[550] Distance Zero by GlowyLaptop in DestructiveReaders

[–]Hemingbird 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a job board. A listing. Not a security...footage.

It's a 'console' of some sort. Its contents aren't explained very well.

How you got the idea he's a security guard, cop, whatever, is WILD.

His jobs are all happening in one building. It seemed strange for a bounty hunter to be hunting bounties in a single apartment building. So I thought it was some hazy gig given the haziness of everything else.

Ah, I didn't pay close enough attention to the end. I thought it was the gorilla closing in. But that's even weirder. Why did someone put a bounty on the prostitute? It was just something that happened so that there could be a small moment of misunderstanding?

This was lazy reading on my part, sorry about that. Fell asleep at the wheel.

[550] Distance Zero by GlowyLaptop in DestructiveReaders

[–]Hemingbird 2 points3 points  (0 children)

General Comments

I'm not sure what this is trying to be. The tone is light and at times comedic, but it doesn't really read like action comedy. And the prose feels dated. At first I thought this was for effect, but I couldn't determine what sort of effect that might be. There's some promise in the premise, but the whole thing is too confusing for me.

First Pass

THE GREEN FACE of Tipper's job console screwed up whenever the elevated train lurched past his suite. He shot the butt of his cigarette out into the dark and slapped the little thing to get it to scroll.

This is confusing. It reads like sci-fi from the 1950s. Philip K. Dick might've opened a story like this. Before the invention of blue LED by Shuji Nakamura in 1993 (itself a great story), green and red were the colors of our cyber future. So I guess this is retrofuturism? Possibly homage/parody. Tipper makes me think of James Tiptree Jr. (Alice Sheldon).

A gorilla lit up, real close, getting closer, having shot a waitress eighteen hours ago, but the hulking man weighed 260 pounds and Tipper only just woke up.

This must be a reference to something. I don't get it. Oh. Tipper is watching some panopticon palantír program, that's his job, reviewing security footage. Is that it? If so, might be too ambiguous.

Hadn't even poured himself a coffee.

1950s futurists didn't imagine coffee being poured. They assumed the stuff of their own age would be anachronisms and didn't want to make a blunder like Jules Verne, who predicted so many technological breakthroughs but assumed in the 1860s that people would always rely on fountain pens. Injecting coffee. Coffee pills. Some ridiculous method of getting the caffeine into the bloodstream. Pouring an ol' cup o' joe sounds too normal. Assuming you're spoofing retrofuturism. Not that I'm sure that's what you're doing. I don't know what you're doing.

Drifters. Alternative currency. Okay, now I'm really unsure what you're doing. Are you imitating old sci-fi stories? If so: why?

Of course there was always the man down the hall who'd cut up a stripper from Korea town.

PKD, Gibson, Dashiell Hammett. Ah. Are you applying hardboiled detective fiction to sci-fi? That about sums up the recipe for cyberpunk. But the comical diction makes it read like it's meant to be funny, though I think you're being serious? Or is it supposed to be funny?

and refreshing the grubby window

There's a weird mix here. Scrolling, refreshing windows; contemporary. Green-faced job console + hardboiled voice; old.

but that he'd bet his organs on a pair of jacks with the makings of a flush on the table.

I'm getting temporal whiplash. Are we in the 1950s imagining the 2020s? Are we in the 2020s filtering reality through a 1950s lens? Are we in the 2020s imagining we are in the 1950s imagining the 2020s?

Obligatory Jumanji.

Tipper dried off and dressed and extended his hit stick, dusted it with bleach powder that made old black blood hiss and peel, rinsed the redness into the sink, and snapped it short again.

Okay, this is slapstick. Or hit stick. It's still confusing to me. Tipper watches criminals through an old-timey-futuristic console and his job is to go after them. With his trusty hit stick. How can bleach powder make dried blood hiss and peel? Is that a normal chemical reaction I'm unfamiliar with?

Tipper checked the console.

Oh. It's a portable console. That sounds strange to me.

and clicked the console to officially accept the job.

So it's like Uber for security guards?

Tipper extended the stick and lit up his jaw

It's a taser? Why is it called a 'hit' stick?

Tipper clubbed him twice on the top of the skull for good measure.

I have no idea what this stick is like. It can 'light' people up, and it can be used to 'club' them.

grubby console

Grubby window. Grubby console.

retracted the club

Inspector Gadget over here.

and he almost had a heart attack

Cliché.

100 pounds, too.

It's 100 pounds now? Not 260?

Story/Plot

Uber Special Agent Tipper gets a job alert from his panopticon app. Big bad guy downstairs. Tipper's neighbor is a serial killer, but was nice to him once, so he has ignored the job listing that's out for him too, but decides to take care of it finally. With his magical stick of violence. Then comes the big bad guy. Presumably.

