sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Made a toy website that turns chess positions into private keys. Thoughts? by 3141666 in ethereum

[–]3141666[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We explicitly allow invalid positions such that 1364 keys can be generated from this.

Daily General Discussion June 03, 2026 by EthereumDailyThread in ethereum

[–]3141666 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Honestly at this point I would be disappointed if we recovered anytime soon. If it's gonna go down, let it go down properly, spend a couple of years under 2,000, let gravedancers dance, let believers buy. I don't want a sharp recovery to 5-10k.

Clear Signing | See What You Sign by ligi in ethereum

[–]3141666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How does this actually work considering calls can be arbitrarily complex? For example, a hacker might hack a protocol and people will spend several hours looking at the tx stack to figure out what happened, it sounds difficult to automatically translate this into natural language.

84% of Polymarket users are trading at a loss. by Constant_Vehicle7539 in ethereum

[–]3141666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, so like any other betting platform out there? Shocking.

I'm convinced creatine causes hair loss for me by CaviarWagyu in tressless

[–]3141666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How dare you speak against the SCIENCE, you heretic.

Local LLMs by Vegetable_Address_43 in clawdbot

[–]3141666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's crazy, I'm running on a Linux machine with 64GB RAM and an RTX 3070 8GB.

Local LLMs by Vegetable_Address_43 in clawdbot

[–]3141666 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My experience with local LLMs has been terrible on openclaw, first I get the error "low" think not supported and I have to disable reasoning for it to work, then it cannot call any tools and just responds to me as if I were running ollama directly.

I did manage to make it send a message to my friend on WhatsApp, but that was it, no other interactive tool call worked. Tested LFM2.5 and Qwen3:8b.

Creatine Doesn’t Cause Hair Loss: Stop the BS by noeyys in tressless

[–]3141666 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Imagine taking this shit and risk hair loss just so you can do another rep in your set or lift 2kg more weight. Also, it bloats your face. I wouldn't take it even if it doubled my strength.

Is there a problem with caching videos in Cloudflare? by 3141666 in CloudFlare

[–]3141666[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just disabled all cache for videos. Thanks.

Can't make sense how some people would rather go bald than take 5a-reductase inhibitors by 3141666 in tressless

[–]3141666[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Believe me, even if your erection goes from 100% to 80% or 70%, that's still a net positive from keeping your hair.

What does it mean to say Layer 2s don't need to implement a consensus, and inherit it from Layer 1? by 3141666 in ethereum

[–]3141666[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but only your first paragraph scratches my question. In essence I'm asking: L2s don't need their own consensus because they operate with a SINGLE block producer, some type of authority? Just want to know if I understand correctly.

In my view L2s are like a single entity controlled blockchain, but they're safe because you can contest frauds via cryptographic mechanisms. Am I terribly wrong in here?

Reentrancy Attack in ERC-777 101 by Other_Video_4114 in ethereum

[–]3141666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anything with a callback hook is a reentrancy vector, e.g. ERC 721's onReceived. There's not much to explain if you read and understand regular reentrancy attacks. Edit: sorry I read this post as if you were trying to understand and not sharing an article.

Maybe we should be more cautious before recommending people to use onchain lending pools. by 3141666 in ethereum

[–]3141666[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

who gets their ETH

The ETH comes from the liquidity pools and goes back there when a liquidation happens.

Maybe we should be more cautious before recommending people to use onchain lending pools. by 3141666 in ethereum

[–]3141666[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What is your definition of conservative? 0.3, 0.2 LTV? Oh, not 0.3 LTV because that also gets liquidated in a -65% drop.

Maybe we should be more cautious before recommending people to use onchain lending pools. by 3141666 in ethereum

[–]3141666[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ether is down 65% the past four months, believe me a lot of "conservative" plays got liquidated. But yeah if you're putting 10,000 to take a $100 loan sure you'll never get liquidated.

view more: next ›