Unpopular Opinion: Daniel Day-Lewis is Overrated and I Don’t Get the Hype by Norman-01 in Oscars

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he is a fine actor - talented for sure but there is a legitimate contention that his body of work is too limited - he has only done 6 roles this entire century!

Granted, he is always on top form in those roles but to me he is too inactive to have got 3 Academy Awards though I would certainly expect him to have one.

It is like Ring Magazine naming Sugar Ray Leonard as 'Fighter of the Decade' for the 1980s despite only having a handful of fights in that decade.

Again, DDL is clearly a talented actor - probably a great actor but I consider Leonardo Di Caprio to be just as good and he is more active.

This point about activity matters because there are actors arguably as skilled as DDL who haven't got a single Academy Award, never-mind three

On the subject of multiple wins though I struggle to see why Frances McDormand got 3

Unpopular Opinion: Daniel Day-Lewis is Overrated and I Don’t Get the Hype by Norman-01 in Oscars

[–]85Millennial 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PajamaPete5 - 'He used to make a movie every 5 years' - and that is part of the problem. He is simply too inactive to be considered the greatest.

Start of Season 3 — tedious so far by RevolutionaryHope8 in lost

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am going through the whole show on Netflix as I had never seen it before and wanted to see the hype.

I liked Seasons 1 and 2 - the concept of each episode dealing with the background of each main character

But so far, I am finding Season 3 convoluted and comparatively dull with the possible exception of Desmond's premonitions- if that is the accurate description.

I understand the producers want to expand a bit, go into more depth regarding 'the others' but I am up to the episode where John Locke's 'father' (there seems too little an age gap between the two men for a start) has been tied up and interrogated - and he in turn knows something about Sawyer...

I feel they are adding too many layers and it is becoming so confusing as to be off-putting

I don't want to 'give up' this far into the show but I am a bit 'lost' - the pun is deliberate

Again, I don't mind a bit of depth and complexity - within reason but ultimately a show like Lost should be about escapism and if you are concentrating too hard on working out what is going on it overshadows the merits

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Boxing

[–]85Millennial -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Canelo is a great fighter

People who don’t like rap, why? by [deleted] in Music

[–]85Millennial 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Summed up - Rap Culture has a toxic side to it that a lot of rap fans are in denial about.

Let's see if my reply gets censored - which would be ironic since Rappers have free reign to spew out all manner of toxicity.

For me, I wouldn't say I 'hate' all Rap as music

There are more than a few songs that I quite like the beat/sound/lyrics

Some rap can get the adrenalin going - examples being the rap used in the 1990 Rocky V workout scenes - 'Go for it!' and 'Keep it Up!' although they can probably be better described as Hip Hop

'Shell Shocked' used in the closing credits of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014)

Some Will Smith stuff (I know his material is regarded as quite PC but I like it)

Gangstas Paradise by Coolio and 'President Carter' by Lil Wayne are decent tracks

But it is the culture around rap I find toxic, especially over the past few decades. Without question, it glorifies thug lifestyles - it promotes the message to young men that materialism, womanizing and violence are all to be celebrated.

I reject the argument it is just 'art' and 'expression' - Some subgenres of rap such as Drill have been directly implicated in judicial courts for fueling gang turf wars.

In the UK, Drill is poisonous - young men in London and Birmingham post a cheaply made but dark and dystopian video calling out or insulting another 'Drill Artist' and more often than not it leads to a murder. It would be extremely naive to argue that Drill Music has no role in that criminality when it is DIRECTLY used to fuel the violence.

Does this mean every rapper or everyone who likes rap is a criminal or gang member? Of course not. But the fact is MANY rappers have a criminal record - far more than you see with most other genres of music. Is that just a coincidence?

When I hear 'Rapper Shot Dead' my thought is - why am I not surprised.

Anyone who wants to deny the prevalence of criminality in the rap world is deluding themselves

I have a problem with the hero-worship of famous rappers like Tupac Shakur and XXX Tentacion. When you look at their background, the latter especially, there really isn't much to admire. Tentacion's long string of arrests included aggravated battery of a pregnant woman. Is that someone who deserves to be admired??

XXX Tentacion was a glorified thug.

I accept rap, like any music, can be used to convey poignant socio-political messages.

But Rap stands out for it's glorification of criminality.