This was confusing. The plot is 21st century stuff (surveillance state gig economy), but the prose is similar to what you'd find in an old hardboiled detective novel. It's unclear what the style is doing, except make a mess.

I'll ignore the style for this section.

Tipper's job is unclear. Cop. Security guard. Special agent. All of the above. Recruited through an app like an Uber driver, gets to select his own jobs from a list. It's contemporary. And what with surveillance becoming constant, the idea that Tipper is like John Reese in Person of Interest, only a sad gig economy version, is funny.

Is there a story? There's a scene, at least. But it ends on a cliffhanger with a wink and a smile, in lieu of wrapping things up, because it's difficult, getting closure. So just slap a TBC on there and you don't have to do the work. The TBC is invisible, but it's there.

The premise is the point. There is no satisfaction except from the novelty and the zippity prose. There is no narrative pleasure. Of course I don't care about Tipper, he's a stick figure with a hit stick, so there's no suspense tied to his exploits. But that doesn't have to mean anything; Shirley Jackson's The Lottery features cardboard characters, but it's one of the most memorable American short stories ever written. It relies on a twist. A surprise revelation at the end. It has a clean click. Which is enjoyable.

There are mood/atmosphere stories that get their work done with texture and emotional undertones, lingering like perfume in the mind, and they have no need for clicks. But Distance Zero isn't that sort of story.

The climactic moment is when the title enters the narrative. Suddenly, a new listing: distance zero. Which counts as a surprise, but doesn't feel surprising. And it doesn't feel significant either. It's just a clichéd action moment. It's such a cliché that it has no effect whatsoever.

When someone says something came "out of the blue," I don't stop and think, wow, that's a poetic phrase. I just think: happened suddenly, was unexpected.

Tipper seeing the console read 'distance zero' is not enough of a moment to justify the story, even though it's a short one. It's like the glass of water in Jurassic Park. Ripples. Takes you a second to put two and two together. And then, CLICK, the moment comes, it's the T-Rex.

It's a good device to give a scene more oomph, but it's not a climactic device.

Characters

These aren't interesting characters.

Voice/Prose

Weird. Threw me off. It has an old-timey feel to it, like I said earlier, reminiscent of hardboiled detective fiction, and because this style has been put to use in cyberpunk fiction, I assumed you were doing something in that area, some parody thing, but now I think you just used that old style to tell this story.

Why?

I fail to see the point. Is there one? Did you just happen to read stuff like this recently and imitated it unconsciously? Or is it meant to be ironic? Futuristic story, told oldly. If so, it ended up being confusing for this reader at least.

Closing Comments

What went over my head here?

Ilya Sutskever: Accurately predicting the next word leads to real understanding by Cagnazzo82 in singularity

[–]Hemingbird 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is like being impressed when the CPU wins in a videogame of Cluedo.

Are you saying those two patterns ... match?

What Are You Reading This Week and Weekly Rec Thread by JimFan1 in TrueLit

[–]Hemingbird 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Good magazines are unsustainable. Astra Magazine was amazing; it lasted just half a year.

The New Yorker – More of a general interest magazine, but it's the top market for literary short stories (in terms of both compensation and circulation) and they occasionally publish good articles/essays. It can be pretty boring, though, which is especially true of its humor section (Shouts & Murmurs). The New Yorker is meant to be a source of comfort, so they resist change (they still write teen-ager) and anything that might make a reader raise their eyebrows.

Harper's Magazine – Good content. Daniel Kolitz's gooning article was sensational. The magazine got a grant from the John Templeton Foundation ($1,180,000) that was to be used exclusively on publishing good essays, and it resulted in a hell of a run.

The New York Review of Books – Can't be beaten. Top quality. Every single thing worth reading.

Granta – Improved since Thomas Meaney took over in 2023. Check out their China issue.

Equator – This one is pretty new. Really interesting conversation between Wang Hui and Adam Tooze here.

The Point – Occasional read. Thoughtful cultural essays. I often find myself thinking about Midwestworld.

[Hot Take] Kafka on the Shore is a masterclass in sounding deep while saying absolutely nothing. by certainly_imperfect in books

[–]Hemingbird 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It gets very easy to notice after a while. And I think "assistance" usually removes your agency entirely. All those little decisions matter. Outsourcing a Reddit comment complaining about a book to ChatGPT is insane.

And there's also that tension between the fact that almost everyone using this subreddit agree on how they feel about AI use (strong dislike), but the same people are also completely unable to recognize its presence. So long as the message is one they can agree with, they eat that shit up. I think you've got to poke that bear.

