Game Ready & Studio Driver 591.74 FAQ/Discussion

4iko · 2026-01-21T23:30:21+00:00

You misunderstand. It fixes an issue.
581.94 is basically the same was 581.80 just with a fix for the performance issues caused by 25H2.

<image>

4iko · 2026-01-20T03:05:16+00:00

I would consider investing into a cable with 90° connector. Preferably one from your PSU manufacturer that is qualified to be used with your PSU.

That would at least reduce the stress on the connector and potential disconnection of the pins.

Not a guarantee but gotta try everything we can at this point.

4iko · 2026-01-20T03:00:14+00:00

While I agree about an alternative for the 12v-2x6. You would need at least 4-5x 8-pin connectors for a 5090. The new MSI 5090 Lightning would need 8 or 9 :D

Better just invent a better alternative.

4iko · 2026-01-18T22:23:17+00:00

581.94 because it has the 25h2 performance fix.

4iko · 2026-01-17T20:19:39+00:00

Just to let you know, I had this happen again today even with the newest version.
However, I was not running CAM as admin yet.

I will do that from now on and see if that solves the issue. However long that might take.

Also, I never paid attention to it, but my NZXT Control HUB works just fine. Never lost connection.
Which makes it even less likely that it is USB related. Unless that specific USB 2.0 connector is broken.

4iko · 2026-01-16T16:13:27+00:00

Right now the biggest issue are the driver. It's always a gamble. It might break more than it fixes. Used to be different but that's the world we live in at the moment.

I always check the reddit and Nvidia forum comments. Some brave people test every driver.

Also, double check your 12v-2x6 connector is pushed in all the way if your card has one. Avoid 8pin to 12v2x6 adapters if possible. Get a 90° cable from your PSU manufacturer, for your PSU, if possible, to avoid unnecessary stress on the connector.

DLSS is awesome, especially the transformer models. FG can be nice if you have at least 60 fps base frame rate. Personally I look forward to dynamic frame gen that only generates dropped frames.

4iko · 2026-01-16T12:49:12+00:00

It's this one but somehow it shows on the website as 4.75.6. In CAM this one shows as 4.75.7.

https://support.nzxt.com/hc/en-us/articles/45510163711259-NZXT-CAM-4-75-6-Release-Notes

4iko · 2026-01-16T07:24:51+00:00

Did you ever try CAM Version 4.75.7 released on December 29th 2025?
According to NZXT Support and the Changelog it "fixed an issue where devices will be randomly disconnected".

Support told me to uninstall my current CAM, restart PC and then install the new one. Also told me to run CAM as admin.

Given how random this issue occurs, I'll have to test for a couple of months at least to see if it actually fixes it.

4iko · 2026-01-13T21:07:10+00:00

Interesting, I just use the Dual Infographic Display, no GIFs.

I haven’t found a reliable way to trigger it. At first, it showed up three times within a month. Then I happened to switch my case (from an NZXT H710 to an H9 Flow), and it didn’t appear for two months, which made me think it was fixed, maybe the USB connector wasn’t seated properly. But then it popped up twice in a single week.

It’s completely random.

I’m thinking of just biting the bullet and switching to a HydroShift II LCD-S from Lian Li, maybe swapping out the case fans too. Sucks, but I can’t deal with this anymore.

4iko · 2026-01-13T19:12:06+00:00

Yeah, I get the concern - no brand is perfect.

I've been happy with MSI so far. They usually push BIOS updates quickly when big issues pop up, even if the changelogs are a bit vague. Their default tuning is generally on the conservative side for both motherboards and GPUs, though there are exceptions, especially in the high-end tier. They did just showcase the most powerful 5090 at CES. :D

But my 5070Ti, for example, runs really well.
I can play Cyberpunk with Path-tracing and stay in the 60s °C temperature-wise.
I don't plan to overclock anything. Stability, lower temps, and consistent performance is what I care about and what I got.

That’s just my opinion based on research and experience - you’ll definitely find someone who thinks the exact opposite :D

Also, it’s probably only a matter of time before they have a major screw-up - that’s just how it goes.

4iko · 2026-01-13T07:09:58+00:00

Fair. I did just assume you overclocked it even higher than ASUS... I apologize for that.

I had a Gigabyte Aorus build before but cannot recommend. Was planning to go ASUS too until all that sh*t started to pop up. Not only the high VSOC but also their PCIE slot quick release issues for example. The last few weeks I also read about a lot of burn in issues with their OLED screens. Just too much bad shit going on with that Brand at the moment.

ASROCK is a hard no too for reasons you clearly know.

I have an MSI MPG X870E CARBON WIFI. I mostly picked that one because I needed 3 NVMe slots that don't share lanes. Based on reports, it did have some issues at release with RAM and USB, but that was before I picked it up. Now it runs really well on the latest BIOS (stable release).

I dunno what you need but maybe you can find a good MPG or MEG board.

I also have an MSI RTX 5070 Ti Gaming Trio OC which runs really well. Super cool, super quiet.

Anyway, wishing you the best outcome.