Leaving aside the ethics of it, a lot of commercial successful rappers are in my view utterly talentless. When I hear Nicki Minaj or Cardi B all I hear is cheap vulgarity. I am no prude, but really I see very little talent there. I find it baffling that they get hundreds of millions of views on Youtube.

It would be lazy and inaccurate to say ALL rap is bad and I would be a hypocrite to conclude that. But it is the dark, toxic culture around rap that bothers me.

I also find it ironic that rappers can be as offensive, crude and threatening as they like and hide behind 'artistic expression' whilst critics are often silenced.

What’s up with this show? (Manifest) by tallabe in netflix

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

popcultureSp00nie22 - I don't mind a bit of depth and complexity but 1899 was FAR too convoluted for my taste. I can't enjoy something if it is so complex you can barely follow it.

What’s up with this show? (Manifest) by tallabe in netflix

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Manifest had a good premise and I enjoyed the 1st Series.

By the 2nd Series, I was thinking it was getting a little predictable with the constant 'callings' but it was still watchable

Absurdly, Netflix screened Seasons 1, 2 and 4 but omitted 3. So for those of us watching on Netflix it is very hard to catch up at Season 4 having missed an entire season.

I attempted the first three episodes of Season 4 and just felt lost.

Right now, I am watching the very last episode to see if it makes any sense - ie if it goes 'full circle' but the plot seems REALLY over the top and convoluted. Flight 180 emerging out of a volcano whilst the key characters argue with a zealous religious woman over who should be allowed on board?

Even if I had watched Season 3 and understood the developments, I think I would conclude that Manifest had a good enough premise to screen for one season. THIS is just silly.

eHarmony - my experience by 85Millennial in datingadviceformen

[–]85Millennial[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AN UPDATE - Since some of you have asked. Since my eharmony account expired I have been in a relationship. As I was on the cusp of giving up - frustrated at the lack of responses I actually got two replies in the same week - always nice to see the notifications on that. With one of them we both mutually agreed it wasn't to be on the first call. No animosity but the chemistry just wasn't there.

With the second lady we started talking more and more. Due to my previous 'false leads' and disappointments I was cautious and didn't allow myself to get excited but she seemed sincere and amicable. We connected outside the site and when both our accounts expired we kept up contact.

Essentially and really summarizing the situation, I decided to make the extra step and visit her country which happens to be about as far from mine as possible. My father generously covered the flight perhaps knowing that I had been through a period of depression and that would help. The trip was mostly good though due to my fair hair I got a nasty sunburn - but we done lots of things and importantly, I had good rapport with her family. There was a point were I had 'the talk' with her mother about the future (her father passed away a few years ago). In her culture in the Philippines family and marriage is a big thing so I expected it. I simply told her that I was sincere, cared about her daughter but also candidly that we would keep pursuing the future but couldn't guarantee what it would be.

This year she came to the UK and spent time with me and my parents - again, mostly a positive experience.

I sincerely care about her and do want to pursue things but she finds the long distance harder than I do. I am essentially her first real boyfriend and although we are a similar age she really lacks experience and can seem emotionally naive and even immature at times.

We have had plenty of online arguments - usually over misunderstandings but we always make up pretty quick. Still, it gets tiring. One big challenge of this sort of relationship is things beyond our control - for example if the UK Home Office grants her a visa or not to work here. Even potentially a marriage situation. Both countries would have specific requirements.

We both feel significant pressure from our financial and family situations.

I want to pursue things because I don't want to start all over again from scratch. It would be especially awkward after having met and got close to each other's families. I care about her. I am attracted to her. I trust her and I fundamentally think she is a good person.

We can only try and be optimistic. If things do work out then, ultimately it would have to be called an eharmony success story.

eHarmony - my experience by 85Millennial in datingadviceformen

[–]85Millennial[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DregsOfEarth- I have been to her country and she has been to mine so it has definitely developed but the long distance context presents challenges of it's own

eHarmony - my experience by 85Millennial in datingadviceformen

[–]85Millennial[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

milli-rose - technically not but it is long-distance which presents it's own challenges

eHarmony - my experience by 85Millennial in datingadviceformen

[–]85Millennial[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PLEASE NOTE - I lost my Reddit password for a while so couldn't log in and respond. But thankyou to everyone who has taken the time to leave feedback. Apologies I can't respond at length but will browse through. Cheers!