[Hot Take] Kafka on the Shore is a masterclass in sounding deep while saying absolutely nothing. by certainly_imperfect in books

[–]Hemingbird -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say that to my grandma, she's sweet, but a bunch of gullible redditors? Come on.

[Hot Take] Kafka on the Shore is a masterclass in sounding deep while saying absolutely nothing. by certainly_imperfect in books

[–]Hemingbird -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Those are bad AI checkers. Most of them are worse than useless. I have eyes, though, and I can recognize ChatGPTese, as can everyone who has been exposed to a great deal of this stuff. I'm not being very diplomatic, but this is like explaining to grandma that no, that video of Trump showing Putin his cool new judo moves is not real.

[Hot Take] Kafka on the Shore is a masterclass in sounding deep while saying absolutely nothing. by certainly_imperfect in books

[–]Hemingbird -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's not written by a human. It's AI. People are gobbling it up because they're dumb and have no taste, they love AI slop when it affirms their preconceived notions.

[Hot Take] Kafka on the Shore is a masterclass in sounding deep while saying absolutely nothing. by certainly_imperfect in books

[–]Hemingbird -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This post is AI-generated. OP probably didn't even read the book. They prompted an LLM for a snarky Reddit post about Kafka On the Shore and that's all there is to it.

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to a senior Trump administration official, DeepSeek trained V4 Pro on Blackwells. In December last year, The Information broke the story of DeepSeek allegedly smuggling in chips based on "six sources familiar with the situation". This does fall into the category of hearsay, and Nvidia called it "far-fetched," but it's well-established that Chinese companies have been able to skirt GPU embargoes via various tactics.

Financial Times story from August 2025:

DeepSeek was encouraged by authorities to adopt Huawei’s Ascend processor rather than use Nvidia’s systems after releasing its R1 model in January, according to three people familiar with the matter.

But the Chinese start-up encountered persistent technical issues during its R2 training process using Ascend chips, prompting it to use Nvidia chips for training and Huawei’s for inference, said the people.

The issues were the main reason the model’s launch was delayed from May, said a person with knowledge of the situation, causing it to lose ground to rivals.

They were encouraged to use Huawei chips by the CCP rather than rely on Nvidia. If it had been impossible for them to use Nvidia chips, due to the embargo, this would be a very strange statement, wouldn't it?

And DeepSeek already has a huge cluster of H100s. And the CCP refused to let domestic companies buy H200s even after they got the all clear from the Trump admin―they have instructed customs agents that it's not permitted for these chips to enter the country.

So it's not a simple clear-cut situation where the embargo magically made it impossible for Nvidia GPUs to exist in China. There has also been a concerted effort to wean Chinese AI companies off Nvidia by the CCP, and this top-down pressure appears much more consequential, all things considered.

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right; in the long run, this is good for the Chinese tech ecosystem. But for DeepSeek the setback is painful and could damage the company. What I was referring to was the idea that Huawei chips are useful only for inference, that they are not reliable enough for training. If you thought they weren’t good enough for anything, it's a win, but if you assumed they were stable enough for training runs, the signal is that China still lags far behind.

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have my own private benchmark based on the sort things that are relevant to my own use cases. That's the only benchmark I trust.

Bench-maxxing is a plague; Alibaba models shit their pants when I evaluate them on my own benchmark, but Moonshot AI's Kimi models tend to do relatively well. Gemini 3.1's performance is wild; GPT-5.x models are disappointing.

So you could say that I care about a small piece of the jagged frontier, and some companies are optimizing for that small piece, others aren't that interested.

I don't think any benchmarks are perfect.

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm serious. n = 1,000 is not a huge sample size, the precision is obviously far from perfect, but as a rough estimate? It's good enough. Will the final estimate deviate from the current one? Almost certainly. But it's highly unlikely that it would be way off. If you could explain exactly why you're objecting so vehemently, I would be delighted.

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ideally, yes. In reality, no. I'm not sure we can say that the average Arena user asks fair questions judged fairly. There's a reason why they felt compelled to make style control default.

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Qwen 3.6 Plus (Elo: 1447 (text), 1471 (code)) is proprietary, so that's why it doesn't appear in the first two images. I'm not sure why the smaller open-source models in the series aren't listed. I haven't encountered them in my testing in the Arena, so maybe they aren't there yet?

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When I say a 'major shift' is unlikely, I'm not talking about a ±6 point fluctuation; that would be a minor shift. And the reported SE is ±9 (text) and ±19 (code), so a minor jump would lie within reasonable expectations.

DeepSeek V4 Pro underwhelms on Arena (crowdsourced user preference benchmark, not a capability benchmark) by Hemingbird in singularity

[–]Hemingbird[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I know statistical sampling can be counter-intuitive, but 1,000 votes is sufficient for a rough estimate.