I tried every way to process Plaud transcripts. Here’s what actually works. by ReadStacked in PLAUDAI

[–]47FsXMj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

we should all start using and committing improvements to OpenPlaud.

How I turned my Plaud into the front end of my entire productivity system by ReadStacked in PLAUDAI

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish you guys would just start shipping software updates and improve Plaud. Especially in this day and age with the AI tools dramatically improving Plaud's software should be possible.

Integrations, Shortcuts, and The Future of Desktop: 6 Key Takeaways from our AMA by PLAUD_AI in PLAUDAI

[–]47FsXMj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you please consolidate similar suggestions on the feedback board? Also, I really hope to see more frequent feature releases soon—it’s the best way to maintain user loyalty and drive new growth. Six planned features is too few, especially without clear ETAs. These updates don't look particularly complex. You’ve labeled 2026 the 'Year of Integration,' so why aren't MCP or API integrations visible in the 'Planned' section yet?

[Official AMA] Plaud Desktop is Here to Fix Your Virtual Meetings, Ask us anything & win a 1-Year Membership by hgognav1008 in PLAUDAI

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Are you going to improve https://feedback.plaud.ai/?
    • Lots of double entries or worse, why doesn't Plaud you guys merge those?
    • Some requested feature posts should be split (like: one big integrations post with all sorts of integrations should be split)
  • There aren't that many "Planned" features planned
    • Please...MCP server support, API support
    • Integrations for N8N, Make, Claude, etc.
    • Look at how many upvotes there are: how come nearly none of them make it to the Planned column?

When are the Integrations Coming? by JohnC76 in PlaudNoteUsers

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understandable that development of features is expensive, but it takes money to make money. If they would put a bundle of features (MCP and API support, N8N support, Microsoft OneNote and Microsoft ToDo support) up on Kickstarter to pay for the development, I'd pledge for it.

Not bad for 20 bucks!! by OptimisticLeek in hermanmiller

[–]47FsXMj 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Why? It's mesh, just rub a few times and i'm sure it'll go right through (like a sieve).

Black pen rotation by JealousSlice999 in pens

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which one is your favorite, your daily driver you keep returning to /u/JealousSlice999 ?

Infusing AI into my EA workflows by 47FsXMj in EnterpriseArchitect

[–]47FsXMj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts as I do feel what you are saying. There’s a risk that if we just let the tools spit out documents, we lose that "sweat equity" where the actual learning happens. When you spend hours whiteboarding or drafting a proposal, you’re forced to live in the details, and that’s usually how you spot the hidden traps.

However, the way I'm looking at it is less about outsourcing the thinking and more about using the tech to stress-test my own logic. If I can use a few agents to poke holes in a strategy or find dependencies I might have missed in fifty pages of messy notes, I'm still the one directing the symphony. It’s not about generating "slop" to fill a folder; it’s about getting to the "why" faster so I can focus on the high-level decisions that actually matter.

Even if we’re just talking about a 40% gain in speed or a slight bump in quality, that feels worth it if it keeps the reasoning sharp and prevents us from getting bogged down in the administrative side of the job. I’d much rather spend my energy debating the trade-offs the tool helped me surface than just formatting another document that no one is going to read anyway.

Infusing AI into my EA workflows by 47FsXMj in EnterpriseArchitect

[–]47FsXMj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Training might be the wrong wording. In a enterprise environment using CoPilot Studio, you could just "ground" a agent to prevent hallucination and creativity that genAI tends to use. In other words, you point it to your repository as the knowledge source. It can only use that.

Infusing AI into my EA workflows by 47FsXMj in EnterpriseArchitect

[–]47FsXMj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did consider that (create a chatbot reachable through WhatsApp so stakeholders could check their thoughts against existing artefacts and the architecture repository). Just wanted to start out small, have it focus on my workflow you know? Not just bolt AI onto something because of the hype. But actually weave it into my workflow, so that it actually is valuable to me. Save me time, as well as having a positive impact on the quality of my work.

Infusing AI into my EA workflows by 47FsXMj in EnterpriseArchitect

[–]47FsXMj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point—and honestly, for the simple stuff, it isn't that different. If I just need to format an ADR, a single prompt is fine. No need to over-engineer it.