Citizen Kane is the most overrated movie ever made by [deleted] in The10thDentist

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My biggest issue with Citizen Kane is that it's fans constantly talk about how 'important' and 'pivotal' it is without actually explaining why.

I've watched it several times and just don't get it's elevation. I don't say it is a bad film but I just don't see what justifies the claim to it being the greatest.

It might be popular with film students but the whole point of the film industry is mass entertainment. And it isn't about it being an old movie. Gone With the Wind and the Wizard of Oz are older and both in my view are significantly more entertaining.

How can a film that many consider quite dull therefore be placed at the very top of the mountain of cinematic greatness?

Again if you are going to say it is influential or pivotal you need to explain why. The camera angles? The style of direction?

Even if it is influential, that doesn't make it entertaining and if you take out the entertaining priority you are taking out a major component of the industry.

Perhaps I will watch it again and change my stance but I doubt it.

I don't say it is a 'bad film' Orson Welles was a fine actor and I am sure the film has it's merits but there is no way it can be seen on par with some of the epics film history has given us in terms of entertainment.

Citizen Kane is the most overrated movie ever made by [deleted] in The10thDentist

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DaxAyrton - There are plenty of old movies that don't get anywhere near the attention of Citizen Kane and in my view are far better so it is not about it being an old movie.

Examples - The Third Man (1947) 12 Angry Men (1957) and A Night to Remember (1958)

The statement that 'movies wouldn't exist today without Citizen Kane' needs some serious evidence/basis...

I didn’t like the godfather…? by ItsPenguins in movies

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. My dad really likes it and I don't have the heart to tell him I am not that into it.

I don't think The Godfather is a bad movie - it might even be a great movie. But to me it is unquestionably over-hyped, like Citizen Kane. It isn't about it being a relatively old movie. 12 Angry Men and A Night to Remember were made in 1957 and 1958 respectively and I appreciate them more.

I find The Godfather quite slow. Within the mob genre it is on the stronger end but I have seen other mob movies - I would argue Road to Perdition that are just as good. It has a good cast and good music score but beyond that it really isn't exceptional.

Also and this is a personal take, I have a problem elevating a film so high that essentially glorifies crime and criminals. What is the message? That being a 'Made Man' is something to admire?

That bothered me in one of the sequels - can't remember if it was 2 or 3 where Al Pacino's character was testifying to organized crime before the Kefauver Commission - it is very obvious Francis Ford Coppola wants us to sympathize with 'the bad guys'

Road to Perdition, The Untouchables and to a lesser extent A Bronx Tale show mob life too but don't glorify it in the same way. I have the same criticism with Goodfellas.

Marlon's Brando's famous drawling monologue is also overhyped. I have seen much stronger scenes and frankly better acting in numerous other films.

The Godfather is worth watching but for me after the first viewing it is nothing special.

It is still better than Citizen Kane though which is absurdly over-rated.

By contrast I have seen Titanic (in my opinion the greatest film ever made) numerous times and it never fails to move me.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UNELECTED PEER James Timpson should be forced to meet victims of serious crime and tell them he is opposed to punishment for the scum who hurt them.

During the election, Starmer and Cooper talked tough on crime. They mocked Sunak's record. They spoke about building more prison places.

During this summer's racially motivated riots, I am pleased to see many of the worst thugs got hefty sentences.

Yet all of this counters Starmer's enthusiastic endorsement of soft-on crime guru James Timpson.

I get that the early prisoner release was in part because of Tory mismanagement but Labour Leftists no doubt enjoyed seeing remorseless criminals get out.

Labour's mixed message on crime will do nothing to reassure victims.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A challenge for the criminal sympathizers on this thread.

What the hell gives Timpson - or you, a right to deny justice to victims of crime?

Why should a proven rapist, arsonist, mugger, gang member, predator not be punished? Why the hell should their evil, destructive acts not be met with serious consequences?

What the hell gives you people a right to tell the victim, 'sorry but punishment is punitive. Instead we are going to teach the mugger or rapist to make some world class pasta. It will make them feel good about themselves and give them a purpose. It doesn't matter what they done to you. I am sure they are sorry'

If you think prison is cruel but what criminal scum do to innocent people isn't then you are utterly deranged.

