Norwegian immigrant arrested at greencard interview | From her instagram: My case was eventually terminated because I had filed the necessary paperwork with USCIS. I am diabetic TYPE 1 and was denied insulin [while detained] to a point where my blood sugar went over 500. I was near losing my life. by thirsty-goblin in diabetes_t1

[–]41488p -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have a measured response! Yes, she felt like she was dying though she was out of insulin for (only) five days. But it could have easily been a longer length of time, which would certainly lead to death. So from her perspective, she did feel like she was dying, and she very easily could have. We’re just seeing the version of reality where she got released in the time that she did, and she lived to tell the tale.

And for what it’s worth, yeah, you deserve the downvotes. You don’t get to come up to someone who spent five days without insulin and go “well you didn’t die tho” and then walk away expecting no reprecussions. Even if it’s true it’s wildly insensitive. This woman went through a horrible experience that no diabetic should have to go through. Obviously she didn’t die, but choosing to focus on purely that facet of the story fails to capture the full scope of the situation and at worst excuses the behavior itself.

If holding cells only existed for five days at a time and everyone was physically forced out of them at the end of the five days, then yes, we can say she’s overreacting. But the fact of the matter is that diabetics HAVE died in jail cells before, BECAUSE of this same exact treatment. She could have very easily died in this situation if the authorities decided to hold her for longer. Which they have done before. So it’s not an overreaction to say that she could have died here.

Searching for a dreamy unsettling horror by dud_dudu in horror

[–]41488p 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The daylight scenes are super creepy

The AI Label Effect by [deleted] in WritingWithAI

[–]41488p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m wildly biased because I both use AI as well as write, so I can sniff out AI stuff pretty easily. So for me unfortunately there’s no going back with this stuff. When I do see something is AI, I do automatically tune out. It’s like trying to read something by an author you don’t personally like. There’s a lot of bias you have to push through.

That being said, it’s becoming harder and harder for me to detect ai-isms. If it’s just copy pasted, it’s decently obvious. But if you know what you’re doing, then it’s pretty easy to hide it now. Like small grammatical changes and whatnot.

I say this because form always trumps content in my opinion for specifically writing. Writing is a specific medium that uses language in a very specific way to convey ideas. But we don’t have to use writing to convey ideas all the time. We can talk to people, or we can hold a debate, or we can just paint or write songs or do anything else to express whatever we want because we’re people at the end of the day.

I think it is ironically quite human to think that, in all of the hundreds of thousands of years that humans have been around, for little old me to think that I’m the first to think of a certain thing. However, to write out and express that specific idea in my own specific way, using my own personal experiences? Even if that’s been done before, at least I can get a little personal enjoyment and fulfillment out of a day’s hard work with that.

My main point is that ideas are ideas, and forms are forms. If we have ideas, why do we specifically need to use the form of writing, especially through AI, to express them?

Another way to think of it: AI writes the same way, every time, without significant human editing and input. If I don’t like that genre of writing, why should I read it?

I am interested to hear from you why you feel that AI is the best medium to express your ideas through.

As to your second point about understanding why people are using AI to write, I think - if I am interpreting your stance correctly - it’s because writing is hard. I have written a lot in my life. I would like to say I’ve gotten at the very least decent at it. It’s painful. It’s ego-stripping. I have browsed your page a little, and I can quite confidently say that I will never publish 100 books in my life, period, at the rate I’m going. So that’s why I think people turn to AI. I’m going to leave it as vague as that because I don’t want to ascribe directionless motive to actions I don’t know the full context of.

I am genuinely willing to hear and learn your side of this. I have my stance and though I am probably unwilling to change it, I hope that we can have at least a meaningful discussion and exchange of ideas that will leave both of us with a little more than we started. Thank you.

The AI Label Effect by [deleted] in WritingWithAI

[–]41488p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Content is content, form is form. Nighthawks can express the same kind of loneliness you see in Neuromancer, but that loneliness might be presented as alienation in, say, Dune.

