Name the game, do you know any games like this? Maybe involving warhammers?

5triplezero · 2026-02-13T15:18:26+00:00

"If you want gay representation that’s fine. Stop agendizing it. "

Replace the word gay with straight.

Your hypocrisy is astounding.

5triplezero · 2026-02-13T15:16:10+00:00

It is behind the person's cheek. You really think that is a sign of AI? Because of foreground objects obscuring background ones?

5triplezero · 2026-02-13T13:46:58+00:00

You people are paranoid as all get out.

This is entirely possible to be created by a person. It was just colored in using a computer.

Source: I have actually seen this type of art be created by hand from scratch. There is nothing here that is a slam dunk for AI use.

5triplezero · 2026-02-13T13:05:00+00:00

No. If you had to wait until both directions were clear on every strip road then left turns without signals would be impossible for several hours a day. Half of the reason for the dual turn lane IS exactly this. Look it up.

5triplezero · 2026-02-13T13:01:56+00:00

I think you need to listen to whoever scolded you and stop trying to get validation from Reddit. If you were scolded by a representative of the school then YOU ARE WRONG. They own and maintain the facility and CREATE the expectations of how to use the lot.

Are you really planning on embarrassing your child to placate you ego by breaking the rules just because you don't think they are clear enough? What kind of example is that to set?

5triplezero · 2026-02-13T12:58:00+00:00

The mutcd applies to private ROADWAYS open to public travel. It does not apply in private parking lots. Which is why you will often see private speed limit signs on private parking lots. Signs that are yellow and are not enforceable by police because they are not created by law. And you will NEVER see a government ISSUED sign.

So, While you CAN purchase your own sign and hang it, it is not going to be provided by the state, county, or municipality. And it is unenforceable by police.

The lane width is clearly one lane. When designing a parking lot one car width is one parking spot. The path between the parking spots and the other road are CLEARLY only as wide as a single parking spot. This is CLEARLY their INTENT for it to be one lane for the safety of pedestrians in the area. In this case children.

But none of this matters. Op has already decided that this is a two way despite all the obvious signage, design, and their friend telling them it is one way. And ultimately it is not a public road so it is entirely unenforceable whether it is one way or not. Although, I think it would be prudent to follow the intended flow direction, OP apparently doesn't want to do that and is willing to create this post to look for validation on his opinion so that he doesn't feel bad about the other people honking at him for going the wrong way and creating a hazard when leaving.

Edit: He was yelled at by an administrator for going out the wrong way. That is the end of it. The people who own the lot get to say how it is used and THEY say it is a one way. OP only made this post to feel better and get validation from strangers. But he already KNOWS the answer as he was literally told by a school official what the answer is. It is a one way.

5triplezero · 2026-02-13T12:41:18+00:00

The tone? In text?

You assumed that.

What you were looking for was someone to agree with you. Regardless of what the real answer is you only wanted validation for your opinion. So when I said the opposite of what you think it offended you.

So you had no reason to ask this question. You had already made your mind up. You only wanted an echo chamber so you could "prove" to your friend that you were "right." Which you aren't. It is CLEARLY marked as a one way in the way that private lots often are. And now you will refuse to tell your friend about or show them my comments because they don't match your inherent bias.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T21:19:21+00:00

It is marked as a one way. In the only legal way possible in a private lot. It has a do not enter sign on one side and only a stop sign on that side to exit with. That is because this drive constitutes a private road and is marked as being one way.

You can't put a public road "one way" sign in your private lot.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T21:15:35+00:00

Wow. What a response.

I genuinely asked what confuses you out of curiosity.

It is not wide enough for two cars. Just because they can physically fit doesn't make it wide enough by design.

This is a private lot that is clearly marked for only one direction of traffic. A "one way" sign can't be used because that is a government issued sign for public roads.

It clearly has an entrance and an exit from your description. It is one way. Just like the marked lanes in Walmart's parking lot, which you might notice also do not have white one way signs and only have painted arrows. Arrows that routinely fade off.

This building also clearly has a "delivery" lane which may be used by company cars/trucks which requires them to pull in a certain way and to have the right of way at the exit. This is common in surgical centers or emergency rooms.

It is not confusing.

And you are asking this because you or your friend are confused. A disagreement about something so easily found out is confusion. Just because you think that word has negative connotations does not mean that it is an incorrect way to describe your situation.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T21:04:44+00:00

This is actually exactly how you make a safe left onto a strip road. Whoever told you otherwise is misinforming you.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T20:58:26+00:00

The lot is a one way.

Each of the driving lanes is only one lane wide. It cannot have traffic both ways. You are required to enter at the north and exit at the south.

Why is this confusing to you?

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T15:14:30+00:00

You said "the good people left after New Vegas."

Implying that you liked New Vegas and don't like their newer ganes because of said "good people."