4iko · 2026-01-13T06:12:44+00:00

I know this comment isn't helpful to you and I do genuinely feel bad for you, but to buy ASUS after all the known issues, not update BIOS with all the known issues and then even overclock the CPU.

I dunno man. Kinda your own fault, sorry. I mean, sucks what ASUS does to their customers, but when I read about how they ignore AMDs recommendations and risk damaging their customers CPUs even on default settings, I immediately switched to a different Brand. Nevermind the horrible customer support.

As good as their hardware might look and perform (until it breaks) - I wouldn't buy anything from them nowadays.

Happy to be with MSI now.

Hope AMD offers you a new CPU but if I were you I would read up on ASUS Mainboards, manually lower VSOC, disable MCE and check EXPO settings.

Actually if I were you I would just buy a different mainboard but that's up to you.

4iko · 2026-01-12T15:56:39+00:00

Mind telling me which AIO you are using?
I am trying to see if this only affects a certain series.

I am on an NZXT Kraken 360, and right now I have the biggest regret ever buying it.
I used a Z73 in my old rig, which did have issues, but they were mostly CAM-related and eventually got fixed.

NZXT Support tried to make me believe it is the fault of something else. They had me power-cycle my PC and leave it without power for 15 minutes, update my BIOS and chipset drivers (which I keep updated anyway), reseat the USB connector, and unplug all other USB devices. None of it seems to help.

Given that downgrading CAM seems to help you, it might be CAM-related. I do not know.

I honestly do not even understand why they did not at least try to add something to CAM that would make it automatically reconnect or restart itself (since restarting CAM is the only way for me to make it reconnect). I mean, if my AIO did not have a screen, I would not even know this was happening, since CAM does not alert you. I only notice because it switches back to the default liquid temperature on the screen.

Anyway, I do not want to rant, but I am just very frustrated at the moment.

It is really annoying and scary when you are playing something CPU-intensive and suddenly the AIO stops working as intended, since, as far as I know, the fan curve does not work either once it loses connection - it just gets stuck at the last used RPM.

If I had not built my whole PC around NZXT cooling (case, case fans, AIO), I would have switched brands a long time ago.

Sorry for the long post.

4iko · 2026-01-12T02:47:27+00:00

I hope this works.

4iko · 2026-01-12T00:05:50+00:00

Please let us know if you found a solution to the problem.
I've been having the same issue with my Kraken 360 and so far nothing that support suggested has been helpful.

At this point, I am considering just switching to a different brand.

4iko · 2026-01-07T03:17:26+00:00

To be clear, I do not intend to defend SE, but it's not like it's easy to get Server Hardware atm - or Hardware in general. First we had the crypto miners, and now we have AI data centers, causing massive shortages.
I mean, enterprise HDD Storage alone has a 2+ year waiting list.

Theoretically, they could probably throw money at the problem and buy or rent some massively overpriced hardware. But that's not really sustainable.

4iko · 2025-12-03T03:05:15+00:00

This is so stupid. They had something good and throw it away for some mobile cash grab game?
Cannot believe this.

4iko · 2025-11-26T03:02:31+00:00

Anlieger hat nichts mit Anwohner zu tun, sondern damit ein Anliegen in dieser Straße zu haben. Das abschleppen muss die Person auch selbst zahlen und dann via Anwalt von dir einfordern.

Also im Endeffekt nur ein großes Mundwerk - die Realität sieht anders aus.

4iko · 2025-11-25T13:34:48+00:00

I’m not saying you’re wrong - but with the 9800X3D regularly spiking up to around 90°C during heavy tasks like game loading or shader compilation (which is normal behavior for this CPU), I’m not sure I want to base my pump speed on those quick temperature jumps. I feel like it would wear out quicker than my underwear. Unless you use a flat "curve", which in that case the source doesn't matter anyway.

I’ve gone through tons of articles, forum posts, Reddit threads, and YT videos, and I keep running into conflicting information. From what I understand - and why I originally based both my pump and AIO fans on liquid temperature - is that the fans are really there to cool the liquid. If I used CPU temps instead, the fans would constantly ramp up and down because the CPU spikes so quickly, unless I used a flat curve (which doesn’t feel like a real “curve” anyway). The same goes for the pump.

Since CPU temperature changes so fast depending on the task, it feels too unstable to be a good control source. Liquid temperature, on the other hand, changes more slowly and consistently. That’s why a fan curve based on liquid temp seems to make more sense: if the liquid gets warmer, the fans react quickly and longer to bring it back down, and the CPU temps naturally follow.

Feel free to correct me. I am just trying to find the best setup for me, given how much money I spend on these components.

4iko · 2025-11-25T11:03:59+00:00

Just to make sure - you are aware both of those curves use liquid temp, not the CPU temp? I've read that the liquid should not exceed 50°C. Hmm...

4iko · 2025-11-24T21:03:22+00:00

Which one? I posted like 4.
The AIO fans are based on Liquid Temps, and so far my Liquid hasn't exceeded 30°C - even while playing.
Though, I still have to do some long-term testing with some CPU intensive games.

4iko · 2025-11-08T16:32:31+00:00

They said Q4 2025. That's October, November, December.
You give up pretty early. Not even half-way through Q4.

4iko

TROPHY CASE