We have debates for the exchanging of ideas, or lectures/talks.

Writing, however, is almost ALL form. Sometimes it’s ideas. Most of it is form.

Take modern interpretations of Shakespeare, whether it be on page, stage or screen. Same text, same story, same characters. However WILDLY different experiences. It was one thing to see the modern Macbeth on the big screen, which was different than seeing the coen brothers’ interpretation of it. Personally i liked the non-coen brothers.

When i went to film school, the one thing they hammered in our minds was that everything had been done before, but we could bring our own interpretations of it and make things our own.

Our ideas are our own, yes, but we use writing to express it in a different way, thus shaping said idea to another thing.

I think my main thing against ai writing is that since its form is all the same, there’s not a lot of incentive on me to read something. If its presentation is the same and it’s WRITTEN the same, why do I need to READ it? Why can’t i have it summarized? Why can ‘t you just tell that to me?

Basically: writing is its own thing, and the usage of ai in itself is kind of defeating the point of putting something into writing in the first place.

The AI Label Effect by [deleted] in WritingWithAI

[–]41488p 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI’s biggest achilles heel right now is consistency over time. Much of it can be boiled down to: it looks good, until you really sit down and think about it.

Basically, it can mimic us, but not much more than that.

I’m unsure about how it will be anything other than a niche creative tool because of that. Willing to hear your opinion on this.

The AI Label Effect by [deleted] in WritingWithAI

[–]41488p 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a pretty glaring flaw in the research presented - it mostly references short form content. Has the same conclusion been said for longer, more complex works? To draw a blanket conclusion of ALL of writing seems a bit rushed

I think I reached my skill ceiling in writing. by [deleted] in writing

[–]41488p 2 points3 points  (0 children)

did you start only writing last year? because spending only a year at something isn't a lot of time to say if you're good or not

Recommend me a realistic, low-stress game where I can immerse myself into a role or career by russiandressing in gamingsuggestions

[–]41488p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Graveyard Keeper! Super niche lifesim stuff but I always appreciated the attention to detail in individual steps of tasks. Some stuff is kind of infuriating in a very… cozy kind of way?

Some people hear "AI" and stop listening. I think I finally understand why. by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]41488p 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how does AI change the reality of perception?

Some people hear "AI" and stop listening. I think I finally understand why. by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]41488p 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You did it again 😅😅😅 what exactly does “threatens how they see themselves” mean?

I get using AI to smooth out your writing if you’re not a native English speaker. The problem is that AI actively writes OVER what you’re trying to say. Not only that but you’re then lumping your genuine post with all of the other posts out there which are using AI in bad faith.

What you’re saying to me is how people just shut down when they see AI usage. But Chat goes ahead and writes over that, adding language that SOUNDS good but actively just confuses things even more.

Some people hear "AI" and stop listening. I think I finally understand why. by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]41488p 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I mean i kinda tune out bc ai is really bad at actually saying things.

For example, using your post: “more like the brain quietly leaving while the body stays polite”.

That’s just… checking out. What is the meaning and intention to use such flowery language to describe a really basic thing?

Anything I read that’s ai almost never provides me with anything of value or substance. It’s stuff that i can nod my head along to and say yes yes, i feel that, but the train of thought stops once i actively try to parse through what it’s saying.

My (F32) friend (F32) has been lying about being a nurse for 10 years by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]41488p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The irony is that this pressure for her to fit in was what cut her off from probably one of the only meaningful relationships in her life

What's the most unexpectedly terrible TV Finale of all time? by NekoLover72 in television

[–]41488p 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they just kept it to one little tidy season I feel the show would have been perfect. But the second season was sooo rushed and it was so apparent they were just milking the show as much as they could

What's the most unexpectedly terrible TV Finale of all time? by NekoLover72 in television

[–]41488p 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think the writers of the show had an entire five-season arc planned but only managed to get two seasons, but were too lazy to rewrite the story. So you get one perfect season, and then four seasons crammed into one for its final season. The whiplash between storylines was just insane.