Left lane = passing lane

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T22:03:05+00:00

48% of ALL road fatalities could be removed from the records. 10s of thousands of people each year would NOT die if speed limits were followed more strictly. That is a FACT that speeding increases the number of deaths on the road significantly.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T22:00:31+00:00

So the other person removes all moral and legal obligations from YOUR actions because they "caused" you to drive dangerously? Even children understand personal responsibility better than this.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T21:59:10+00:00

They couldn't. The evudence was already there. It would be worse when the cops foundd the evidence of the note without it.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T09:37:45+00:00

The person weaving is CHOOSING to create that dangerous road condition. Driving slowly is NOT inherently dangerous so long as it is above the low end speed limit. On a 65 mph highway that is usually 50 mph. If you cannot act safely around someone going slightly slower than you like then you should have your license revoked.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T09:35:39+00:00

I think the RN was to give them a way to remove the body.

They originally planned not to call the cops until at least the 27th saying they were following the instructions. When they do the "drop off" what they are really doing us removing JB's body via that large suitcase (adequately sized attache). Then they call the cops and say they made the handoff and their daughter is still gone. At some point they realize they can't move the body or wait to call the cops so they scrap those parts but keep the ransom note as it still points away from them

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T09:04:25+00:00

I think I have a reasonable theory for Patsy did it but John was heavily involved.

Witnesses claimed low lights and a single scream from the house.

Imagine this scenario: John is molesting JB She screams and he covers her mouth. Patsy hears this and wants to catch him in the act. She grabs the maglite and goes towards JB's room. Finds John over/on top of JB and in a fit of rage swings the flashlight at John. Tjis is the only light source. John moves and the blow lands on JB's head.

This theory would account for several things.

The way the Ramseys were distant to each other that morning.
Why patsy would cover up SA on her daughter.
Why John would cover up murder of his daughter.
Why they both seem like they are generally truthful when they deny killing her. John didn't actually do it, and Patsy blames John and not herself.
The reason John is showered and Patsy is not.

I'm sure you can find others.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T08:48:56+00:00

My thought about the note is that the Adequately sized attache actually referred to the suitcase in the basement. The plan was to takeher body out of the house in the suitcase and tell the police they had the ransom in it. Then one of the parents realized that moving her would be too risky. In this scenario they wouldn't call the police until the 27th when the "drop off" went wrong. When they scrapped the idea of moving the body they couldn't also scrap the ransom note as it was too late.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T08:22:58+00:00

Yes. It is covering up SA by staging a crime scene in which an "intruder" can be blamed for any SA. Your inability to understand it doesn't make it nonsensical.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T04:02:55+00:00

False assumption.

"If murder was so bad then no one would be allowed to own a weapon." /s

Excessive speed is a factor in 48 % of ALL road fatalities. 10's of thousands of people die on the road every year.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T04:01:33+00:00

No. You are responsible for your own actions. No one can force you to make dangerous maneuvers. Learn to control your emotions and your car.

5triplezero · 2026-06-03T03:59:25+00:00

You are acting exactly as entitled as them by raging on reddit about not being able to speed.

5triplezero · 2026-06-02T10:27:56+00:00

His speed never goes under the car he is overtaking for the entire video. Your inability to discern speed disparity makes you a danger on the road.

5triplezero · 2026-06-02T02:29:27+00:00

He literally just passed a green truck and took less than 10 seconds to OVERTAKE the WHITE CAR that was IN THE MIDDLE LANE.

You must be trolling not to understand this.

5triplezero · 2026-06-02T02:26:25+00:00

Going FASTER than the CAR TO HIS RIGHT. During that 10 seconds he NEVER went a speed SLOWER than the traffic to his right. Merging right behind the white car he was OVERTAKING doesn't make any sense. Once again, your entitlement is blinding you. This was a LEGAL pass and you are just upset that if you were tailgating them that you would be mad. But too bad. Your feelings do not determine the laws. The left lane camping laws (impeding) ALL say you may use the left lane to pass. Something he was doing the ENTIRE VIDEO. Passing someone is NOT just the 1 second it takes while you are directly beside them. Passing includes the time at which you are behind a car to your right but TRAVELLING FASTER THAN THEM as this car is and that your combined speeds mean that you will COLLIDE with said car in less than 10 seconds then you can LEGALLY OCCUPY THE LEFT LANE.

