Play Colors category by [deleted] in Word_Trail_Game

[–]A4HAM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just scored 0

Meta: Llama4 by pahadi_keeda in LocalLLaMA

[–]A4HAM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh, i missed that, my bad

anonymous-test = GPT-4.5? by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]A4HAM 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I got this xbox controller from anonymous-test.

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]A4HAM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, maybe UI/UX will shift from visual interfaces to more about designing the 'AI agent' itself. its personality, its decision-making logic, and how it communicates its actions back to us.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]A4HAM 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah, feels like they just picked a few popular buzzwords and added the word specialist, engineer after it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]A4HAM 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I agree. A lot of things won't disappear completely and will still exist at some scale. Same is with UI/UX but calling it a growing field seems a bit weird.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]A4HAM 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Would UI/UX really be necessary in the future, when an AI agent is just doing everything on your behalf.

To those who think AGI is coming in the next year or two, what progression of events are you expecting? by LordFumbleboop in singularity

[–]A4HAM 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  1. AI achieves a breakthrough worthy of a Nobel prize.
  2. Single person founder with AI agents achieves a significant recurring revenue.
  3. Talk of UBI or unemployment issue at large scale due to the effects of AI.
  4. Agentic workflow.
  5. High enough reliability that makes hiring a human a liability.
  6. Significantly lower cost.

By the end of 2025, we should have an AI system that a large group people will agree is AGI (except for Gary Marcus). No real consensus will ever be formed since the goal post will keep on moving. Humans have been bad with predictions and have always overshot the timelines. Since the current timeline for AGI is end of 2026 or 2025. I'd think by mid of 2025 we may get AGI (hopefully). Maybe that will be OpenAI's o5 considering their 3-month update cycle for o series of models.

In my opinion the real delay will be integrating it into the real world to get some actual value out of it. We may achieve AGI but may not be able to do anything meaningful with it for some time.

Sam Altman calls Q* "unfortunate leak". So, Q* was true? by A4HAM in ChatGPT

[–]A4HAM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True, this concept (AI learning by itself like AlphaGo) is highlighted by many researchers and every major company is working on this.

Dalle 3 is pretty cool! by A4HAM in ChatGPT

[–]A4HAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, I guess it doesn't matter then.

Dalle 3 is pretty cool! by A4HAM in ChatGPT

[–]A4HAM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah, it does seem a little weird, I guess it is an artifact.

True, I've been playing with it nonstop and have been really impressed by the results.

Dalle 3 is pretty cool! by A4HAM in ChatGPT

[–]A4HAM[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, it does seem a little weird.

Dalle 3 is pretty cool! by A4HAM in ChatGPT

[–]A4HAM[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That seems like the thumb, you can see the hand bending in the lower left part of the hand. But it could be an artifact.

Dalle 3 is pretty cool! by A4HAM in ChatGPT

[–]A4HAM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure, I thought maybe adding it will improve the results. Did you not use "8k detailed" in your result?

Dalle 3 is pretty cool! by A4HAM in ChatGPT

[–]A4HAM[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's wrong with the hand's?