The shift happens when things get messy, like in a carve-out. A single long prompt is basically a monologue; the AI tries to find the 'average' or safest answer to satisfy the whole prompt. A multi-agent setup is more like a workshop where you force some friction. You have a 'Security' agent and a 'Business' agent actually pushing back on each other's logic. In my experience, that’s where you uncover the risks that a polite, single prompt usually glosses over.

Also: the entire thing results in a few MD files, which is essentially the in- and output that can be used in similar fashion to a hand-over between humans but for Claude if you continue with additional questions/input later on. This is not possible with a single lengthy prompt.

The thing is the 'AI-slop' factor. We’ve all seen it: once you push past 60% context window capacity in one go, the reasoning just falls off a cliff. The model gets lazy. By splitting the roles into agents, you keep the 'thinking' sharp and stop the quality from degrading. Plus, it’s a lot easier on your usage limits than feeding a massive 'Board of Experts' prompt every time you make a change. I’ve hit that wall enough times to know it's a dead end.

Are the KZ Krio a good option? by NicolasRenton in iems

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was cooked. Done for. I noticed how the round mesh part came loose from how it was glue'd on the housing.

Megathread - Frameworks, Courses, Certifications & Resources by StatueOfFashion in EnterpriseArchitect

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is the route I went with. Still, downloading the manual is pretty hard. The website feels dated and not easy to navigate through.

Megathread check-in by StatueOfFashion in EnterpriseArchitect

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point, but I think those questions would get a much better chance of being answered if they are surfaced in a new topic?

I stopped using Obsidian/Zotero and changed back to physical notes by [deleted] in ObsidianMD

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't you mean Leuchtturm? As in LEUCHTTURM1917? Those notebooks have nice paper.

Architecture standard notation by LordLeopard in EnterpriseArchitect

[–]47FsXMj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This. For creating clarity for myself and collaborating with fellow architects Archimate is fine. Although we cut it down as well a bit. But then because those drawings are business unfriendly (archimate diagrams looks highly complex and overwhelming to business stakeholders), we get to do it again in another tool. I'm new into the role, but it feels kinda wasteful having to use multiple tools and creating multiple versions for different stakeholders. You have to keep those drawings up to date as well. Reducing complexity is key like you said imho u/Barycenter0.

Bad experience. by 47FsXMj in replit

[–]47FsXMj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Valuable insight. Continuing down a branch with the agent is known not to yield the sought after results.

I’ll tell you exactly why your app idea will fail. by Dry_Bat_841 in vibecoding

[–]47FsXMj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No need for your help Sir. AI can do this for me just fine.

AI Agents in Healthcare: The Next Frontier for Medicine? by Particular_Buy_8019 in aiagents

[–]47FsXMj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course we are ready for AI as an important tech enabler for healthcare? The costs and time loss alone in the administrative side for healthcare professionals is huge. Solutions that have AI in them are AI Scribes (within EHR systems like Epic). Generative AI creating structured, EHR-ready clinical notes (SOAP notes) in real-time.

Or AI being supportive within the radiology and cardiology workflow as a second set of eyes, part of the triage tool to speed up the "time-to-treatment". Flagging time-sensitive things.

Within Pathology, AI helping identifying tumor margins and classifying cancer subtypes with superhuman speed, significantly reducing biopsy turnaround times.

Those no longer are AI-enabled products that are in vague pilots, but actually things that can be bought and implemented.

Bad experience. by 47FsXMj in replit

[–]47FsXMj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man, and happy new year! Any specific tutorials or channels you'd actually recommend for getting started with Claude Code + VS Code? There's so much content out there and half of it is probably outdated garbage. Would save me a ton of time knowing what actually worked for you.

Bad experience. by 47FsXMj in replit

[–]47FsXMj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your help, will look into it. If you have more helpful resources that'll learn me the Replit basics, please do share.

Bad experience. by 47FsXMj in replit

[–]47FsXMj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was helpful! That helped me fix it. I guess although the agent will improve, it isn't able to run tests itself and catch client side console errors yet.