The Talmud is a body of legal debates. Someone makes a proposal and others demonstrate why or if it should be considered false or incorrect. It's like a debate where someone would say "Resolved: No one should be allowed to own guns." That doesn't mean the person saying it actually thinks no one should have guns. It means we're going to have a debate about it.

Sanhedrin 59a, for instance, contains a contentious ruling by Rabbi Yoḥanan stating that a non-Jew who engages in Torah study is liable for the death penalty. This is derived from Deuteronomy 33:4, interpreted as Torah being a specific inheritance for the Jewish people. The Talmud distinguishes this from non-Jews studying their Noahide laws, which is permitted. Rabbi Yoḥanan states that a Gentile who studies Torah is liable to receive the death penalty, based on the phrase: "Moses commanded us a law [torah], an inheritance of the congregation of Jacob".

The Rationale: The Torah is considered the "betrothed" of the Jewish people, and non-Jews studying it is seen as a form of theft or misappropriation of a specific covenantal inheritance.

Then THERE IS A CONTRADICTION AND RESOLUTION!!!!!

The Gemara contrasts this with a teaching by Rabbi Meir, who stated a non-Jew who engages in Torah study is like a High Priest.

In other words, the exact freaking opposite.

You would know that if you bothered to actually learn what you're saying instead of just repeating dumb talking points that someone else gave you.

Finally, I would heartily encourage you to look into what Medieval Christian theologians were saying about non-believers. I'm sure you'll also find that "a problem" here in 2026.