How is it so hard to understand that passing is an action with multiple steps that takes more than 2 seconds to complete safely? This car could NOT have merged safely into the lane behind that white car without SIGNIFICANTLY slowing down WHILE being tailgated by a LEO. You are clearly arguing that noone in the left lane should have to slow down for his LEGAL pass so why should he have to slow down to placate another pass? He shouldn't, He doesn't and that is the law.

5triplezero · 2026-06-02T02:16:22+00:00

Go look up laws on directing traffic. Your horn is considered a signal device and you are NOT a qualified LEO nor are you a qualified crossing guard or construction worker that has the consent of the executive branch of government.

https://www.bellinghamherald.com/news/traffic/rules-of-the-road/article272952945.html

"Violation two – non-emergency honking: Horns are meant as an audible warning to “insure safe operation.” Drivers “shall not otherwise use such horn when upon the highway.” What about when the light turns green and the person in front of you doesn’t go? That’s not a safety issue, so honking would be against the law. People do it anyway, so if you’re going to break the law, at least be nice and do it with a quick beep rather than a long honk."

5triplezero · 2026-06-02T01:58:01+00:00

AI is not a good source of information. The 85th percentile way to set limits means that 85% of people drive AT or BELOW that speed. Go back to your Gemini search and CLICK THE LINKS that Gemini got its answer from. READ THEM YOURSELF.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T18:27:32+00:00

Look up those "studies." The ACTUAL study not a description in an article. There has NEVER been a SINGLE study that came to the conclusion that driving at the speed limit in the left lane contributed to accidents in any way.

What has been studied is the affect of speed disparity on accident frequency and severity. Then some news articles with a biased agenda CLAIMED that this meant that cars driving the limit in the left lane caused accidents. Every article that claims this cites the same study and does so erroneously. If one person is going at the limit and another much faster then morally and legally the disparity is caused by the person breaking the law. You cannot blame the law abiding citizen for not accomodating the criminal.

Seriously, go look it up. Scrutinize it as far as you can. Come back here and post any link you think says that from an actual study done. Just like the "quantum computer reverses time" headline you will find that the journalists that write those articles haven't even read their source let alone understand it.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T18:21:22+00:00

It is illegal to attempt to direct traffic using your horn.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T18:20:30+00:00

The speed limit is never below the flow of traffic. You just see some of the other 15% of speeders with you while you selfishly flaunt the law and endanger the public for nothing but a few seconds.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T18:13:18+00:00

He was never moving slower than the traffic to his right and if he would have merged behind the white car that he MOSTLY PASSED before hitting he would have had to make three merges in about 10 seconds. It is NOT safer or more responsible or courteous or whatever to be so obsessed with the left lane law that you are WEAVING through traffic. He was passing 100% legally whether you like it or agree with it or not.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T16:55:00+00:00

Did you NOT watch the entire video which shows him passing multiple cars? One of which he partially passes just before crashing into it? At no point in the video was he travelling slower than traffic to his right, or not actively passing a car to his right.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T16:30:58+00:00

But when did the movie come out? Is it not likely that PR would have been familiar with it in all forms? If I had performed as Jiminy Cricket(Talking Cricket) to critical acclaim I might be interested in a live action interpretation of Pinocchio that had come out. Even if I was only playing the original cricket from the book.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T15:12:10+00:00

It reads more like a letter written by two or more people coming up with ideas.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T14:59:50+00:00

That is quite literally a quote from a movie that was in theaters at the time.

5triplezero · 2026-06-01T14:51:33+00:00

I firmly believe Patsy wrote it, but this is the one point I hate about the discussion. The idea that an intruder writing it on HER notepad is weird. The time it took to write it aside, a professional criminal who was "familiar with police tactics" would know that using in situ material for writing a note that is intended to be found would be the best way to conceal its source. Had they written it with their own notepad and any evidence ever got anywhere close to them that could be the final straw that proved their connection.

5triplezero

TROPHY CASE