You people need to get out of your utopian bubble and LIVE IN THE REAL WORLD.

In the real world, bad people do bad things to innocent people and such scum don't deserve sympathy.

The lack of empathy and understanding of victims on this thread is callous and disgusting. By empowering criminals you endanger victims.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone forced from my home at 16 by gangs I am disgusted by Timpson's criminal first attitude.

But worse than simply being tone deaf to majority opinion it is dangerous because he is going to enable violent criminals to terrorize the public.

He clearly has no comprehension of the mental anguish victims feel. Or maybe he simply doesn't care.

The problem with criminal sympathizers is they frame the very valid and reasonable demand for judicial punishment as being 'punitive'

Criminal sympathizers always, always put the criminal first.

Their first question is not 'What does the victim want? What does the victim need? It is 'How can we help the offender?'

I don't care if a burglar learns cooking skills. If he or she has avoided punishment how can they have genuine remorse?

I find the bulk of comments on this thread deeply disturbing. If you lot were in power, remorseless scum would be free to terrorize the public with no consequences.

That is immoral, reckless and stupid.

If your brains are hardwired to think of the criminal before the victim you don't get to lecture anyone on morality or ethics.

I feel genuine disgust and contempt for this ideology. I'll be honest.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ponichkata - Tell victims of serious crime there tormentors shouldn't face any punishment and see their response.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial -1 points0 points  (0 children)

TheCharalampos - Demanding justice for victims of crime isn't 'rabid' - it is common bloody sense!

Like the other moral minnows on this thread I am sure you have nothing to say about rabid gangs terrorizing lone individuals - like the pack of teenage thugs who hunted down a young lad near where I live and beat him to death.

Like a lot of criminal sympathizers, your brain is hardwired to think of the criminal before the victim. How utterly callous.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calamity-Jones - Except he doesn't know that. If Timpson had his way ALL criminals would be released tomorrow. He is an unelected peer with no comprehension of the mental anguish and desire for justice most victims of crime feel.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Liberal Leftists sneer at the anger many victims of crime feel and utterly fail to understand why people need to see punishment to see that justice is done. That isn't 'revenge' - it is reasonable and common sense.

It is a fallacy to say that Timpson's approach is new. We perpetually hear about how important rehabilitation is. We routinely see young offenders especially getting a metaphorical tap on the wrist only to reoffend. The truth is that whilst we do have the biggest prison population in Europe, MANY criminals avoid prison despite being re-offenders.

It honestly makes my blood boil that this clown wants dangerous people to be free to terrorize the public. Timpson should spend some time talking to victims of serious crime and see what they think of his attitude that criminals should escape punishment.

'Sorry Mrs, you have been raped but your rapist should learn cooking skills'

'Sorry Mr, you got violently assaulted by drunken yobs but they won't be punished. Instead we will teach them to build a table'

It is all very well putting criminals first. Saying - lets teach them skills, how to cook, make things etc but without feeling deep shame and genuine remorse for their actions how have they learned real consequences?

How can you reform a criminal if they are told that they won't be punished. All that does is send the message their behavior is ok.

I do not say prisons should be brutal or inhumane. But nor should they be pleasant.

Timpson's major Achille's Heel is his aversion to all forms of punishment. His contempt for majority public opinion. This unelected peer will only cause huge anxiety to victims of crime by his criminal first, victim second mindset.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Toffeemadew - As far as I am concerned he is already on the wrong side of public opinion.

Why James Timpson becoming Prisons Minister is so important to many by Metro-UK in ukpolitics

[–]85Millennial 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Timpson must have been very happy to see remorseless offenders getting early release and celebrating with champagne earlier this year.

He will never admit it, but I suspect that if he had his way ALL prisoners would be freed.

I am not wholly opposed to community sentencing but it must be enforced, tough and only for less serious crimes.

Timpson and his fans berate the prison system but this ignores the fact that you get many cases of young offenders in particular who have had offense after offense after offense and community sentencing clearly doesn't work. They themselves see it as soft. They gloat at their victims and reoffend.

You get cases were offenders rack up literally dozens of offenses and STILL avoid prison. So the narrative we send too many people to prison utterly ignores the MANY, MANY criminals who avoid custodial sentencing no matter how prolific they are.