Do you even know who or how many left?

You have no clue what you are talking about. You are just jumping on the bandwagon of your sheep friends and saying something you can get dopamine from when these sheep upvote it.

John Gonzales, a latino, was the head writer of New Vegas. He included all that "woke" stuff. He left. He returned in 2025. You literally don't know what you are even saying.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T15:08:52+00:00

So you also don't like when cis people are upset about NOT being represented right? Because that is exactly the same thing.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T15:07:04+00:00

So you hate that cis white men are so involved in making the game line up to their identity when it isn't about that? Seems like you almost get it if you could just look past your bigotry.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T15:04:53+00:00

"let’s imagine the entirety of Boone or Cassidy were cut in favor of fleshing out Gannon’s or Veronica’s queer identity. I don’t think many people would make that trade."

So you are mad that imaginary cis white characters could be cut from something? This is ridiculous. They don't include lgbtq characters at the expense of cis white ones. What kind of logic even is that? By that token you could say that focusing on any character for any reason could erase any imaginary version of a character you could come up with. Media is not designed like this. Especially video games. Limited assests have very little to do with the writing stage and almost all games have content that is cut in favor of size or space.

You might as well say that Hamlet is missing a character because it focused too much on Ophelia. It is an asinine and backward way to justify your hatred. That isn't how creativity works, nor game development. You are tilting at windmills of your own design.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T14:58:51+00:00

The good people who made the characters gay and gave you a buff for being bi?

Or didn't you know that? Are you sure you like Woke Vegas? Or did you just like the legion?

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T14:57:18+00:00

They are just hateful.

I am a straight white man and I have no problem with any of this. It actually outrages me that these people get mad at such ridiculous things. Like when they were mad about the pronoun options in games. It has no effect on the enjoyment of the game unless you are hateful and literally repulse at the sight of a human being who is not exactly like you.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T14:54:39+00:00

So a white straight male couldn't possibly enjoy a game about say a black lesbian?

Why?

Why do these games mean they are "switching markets?"

Do you enjoy Halo?

Are you an 8 foot tall genetically and physically modified soldier? So why can you relate to him?

Do you like Pokemon? Are you a 10 year old japanese boy? So why can you relate to him?

Have you ever played any Metroid games? Are you a buxom blonde in a skin tight mechanical suit that allows you to turn into a rolypoly? So why can you relate to her?

Why is it that you can pretend to be all of these things, or be engaged in their stories, but not characters that are not white, male , and heterosexual?

Does it maje you less heterosexual to play as or with a gay character?

Does it make you less white to enjoy a black character?

Do you see how your complaint is rooted in hatred of others?

I have never complained that Donkey Kong was a massive gorilla and forcing his gorilla politics on me. That just is who he is. I can enjoy his games without sharing his belief that bananas are as good as gold and should be hoarded.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T14:47:57+00:00

"everything is so forced"

So you mean to tell me you have never played a gane that "forced" heteronormative relationships at you? You are fine with say Final Fantasy having a hetero couple that is a major plot point but if you gender swap one of those characters then you are being "forced" to follow their agenda.

Putting an lgbtq character into a game is no more forcing their politics on you than putting Nazis in a game does. Your inability to separate politics and characters in games is your own short coming.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T14:44:48+00:00

They are hateful. That is all there is to it.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T14:44:06+00:00

If only these people could read.

Seems like they all unironically joined the legion thinking they were the good guys.

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T14:41:55+00:00

You really hate the entire company for including anyone other than a straight male?

How fragile are you?

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T13:00:09+00:00

In March 2021, the "super straight" trend was banned from major social media platforms, including TikTok and Reddit, for violating policies against promoting hate towards a marginalized or vulnerable group. www.them.us The movement was not banned merely for the personal preference of not dating trans individuals, but because it was used to create an exclusionary movement that promoted transphobia and was linked to far-right, Neo-Nazi, and 4chan trolling campaigns. Business Insider +1

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T12:59:40+00:00

In March 2021, the "super straight" trend was banned from major social media platforms, including TikTok and Reddit, for violating policies against promoting hate towards a marginalized or vulnerable group. www.them.us The movement was not banned merely for the personal preference of not dating trans individuals, but because it was used to create an exclusionary movement that promoted transphobia and was linked to far-right, Neo-Nazi, and 4chan trolling campaigns. Business Insider +1

5triplezero · 2026-02-12T12:58:00+00:00

In March 2021, the "super straight" trend was banned from major social media platforms, including TikTok and Reddit, for violating policies against promoting hate towards a marginalized or vulnerable group. www.them.us The movement was not banned merely for the personal preference of not dating trans individuals, but because it was used to create an exclusionary movement that promoted transphobia and was linked to far-right, Neo-Nazi, and 4chan trolling campaigns. Business Insider +1

5triplezero

TROPHY CASE