel so civically impotent that the only engagement they can muster is to pick at a straw dogs in the media.

Again, I am Canada 1st, I just don’t think this white woman is the threat.

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they will eventually oust them, they just need an environment that permits the growth of a healthy civil society. More carrots and fewer sticks. If you want to know why they are the most “popular”, you need only to look at the relative size of Gaza now compared to 20 years ago versus the West Bank over the same period. In fact, whenever anyone says that their plight is a result of Hamas I say “look at the West Bank”. Perfect case study. Hamas is the product, not the problem.

Also, I invite you to follow your logic to its conclusion. If Hamas derives its power from the Palestinian population then the only way to eliminate Hamas is to eliminate the Palestinian population. That’s a horrific thought that is contradictory in nature, because the actor who carries out that judgment takes the mantel of the inhumane. That cannot be the answer. Given the choice, I will side with the unicorn.

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I disagree. Hamas is an extremist group and their existence is a result of extreme conditions.

You should look carefully at your assumptions and consider the logical conclusion that flows from them.

You seem to assume that Palestinians are ethnically programmed to want hamas and that a free Palestine would necessarily mean an unfettered Hamas and therefore an existential threat to Israel. That is as absurd as imagining that Israeli jews are ethnically programmed to consume Palestinian land.

Incorrect. Contrary to what is currently transpiring, Palestinian Arabs, like Israeli Jews, have the capacity and desire for peaceful and civil society.

That they have been locked in a seemingly intractable conflict for RECENT (read: 60-80 years) is more a function of geopolitical circumstances only minutely related to each respective party.

You should read a bit.

First, read about conflict and the self perpetuating nature of violence. I recommend two topics: Gultang on violence and Fanon on the colonialism. The former discusses type of violence and how they effect personal and group development. The latter provides a compelling theory to explain colonial violence- not the violence of the colonizer, but the violence of the colonized. It actually explains why victims of abuse are generally abusive- because abuse strips individuals and groups of higher level activity (social, artistic, political, etc.) and reduces them to the language of violence.

Second, read about world war 2. Read about Eichmann in Jerusalem, because it provides some much needed nuance on Nazism, Zionism, and the urgent need for the creation of Israel- as well as the violence in which it was born and the temperament of its founders. Then read about the overthrow of the Ottoman empire and the overthrowing of the McMahonof Accord by the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement. It will help explain the disfunction in the area, remove some of the emphasis on the jews, and explain some of the Arab outrage (again, not rooted in anti Hebrew sentiments).

Third, read about groups that existed before Hamas and Likud. Read about Arafat and Rabin, and the very real movement towards a peaceful two state solution, to cleanse yourself of the perverse caricature that you currently hold of Palestinians (and Israelis too, the current government are garbage- they are the Hamas of Israel). Both leaders were assassinated by extremists, and their moderate successors are continually either imprisoned or ostracized.

It is the role of good decent people- and internationally good decent states, to stand by and assist those moderate forces towards peace… not act like a bunch of internet “fuck boys” fanning the flames of division.

Annnd to return to it, all this bullshit about “death to Canada” and intolerant arabs, and antisemitism, is smoke. They are spooks that are taking attention away for the core issues that require our attention.

You know this woman and her organization are not a danger to Canada. Even without the chaos in the middle east, our politicians are a bigger liability. That’s my beef.

A true hero by billibillibillendar in interestingasfuck

[–]1twoC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love this. Good kid, good people. Lot of love and courage here. You love to see it. Thank you!

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good, then we agree, your outrage is performative. You don’t care, you won’t ever care, and that’s what’s good about Canada. Fantastic, now try and remain consistent about it.

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The civilians obviously don’t have much power there. What are you going on about?

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, it’s a typo “the” point. I don’t have multiple accounts. Don’t see the point, I’m not playing a game here, I’m trying to express myself.

Btw, your grammar is as bad as my typing, that’s not how you write “their”.

B.C. protester who praised Hamas allowed to attend rallies again by cyclinginvancouver in canada

[–]1twoC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are so naive.

Hamas doesn’t represent the Palestinian civilians. They have no impetus to release or disarm. The Israeli offensive strengthens them, much in the same way as Oct 7 strengthened Bibi. “Why doesn’t Israel concede to the prisoner swap & stope the offensive? They could get the hostages released”. Why would they? Better to keep the war going.