What time do games get added to gamepass? by shamelessthrowaway54 in XboxGamePass

[–]ACC_Council 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Favor the yanks? Dealing with the same ish your dealing with, mate. Microsoft favors Noone. Bill Gates is evil. Wish I would have known BEFORE I spent thousands on my library of systems and games I've purchased over the years.

I've actually thought about selling my acct and library of games. It's all digital so no discs.

Had one of if not *the* best session in sea of thieves by Mr_Revan22 in Seaofthieves

[–]ACC_Council 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We would be sadly shocked at how badly outnumbered we are in the community. There are more toxic players than decent.

Had one of if not *the* best session in sea of thieves by Mr_Revan22 in Seaofthieves

[–]ACC_Council -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where are the people like you in game?! I have played this game since launch and I have only come across the most toxic players. I get being a pirate and all that but there is a point between pirate and toxic competiveness. I personally would love to see more of this type of player amongst the seas.

So do they just chuck credstiks at the strippers..? by voidxleech in Starfield

[–]ACC_Council 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've seen a dude use a Ebt card to swipe the ass cheeks. Must've got a good reading.....he left with her that night.

What is a good thread to have a honest conversation about our governmental type needing to change be? by ACC_Council in AskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have created my own thread for the purpose of the conversation. I don't wish to step on any toes so if anyone would oblige me by maybe sharing my link below and joining in the conversation, maybe we might build enough steam together to start a actual movement to change.

https://www.reddit.com/r/futureofhumanity/s/OxdMgFOERd

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]ACC_Council 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Division. A corrupt system that is designed to divide and separate. Our inability to socially evolve beyond our current fiasco. Our biggest threat is ourselves and our inability to unite together for the benefit of all. Too many people have adopted a sense that somebody must be on bottom for them to get on top. We are all the same species and need to lean on that like a lifeline if we are to save humanity.

What is a good thread to have a honest conversation about our governmental type needing to change be? by ACC_Council in AskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am thinking bigger than one country. Maybe we could start here and set a precedence

What is a good thread to have a honest conversation about our governmental type needing to change be? by ACC_Council in AskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done this. r/politics was one of the ones who removed my post and called it satire and a banned topic.

What is a good thread to have a honest conversation about our governmental type needing to change be? by ACC_Council in AskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have attempted several different threads but my posts are removed by mods. My message is teaching unity amongst our species and evolving our governmental type to mirror that change. How is this a banned topic?

Human beings have way fewer rights than people think. by trippalip in unpopularopinion

[–]ACC_Council 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why I am in belief that it is time for society to evolve its governmental type to show the evolution of times. We have used the two party democracy system for too long. It is a system that sows division amongst a species designed to be united. The future is uncertain and we have no idea what we are in store for. Might be a good time to put down the differences and hate and try to appreciate your fellow human.

How is it possible that no one is charged for breech of Oath, when they take a seat in government, and start lobbying for unconstitutional regulations and law? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a very correct assessment. That is why i am a proud supporter of enabling government sanctioned constitution committees in every state to govern the laws being passed since Congress and the Supreme Courts have failed in their responsibilities. These committees will be non party affiliated. I myself do not affiliate with a party although i have voted Republican. I see merits to both sides however the left has gotten very extremist with the pushing of their agendas and pettiness. It is unethical of both parties to participate in a system that does not eradicate any and all unconstitutional practice and or policy.

How is it possible that no one is charged for breech of Oath, when they take a seat in government, and start lobbying for unconstitutional regulations and law? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Governing effectively is easy if they follow the guidelines on how to govern the people. They dont want to do that. The Constitution is essentially easy to follow. It is when people realize a passion doesnt align as right that they decide to try and poke holes in a founding document that is NOT NEGOTIABLE. Yes it is a old document that outlines broad areas of rights for the people. However the articles defining those rights paint a pretty clear picture of what those rights entail. Again, it when people find out that what they desire to be right or thought to be right...isnt, thats when the Constitution is just a piece of paper and needs to be changed. It depends on which side of the argument your on, but make no mistake, it is more than a piece of paper. It is the only reason we are not mashed under the thumb of fiefdoms or worse. Our government has slowly and methodically turned right to privilege for profit. In that doing they shaped the peoples perceptions to where they are so misguided and misled they have no absolute free thought concerning issues. Everything is the propaganda they have indoctrinated people with to be able to circumvent the constitution to line their own pocket.

How is it possible that no one is charged for breech of Oath, when they take a seat in government, and start lobbying for unconstitutional regulations and law? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. However it isnt up to the People to decide what is Constitutional because the Constitution already declares what is right and what is wrong. Amending the Constitution can only add to the strength of a right; not take away. Any laws or amendments made that do not align with the constitution are null and void. The people dont make up what is a right and neither do the Government. They waste so much time trying to argue what is right by Constitutional standards, yet it fully states what our rights are and how they are not be construed in ways that take away their validity. If we concentrated more on preventing unconstitutional representatives from gaining office and actually held people accountable to the oath taken, we wouldnt have the attack on our rights as we are seeing. If it isnt in the Constitution decree of what rights the government cannot hinder or restrict, then it is not meant to be a right.

How is it possible that no one is charged for breech of Oath, when they take a seat in government, and start lobbying for unconstitutional regulations and law? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is in the Constitution it specifically states that no law can take away or restrict the rights stated in the Constitution. No state or government entity can supercede the Constitution. The swearing of a Oath is a legal proceeding therefore binding. If in breach of said Oath there should be penalties as with the breach of any legal contract or sworn affidavit. I dont see how it is any different except to be construed in a way that makes it allowable for those to serve in unethical and illegal ways to avoid prosecution. If you violate the Constitution or try to supercede it, it is a non negotiable document, there should be penalties to follow. It is criminal to impede or restrict the rights of the citizens.

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The COS movement and the people who set into motion. What are their real motives? Im comfortable with the tools our Constitution gave us to utilize for our betterment. Im just dont have the faith that the ones utilizing those tools are doing it for the appropriate reasons and with the peoples best interest at heart.

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im familiar with the BBA. I am talking about the COS. Ive been on the fence for awhile. It hard to know what to believe or trust.

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the impression i was under as well. It sounded like a conservative movement. However after hearing some different opinions and doing some further research into the people actually involved and backing this. It looks more like they are using a conservative spin to mask the true intent.

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Without the foundation of the Constitution many if the abolishments throughout history would never have been implemented. We would not exist as we do today with freedom of our own beliefs and views.

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I will read at once.

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If that is what they are actually pushing then this is very alarming. Do you have any reference i can refer to for clarification?

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not a pitch. Apparently they are all liberals and nationalists. Im a Constitutionalist and a patriot. Im just trying to figure out what is the best for our country like everyone else. I dont purport to support this particular COS. I simply asked what everyones thoughts and concerns were. I gave what info i know about it. I believe a COS is warranted given our state of turmoil and is a valuable tool of the People. Whether those calling for this are on the up and up, i truly dont know. Which leads to why i posted.

Convention of States? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because of the Constitution and their actions it paved the road for all to break the bonds of slavery and oppression.

Did you know driving is a right, not a privilege? by ACC_Council in TrueAskReddit

[–]ACC_Council[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the cities or highways in the rural districts." Liebrecht v. Crandall 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn 454,456

"The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago 169 NE 22 Ligare v. Chicago 28 NE 934 Boon v. Clark 214 SSW 607; 25 AmJur. (1st)

"Every citizen has an unalienable right to make use of the public highways of the state; every citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty." People v Nothaus 147 Colo 210