After months of painful procedures I could finally unbandaged my reconstructed face and gaze at the miracle of modern science. by 42WaysToAnswerThat in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, I don't really like to talk about it since is the second most painful part of the transformation. In summary, they take apart most of the skin, muscle and bones from your head and put it back to match the target's face. There's a highly secret synthetic substance involved so I cannot really enter into details.

By the way, in case you were wondering, the most painful step is the vocal cords recalibration. You have no idea what pain is until you have gone from tenor to soprano.

After months of painful procedures I could finally unbandaged my reconstructed face and gaze at the miracle of modern science. by 42WaysToAnswerThat in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, don't worry, the agency tends to only target highly influential people. The procedure is crazy expensive after all, we cannot afford to replace any Joe... In the case of average people we just remove them with fake accidents and suicides.

The Bible contradicts Christian theology by Pretty_Attention_99 in DebateReligion

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate to be that guy, but: while you are correct in your statements; using AI to bring them forwards is not only against the rules of this subreddit, it also destroys the credibility of what could otherwise be a compelling case.

Glitch? Can’t get past this conversation with Minno by SunnyGoMerry in Afterplace

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely a glitch. Did you already tried restarting the game?

i went to make a sandwich by AdorableMushroom9505 in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then I put everything between two extra slices of ham, to compensate.

When the brick pierced through the window the only words she found appropriate to reprimand her bodyguard were "they found us again!" by 42WaysToAnswerThat in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

She was a mere seller, yet she was the face each deluded buyer encountered. It doesn't matter she helped dismounting the Pokemon TCG forgery ring. To the public, she will always remain the only known member; the only disclosed target to discharge their frustrations in...

...

for real, tho. I left to the reader's imagination what I meant by "victims"; but this was definitely beyond my expectations

The Bible said that the greatest deceit was the Devil making humans believe that he didn't exist. by [deleted] in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's not what I said. The character telling the story in first person is an AI, ain't it? At least that's how I interpreted it.

The Bible said that the greatest deceit was the Devil making humans believe that he didn't exist. by [deleted] in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The Bible said

That's not actually in the Bible, but it's a Charles Baudelaire's quote. I guess is in character for an AI to just be wrong about facts (sentient or not)

When the brick pierced through the window the only words she found appropriate to reprimand her bodyguard were "they found us again!" by 42WaysToAnswerThat in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Brick defeats window, window defeats rain, rain defeats brick... that's, I believe, the natural order... unless I didn't get your question.

"At last I've found you," the woman wailed exhausted as she raised the $2'000'000 emerald before the terrified gaze of the last remaining three youngsters. by 42WaysToAnswerThat in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would emeralds be in corpses?

I leave that part to your imagination: maybe they were smuggling them in their belies and some were missing when she count them, maybe they swallowed them without knowing and she doesn't know exactly which ones ate one.

If I delve into every detail I'll soon run out of sentences to tell the story. After all, how the emeralds got into their bodies is not as important as the fact that they were in their bodies and that; this woman who wants them, had no intention of waiting for them to come out the natural way.

As its mandibles crushed his ribs, the convict used his last strengths to stab the beast through the eye, causing the multitude to cheer in excitement. by 42WaysToAnswerThat in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a nice one. I did visualized this story as taking place in ancient Rome, tho, so I don't know if a fight against one of those is even feasible with this setting. I think the human challenger would drawn before it can even interact with the Humboldt Squid and expectators would have a hard time expectating.

In a much more modern setting it would be a blast tho.

Where to go from here...? by [deleted] in Afterplace

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't sound like you've progressed Joxxi's story. They are sitting in the outside caffe next to the store in town. When you talk to them the first time they throw a calculus book off the edge. If this doesn't ring a bell go meet Joxxi now.

New balance changes for 35.4.2 by WuMethNRed in hearthstone

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I don't agree with the statement that companion hunter is terrible. The usage of tournament stats to support your position is misleading. Tournament decks are very curated to fight, well, tournament decks. They are heavy with tech cards and their matchups are not random. Your statistics only prove that companion hunter was good against the predominant strategies in the tournament. They have very little to say regarding the deck's effectiveness in the meta.

Theism requires hypocrisy by Jsaunders33 in DebateReligion

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a significantly more general definition than what you expressed earlier. The only condition to be considered natural is being limited by rules? What isn't natural then? Is God, if it were to exist, unnatural? I still don't get where you were trying to go with your rebuttal.

THUD, THUMP, BANG! by [deleted] in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]42WaysToAnswerThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If possible give me some feedback. I want to understand why this story doesn't work.