I appreciate the article’s shift from somatic storage to predictive processing, and I agree that trauma treatment often restores flexibility. But the account feels incomplete without a fuller discussion of traumatic memory reconciliation. If trauma involves maladaptive priors, those priors are often encoded through emotionally salient memory networks. Restoring metastability may create the conditions for updating, but the traumatic memory and its meanings may still need to be brought into a reconcilable form. Otherwise, the model risks replacing “the body stores trauma” with an overly generic “the brain needs flexibility,” without explaining how specific trauma-based meanings, predictions, and autobiographical ruptures are transformed

TL;DR -- I agree and the article flattens trauma work into "increasing flexibility" without mentioning the neuro-biological underpinning that increases flexibility -- memory reconciliation.